Accuracy of pedicle screw placement based on preoperative computed tomography versus intraoperative data set acquisition for spinal navigation system

Aim: To investigate the accuracy of pedicle screw placement based on preoperative computed tomography in comparison with intraoperative data set acquisition for spinal navigation system. Methods: The PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, and Web of Science were systematically searched for the literature publish...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hao Liu, Weikai Chen, Tao Liu, Bin Meng, Huilin Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-07-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499017718901
id doaj-0084a23e146d4a4992718b9aeeeb73db
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0084a23e146d4a4992718b9aeeeb73db2020-11-25T02:59:18ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery2309-49902017-07-012510.1177/2309499017718901Accuracy of pedicle screw placement based on preoperative computed tomography versus intraoperative data set acquisition for spinal navigation systemHao LiuWeikai ChenTao LiuBin MengHuilin YangAim: To investigate the accuracy of pedicle screw placement based on preoperative computed tomography in comparison with intraoperative data set acquisition for spinal navigation system. Methods: The PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, and Web of Science were systematically searched for the literature published up to September 2015. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines. Statistical analysis was performed using the Review Manager 5.3. The dichotomous data for the pedicle violation rate was summarized using relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with the fixed-effects model. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: For this meta-analysis, seven studies used a total of 579 patients and 2981 screws. The results revealed that the accuracy of intraoperative data set acquisition method is significantly higher than preoperative one using 2 mm grading criteria (RR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.09, 3.04, I 2 = 0%, p = 0.02). However, there was no significant difference between two kinds of methods at the 0 mm grading criteria (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.88, 1.46, I 2 = 17%, p = 0.34). Using the 2-mm grading criteria, there was a higher accuracy of pedicle screw insertion in O-arm-assisted navigation than CT-based navigation method (RR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.05, 3.64, I 2 = 0%, p = 0.03). The accuracy between CT-based navigation and two-dimensional-based navigation showed no significant difference (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.35-3.03, I 2 = 0%, p = 0.97). Conclusions: The intraoperative data set acquisition method may decrease the incidence of perforated screws over 2 mm but not increase the number of screws fully contained within the pedicle compared to preoperative CT-based navigation system. A significantly higher accuracy of intraoperative (O-arm) than preoperative CT-based navigation was revealed using 2 mm grading criteria.https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499017718901
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hao Liu
Weikai Chen
Tao Liu
Bin Meng
Huilin Yang
spellingShingle Hao Liu
Weikai Chen
Tao Liu
Bin Meng
Huilin Yang
Accuracy of pedicle screw placement based on preoperative computed tomography versus intraoperative data set acquisition for spinal navigation system
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
author_facet Hao Liu
Weikai Chen
Tao Liu
Bin Meng
Huilin Yang
author_sort Hao Liu
title Accuracy of pedicle screw placement based on preoperative computed tomography versus intraoperative data set acquisition for spinal navigation system
title_short Accuracy of pedicle screw placement based on preoperative computed tomography versus intraoperative data set acquisition for spinal navigation system
title_full Accuracy of pedicle screw placement based on preoperative computed tomography versus intraoperative data set acquisition for spinal navigation system
title_fullStr Accuracy of pedicle screw placement based on preoperative computed tomography versus intraoperative data set acquisition for spinal navigation system
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of pedicle screw placement based on preoperative computed tomography versus intraoperative data set acquisition for spinal navigation system
title_sort accuracy of pedicle screw placement based on preoperative computed tomography versus intraoperative data set acquisition for spinal navigation system
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
issn 2309-4990
publishDate 2017-07-01
description Aim: To investigate the accuracy of pedicle screw placement based on preoperative computed tomography in comparison with intraoperative data set acquisition for spinal navigation system. Methods: The PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, and Web of Science were systematically searched for the literature published up to September 2015. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines. Statistical analysis was performed using the Review Manager 5.3. The dichotomous data for the pedicle violation rate was summarized using relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with the fixed-effects model. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: For this meta-analysis, seven studies used a total of 579 patients and 2981 screws. The results revealed that the accuracy of intraoperative data set acquisition method is significantly higher than preoperative one using 2 mm grading criteria (RR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.09, 3.04, I 2 = 0%, p = 0.02). However, there was no significant difference between two kinds of methods at the 0 mm grading criteria (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.88, 1.46, I 2 = 17%, p = 0.34). Using the 2-mm grading criteria, there was a higher accuracy of pedicle screw insertion in O-arm-assisted navigation than CT-based navigation method (RR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.05, 3.64, I 2 = 0%, p = 0.03). The accuracy between CT-based navigation and two-dimensional-based navigation showed no significant difference (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.35-3.03, I 2 = 0%, p = 0.97). Conclusions: The intraoperative data set acquisition method may decrease the incidence of perforated screws over 2 mm but not increase the number of screws fully contained within the pedicle compared to preoperative CT-based navigation system. A significantly higher accuracy of intraoperative (O-arm) than preoperative CT-based navigation was revealed using 2 mm grading criteria.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499017718901
work_keys_str_mv AT haoliu accuracyofpediclescrewplacementbasedonpreoperativecomputedtomographyversusintraoperativedatasetacquisitionforspinalnavigationsystem
AT weikaichen accuracyofpediclescrewplacementbasedonpreoperativecomputedtomographyversusintraoperativedatasetacquisitionforspinalnavigationsystem
AT taoliu accuracyofpediclescrewplacementbasedonpreoperativecomputedtomographyversusintraoperativedatasetacquisitionforspinalnavigationsystem
AT binmeng accuracyofpediclescrewplacementbasedonpreoperativecomputedtomographyversusintraoperativedatasetacquisitionforspinalnavigationsystem
AT huilinyang accuracyofpediclescrewplacementbasedonpreoperativecomputedtomographyversusintraoperativedatasetacquisitionforspinalnavigationsystem
_version_ 1724703172846419968