Comparison of sputum induction and bronchoscopy in diagnosis of sputum smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Pulmonary tuberculosis is one of the most common infectious diseases worldwide. Patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis with negative smear are recommended to undergo further tests including sputum induction and bronchoscopy. Our study is aimed to compare sputum induction...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wen Luo, Yihua Lin, Zhibin Li, Wanyu Wang, Yonghong Shi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-05-01
Series:BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12890-020-01192-w
id doaj-161cdccf5be64767b8c0e37be45d7f7b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-161cdccf5be64767b8c0e37be45d7f7b2020-11-25T03:15:23ZengBMCBMC Pulmonary Medicine1471-24662020-05-012011910.1186/s12890-020-01192-wComparison of sputum induction and bronchoscopy in diagnosis of sputum smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis: a systemic review and meta-analysisWen Luo0Yihua Lin1Zhibin Li2Wanyu Wang3Yonghong Shi4Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen UniversityDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen UniversityEpidemiology Research Unit, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen UniversityDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen UniversityDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen UniversityAbstract Background Pulmonary tuberculosis is one of the most common infectious diseases worldwide. Patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis with negative smear are recommended to undergo further tests including sputum induction and bronchoscopy. Our study is aimed to compare sputum induction and bronchoscopic specimens in the diagnosis of sputum smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis. Method PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase were searched for eligible studies. The pooled sensitivities (SEN), specificities (SPE), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were constructed, and the areas under the curves (AUCs) were calculated. Results Five studies with a total number of 586 cases were included. For mycobacterial culture, the SEN and SPE of sputum induction were 0.72(95% CI, 0.66–0.77) and 1.00(95%CI, 0.99–1.000) respectively, whereas the SEN and SPE of bronchoscopy were 0.70(95%CI, 0.64–0.75) and 1.00(95%CI, 0.99–1.00) respectively. Sputum induction had a similar AUC (0.9564, SE = 0.0749) with bronchoscopy (0.8618, SE = 0.1652) (P = 0.602). For specimen of acid-fast bacilli smear, the SEN and SPE of sputum induction were 0.35(95% CI, 0.29–0.42) and 0.99(95% CI, 0.96–1.00) respectively, whereas the SEN and SPE of bronchoscopy were 0.38(95% CI, 0.32–0.45) and 0.99(95% CI, 0.96–1.00) respectively. There is no statistically significant difference in the AUC for sputum induction (0.6016) compared with bronchoscopy (0.8163) (P = 0.792). Conclusions For the diagnosis of sputum smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis, the diagnosis yield of sputum induction and bronchoscopy is similar.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12890-020-01192-wTuberculosisInduced sputumBronchoscopyMeta-analysisDiagnosis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wen Luo
Yihua Lin
Zhibin Li
Wanyu Wang
Yonghong Shi
spellingShingle Wen Luo
Yihua Lin
Zhibin Li
Wanyu Wang
Yonghong Shi
Comparison of sputum induction and bronchoscopy in diagnosis of sputum smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis: a systemic review and meta-analysis
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Tuberculosis
Induced sputum
Bronchoscopy
Meta-analysis
Diagnosis
author_facet Wen Luo
Yihua Lin
Zhibin Li
Wanyu Wang
Yonghong Shi
author_sort Wen Luo
title Comparison of sputum induction and bronchoscopy in diagnosis of sputum smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis: a systemic review and meta-analysis
title_short Comparison of sputum induction and bronchoscopy in diagnosis of sputum smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis: a systemic review and meta-analysis
title_full Comparison of sputum induction and bronchoscopy in diagnosis of sputum smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis: a systemic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of sputum induction and bronchoscopy in diagnosis of sputum smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis: a systemic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of sputum induction and bronchoscopy in diagnosis of sputum smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis: a systemic review and meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of sputum induction and bronchoscopy in diagnosis of sputum smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis: a systemic review and meta-analysis
publisher BMC
series BMC Pulmonary Medicine
issn 1471-2466
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Abstract Background Pulmonary tuberculosis is one of the most common infectious diseases worldwide. Patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis with negative smear are recommended to undergo further tests including sputum induction and bronchoscopy. Our study is aimed to compare sputum induction and bronchoscopic specimens in the diagnosis of sputum smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis. Method PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase were searched for eligible studies. The pooled sensitivities (SEN), specificities (SPE), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were constructed, and the areas under the curves (AUCs) were calculated. Results Five studies with a total number of 586 cases were included. For mycobacterial culture, the SEN and SPE of sputum induction were 0.72(95% CI, 0.66–0.77) and 1.00(95%CI, 0.99–1.000) respectively, whereas the SEN and SPE of bronchoscopy were 0.70(95%CI, 0.64–0.75) and 1.00(95%CI, 0.99–1.00) respectively. Sputum induction had a similar AUC (0.9564, SE = 0.0749) with bronchoscopy (0.8618, SE = 0.1652) (P = 0.602). For specimen of acid-fast bacilli smear, the SEN and SPE of sputum induction were 0.35(95% CI, 0.29–0.42) and 0.99(95% CI, 0.96–1.00) respectively, whereas the SEN and SPE of bronchoscopy were 0.38(95% CI, 0.32–0.45) and 0.99(95% CI, 0.96–1.00) respectively. There is no statistically significant difference in the AUC for sputum induction (0.6016) compared with bronchoscopy (0.8163) (P = 0.792). Conclusions For the diagnosis of sputum smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis, the diagnosis yield of sputum induction and bronchoscopy is similar.
topic Tuberculosis
Induced sputum
Bronchoscopy
Meta-analysis
Diagnosis
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12890-020-01192-w
work_keys_str_mv AT wenluo comparisonofsputuminductionandbronchoscopyindiagnosisofsputumsmearnegativepulmonarytuberculosisasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yihualin comparisonofsputuminductionandbronchoscopyindiagnosisofsputumsmearnegativepulmonarytuberculosisasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhibinli comparisonofsputuminductionandbronchoscopyindiagnosisofsputumsmearnegativepulmonarytuberculosisasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wanyuwang comparisonofsputuminductionandbronchoscopyindiagnosisofsputumsmearnegativepulmonarytuberculosisasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yonghongshi comparisonofsputuminductionandbronchoscopyindiagnosisofsputumsmearnegativepulmonarytuberculosisasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1724639856306421760