New Classification for Clinically Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Pathology in Cervical Disc Disease

Study DesignClinical adjacent segment pathology (CASP) is common after cervical disc surgery. A critical examination of 320 patients operated for cervical disc prolapse revealed that CASP can also occur in patients with congenital and degenerative fusion of cervical spine. This has not been studied...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Srinivasan Sreeramulu Uddanapalli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Spine Society 2015-12-01
Series:Asian Spine Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-9-942.pdf
id doaj-02932704388e419baad1c4c5ddc3da78
record_format Article
spelling doaj-02932704388e419baad1c4c5ddc3da782020-11-25T01:32:45ZengKorean Spine SocietyAsian Spine Journal1976-19021976-78462015-12-019694295110.4184/asj.2015.9.6.942869New Classification for Clinically Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Pathology in Cervical Disc DiseaseSrinivasan Sreeramulu Uddanapalli0Department of Neurosurgery, MIOT Hospitals, Chennai, India.Study DesignClinical adjacent segment pathology (CASP) is common after cervical disc surgery. A critical examination of 320 patients operated for cervical disc prolapse revealed that CASP can also occur in patients with congenital and degenerative fusion of cervical spine. This has not been studied in depth and there is a need for a practically applicable classification of CASP.PurposeTo develop a new classification scheme of CASP.Overview of LiteratureA review of the literature did not reveal a practically applicable classification incorporating the occurrence of CASP in congenital and degenerative fusion cases.MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of 320 patients operated (509 disc spaces) on for cervical disc prolapse. Cases (n=316) were followed-up for 3-11 years. Random sampling of 220 patients with postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 165 cases was analyzed.ResultsSix symptomatic CASP cases required resurgery (1.9%), eight cases involved MRI proven CASP with axial neck pain only and 13 patients were asymptomatic with radiological adjacent segment pathology (RASP). The frequency rate was 8.5% (27/316). Four cases of congenital or degenerative fusion of vertebra developed CASP requiring surgery. CASP is classified as primary or secondary follows. Primary A1 was congenital fusion of vertebra and primary A2 was degenerative fusion of the vertebra. Secondary, which was after cervical disc surgery, comprised B1 (RASP in asymptomatic patients), B2 (CASP in patients with axial neck pain), and B3 (CASP with myeloradiculopathy). B3 was subdivided into single-level CASP (B3a) and multiple-level CASP (B3b).ConclusionsSymptomatic CASP requiring resurgery is infrequent. CASP can occur in patients with congenital and degenerative fusion of the cervical spine. A new classification for CASP along with treatment strategy is proposed. Patients in Primary CASP and B3 CASP require resurgery while others require only observation.http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-9-942.pdfClinical adjacent segment pathologyAdjacent segment degenerationAdjacent segment diseaseAnterior cervical discectomyCervical disc prolapse
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Srinivasan Sreeramulu Uddanapalli
spellingShingle Srinivasan Sreeramulu Uddanapalli
New Classification for Clinically Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Pathology in Cervical Disc Disease
Asian Spine Journal
Clinical adjacent segment pathology
Adjacent segment degeneration
Adjacent segment disease
Anterior cervical discectomy
Cervical disc prolapse
author_facet Srinivasan Sreeramulu Uddanapalli
author_sort Srinivasan Sreeramulu Uddanapalli
title New Classification for Clinically Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Pathology in Cervical Disc Disease
title_short New Classification for Clinically Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Pathology in Cervical Disc Disease
title_full New Classification for Clinically Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Pathology in Cervical Disc Disease
title_fullStr New Classification for Clinically Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Pathology in Cervical Disc Disease
title_full_unstemmed New Classification for Clinically Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Pathology in Cervical Disc Disease
title_sort new classification for clinically symptomatic adjacent segment pathology in cervical disc disease
publisher Korean Spine Society
series Asian Spine Journal
issn 1976-1902
1976-7846
publishDate 2015-12-01
description Study DesignClinical adjacent segment pathology (CASP) is common after cervical disc surgery. A critical examination of 320 patients operated for cervical disc prolapse revealed that CASP can also occur in patients with congenital and degenerative fusion of cervical spine. This has not been studied in depth and there is a need for a practically applicable classification of CASP.PurposeTo develop a new classification scheme of CASP.Overview of LiteratureA review of the literature did not reveal a practically applicable classification incorporating the occurrence of CASP in congenital and degenerative fusion cases.MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of 320 patients operated (509 disc spaces) on for cervical disc prolapse. Cases (n=316) were followed-up for 3-11 years. Random sampling of 220 patients with postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 165 cases was analyzed.ResultsSix symptomatic CASP cases required resurgery (1.9%), eight cases involved MRI proven CASP with axial neck pain only and 13 patients were asymptomatic with radiological adjacent segment pathology (RASP). The frequency rate was 8.5% (27/316). Four cases of congenital or degenerative fusion of vertebra developed CASP requiring surgery. CASP is classified as primary or secondary follows. Primary A1 was congenital fusion of vertebra and primary A2 was degenerative fusion of the vertebra. Secondary, which was after cervical disc surgery, comprised B1 (RASP in asymptomatic patients), B2 (CASP in patients with axial neck pain), and B3 (CASP with myeloradiculopathy). B3 was subdivided into single-level CASP (B3a) and multiple-level CASP (B3b).ConclusionsSymptomatic CASP requiring resurgery is infrequent. CASP can occur in patients with congenital and degenerative fusion of the cervical spine. A new classification for CASP along with treatment strategy is proposed. Patients in Primary CASP and B3 CASP require resurgery while others require only observation.
topic Clinical adjacent segment pathology
Adjacent segment degeneration
Adjacent segment disease
Anterior cervical discectomy
Cervical disc prolapse
url http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-9-942.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT srinivasansreeramuluuddanapalli newclassificationforclinicallysymptomaticadjacentsegmentpathologyincervicaldiscdisease
_version_ 1725080039263830016