Seasonal streamflow forecasting by conditioning climatology with precipitation indices
Many fields, such as drought-risk assessment or reservoir management, can benefit from long-range streamflow forecasts. Climatology has long been used in long-range streamflow forecasting. Conditioning methods have been proposed to select or weight relevant historical time series from climatology. T...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2017-03-01
|
Series: | Hydrology and Earth System Sciences |
Online Access: | http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/21/1573/2017/hess-21-1573-2017.pdf |
Summary: | Many fields, such as drought-risk assessment or reservoir
management, can benefit from long-range streamflow forecasts. Climatology has
long been used in long-range streamflow forecasting. Conditioning methods
have been proposed to select or weight relevant historical time series from
climatology. They are often based on general circulation model (GCM) outputs
that are specific to the forecast date due to the initialisation of GCMs on
current conditions. This study investigates the impact of conditioning
methods on the performance of seasonal streamflow forecasts. Four
conditioning statistics based on seasonal forecasts of cumulative
precipitation and the standardised precipitation index were used to select
relevant traces within historical streamflows and precipitation
respectively. This resulted in eight conditioned streamflow forecast
scenarios. These scenarios were compared to the climatology of historical
streamflows, the ensemble streamflow prediction approach and the streamflow
forecasts obtained from ECMWF System 4 precipitation forecasts. The impact
of conditioning was assessed in terms of forecast sharpness (spread),
reliability, overall performance and low-flow event detection. Results
showed that conditioning past observations on seasonal precipitation indices
generally improves forecast sharpness, but may reduce reliability, with
respect to climatology. Conversely, conditioned ensembles were more reliable
but less sharp than streamflow forecasts derived from System 4
precipitation. Forecast attributes from conditioned and unconditioned
ensembles are illustrated for a case of drought-risk forecasting: the 2003
drought in France. In the case of low-flow forecasting, conditioning results
in ensembles that can better assess weekly deficit volumes and durations
over a wider range of lead times. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1027-5606 1607-7938 |