Mandibular symphysis dimensions in different sagittal and vertical skeletal relationships

Background: The aim of this cross-sectional study was to compare the dimensions of mandibular symphysis (MS) between gender and the different sagittal and vertical skeletal relationships. Material and Methods: Pre-treatment records of orthodontic patients were divided according to gender, sagittal (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amal I. Linjawi, Ahmed R. Afify, Hosam A. Baeshen, Dowen Birkhed, Khalid H. Zawawi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-01-01
Series:Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319562X2030468X
Description
Summary:Background: The aim of this cross-sectional study was to compare the dimensions of mandibular symphysis (MS) between gender and the different sagittal and vertical skeletal relationships. Material and Methods: Pre-treatment records of orthodontic patients were divided according to gender, sagittal (Class I, II and III) and vertical (decreased, average and increased mandibular plane [MP] angle) skeletal relationships. Measurements of MS parameters were performed on lateral cephalograms using IMAGEJ software. Comparisons between MS parameters and gender and the different skeletal relationships was performed using multifactorial and one-way ANOVA, and independent sample t-tests. Results: A total of 104 records (25 males and 79 females) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Males had significantly greater MS surface area, dentoalveolar length, skeletal symphysis length, total symphysis length, vertical symphysis dimension and symphysis convexity (p < 0.05). Skeletal Class II patients had significantly greater dentoalveolar and skeletal symphysis lengths while Class III had greater chin length, vertical symphysis dimension and symphysis convexity (p < 0.05). Patients with decreased vertical dimension had greater skeletal symphysis length (p = 0.026) and those with an average vertical relationship had greater chin length (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The morphology of the mandibular symphysis is affected by gender, sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns. Males had increased mandibular symphysis surface area and linear dimensions. Class II patients had greater dentoalveolar length. Chin length was greater in patients with an average MP angle.
ISSN:1319-562X