Sampling probes affect bulk density and soil organic carbon measurements

Abstract Soil sampling equipment can be a major source of bias in soil organic carbon (SOC) stock estimations. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of sampling probes on soil bulk density (BD) and SOC stocks calculated using fixed depth (FD) and equivalent soil mass (ESM) methods....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sumit Sharma, Tracy Wilson, Tyson Ochsner, Jason G. Warren
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Agricultural & Environmental Letters
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.20005
id doaj-030b1ff9535744df9f21d48fba5283c1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-030b1ff9535744df9f21d48fba5283c12021-02-05T06:02:44ZengWileyAgricultural & Environmental Letters2471-96252020-01-0151n/an/a10.1002/ael2.20005Sampling probes affect bulk density and soil organic carbon measurementsSumit Sharma0Tracy Wilson1Tyson Ochsner2Jason G. Warren3Dep. of Plant and Soil Sciences Oklahoma State Univ. 371 Agricultural Hall Stillwater OK 74078‐6027 USADep. of Plant and Soil Sciences Oklahoma State Univ. 371 Agricultural Hall Stillwater OK 74078‐6027 USADep. of Plant and Soil Sciences Oklahoma State Univ. 371 Agricultural Hall Stillwater OK 74078‐6027 USADep. of Plant and Soil Sciences Oklahoma State Univ. 371 Agricultural Hall Stillwater OK 74078‐6027 USAAbstract Soil sampling equipment can be a major source of bias in soil organic carbon (SOC) stock estimations. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of sampling probes on soil bulk density (BD) and SOC stocks calculated using fixed depth (FD) and equivalent soil mass (ESM) methods. Soil samples were collected to 30 cm using three probes with different diameters and divided into 0–10‐, 10–20‐, and 20–30‐cm layers. The probe with smallest diameter measured higher BD at 0–10 cm in 42% of fields and was significantly different when averaged across fields, while no consistent differences were observed at lower depths. This study shows that sampling probes with different diameters may introduce biases in BD and SOC measurements at individual or combined soil layers when calculated using the FD approach. The ESM approach reduced the differences in mean SOC stocks calculated using different probes.https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.20005
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sumit Sharma
Tracy Wilson
Tyson Ochsner
Jason G. Warren
spellingShingle Sumit Sharma
Tracy Wilson
Tyson Ochsner
Jason G. Warren
Sampling probes affect bulk density and soil organic carbon measurements
Agricultural & Environmental Letters
author_facet Sumit Sharma
Tracy Wilson
Tyson Ochsner
Jason G. Warren
author_sort Sumit Sharma
title Sampling probes affect bulk density and soil organic carbon measurements
title_short Sampling probes affect bulk density and soil organic carbon measurements
title_full Sampling probes affect bulk density and soil organic carbon measurements
title_fullStr Sampling probes affect bulk density and soil organic carbon measurements
title_full_unstemmed Sampling probes affect bulk density and soil organic carbon measurements
title_sort sampling probes affect bulk density and soil organic carbon measurements
publisher Wiley
series Agricultural & Environmental Letters
issn 2471-9625
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Abstract Soil sampling equipment can be a major source of bias in soil organic carbon (SOC) stock estimations. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of sampling probes on soil bulk density (BD) and SOC stocks calculated using fixed depth (FD) and equivalent soil mass (ESM) methods. Soil samples were collected to 30 cm using three probes with different diameters and divided into 0–10‐, 10–20‐, and 20–30‐cm layers. The probe with smallest diameter measured higher BD at 0–10 cm in 42% of fields and was significantly different when averaged across fields, while no consistent differences were observed at lower depths. This study shows that sampling probes with different diameters may introduce biases in BD and SOC measurements at individual or combined soil layers when calculated using the FD approach. The ESM approach reduced the differences in mean SOC stocks calculated using different probes.
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.20005
work_keys_str_mv AT sumitsharma samplingprobesaffectbulkdensityandsoilorganiccarbonmeasurements
AT tracywilson samplingprobesaffectbulkdensityandsoilorganiccarbonmeasurements
AT tysonochsner samplingprobesaffectbulkdensityandsoilorganiccarbonmeasurements
AT jasongwarren samplingprobesaffectbulkdensityandsoilorganiccarbonmeasurements
_version_ 1724284156244918272