Detection of proximal caries using digital radiographic systems with different resolutions

Background: Dental radiography is an important tool for detection of caries and digital radiography is the latest advancement in this regard. Spatial resolution is a characteristic of digital receptors used for describing the quality of images. Aim: This study was aimed to compare the diagnostic ac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sima Nikneshan, Fatemeh Mashhadi Abbas, Sedigheh Sabbagh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2015-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Dental Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2015;volume=26;issue=1;spage=5;epage=10;aulast=Nikneshan
id doaj-16583742261a48ba9101c599028e9634
record_format Article
spelling doaj-16583742261a48ba9101c599028e96342020-11-24T23:23:47ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Dental Research0970-92901998-36032015-01-0126151010.4103/0970-9290.156787Detection of proximal caries using digital radiographic systems with different resolutionsSima NikneshanFatemeh Mashhadi AbbasSedigheh SabbaghBackground: Dental radiography is an important tool for detection of caries and digital radiography is the latest advancement in this regard. Spatial resolution is a characteristic of digital receptors used for describing the quality of images. Aim: This study was aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of two digital radiographic systems with three different resolutions for detection of noncavitated proximal caries. Settings and Design: Diagnostic accuracy. Materials and Methods: Seventy premolar teeth were mounted in 14 gypsum blocks. Digora; Optime and RVG Access were used for obtaining digital radiographs. Six observers evaluated the proximal surfaces in radiographs for each resolution in order to determine the depth of caries based on a 4-point scale. The teeth were then histologically sectioned, and the results of histologic analysis were considered as the gold standard. Data were entered using SPSS version 18 software and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for data analysis. P <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: No significant difference was found between different resolutions for detection of proximal caries (P > 0.05). RVG access system had the highest specificity (87.7%) and Digora; Optime at high resolution had the lowest specificity (84.2%). Furthermore, Digora; Optime had higher sensitivity for detection of caries exceeding outer half of enamel. Judgment of oral radiologists for detection of the depth of caries had higher reliability than that of restorative dentistry specialists. Conclusion: The three resolutions of Digora; Optime and RVG access had similar accuracy in detection of noncavitated proximal caries.http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2015;volume=26;issue=1;spage=5;epage=10;aulast=NikneshanCariesdentaldigitalradiographyspatial resolution
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sima Nikneshan
Fatemeh Mashhadi Abbas
Sedigheh Sabbagh
spellingShingle Sima Nikneshan
Fatemeh Mashhadi Abbas
Sedigheh Sabbagh
Detection of proximal caries using digital radiographic systems with different resolutions
Indian Journal of Dental Research
Caries
dental
digital
radiography
spatial resolution
author_facet Sima Nikneshan
Fatemeh Mashhadi Abbas
Sedigheh Sabbagh
author_sort Sima Nikneshan
title Detection of proximal caries using digital radiographic systems with different resolutions
title_short Detection of proximal caries using digital radiographic systems with different resolutions
title_full Detection of proximal caries using digital radiographic systems with different resolutions
title_fullStr Detection of proximal caries using digital radiographic systems with different resolutions
title_full_unstemmed Detection of proximal caries using digital radiographic systems with different resolutions
title_sort detection of proximal caries using digital radiographic systems with different resolutions
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Dental Research
issn 0970-9290
1998-3603
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Background: Dental radiography is an important tool for detection of caries and digital radiography is the latest advancement in this regard. Spatial resolution is a characteristic of digital receptors used for describing the quality of images. Aim: This study was aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of two digital radiographic systems with three different resolutions for detection of noncavitated proximal caries. Settings and Design: Diagnostic accuracy. Materials and Methods: Seventy premolar teeth were mounted in 14 gypsum blocks. Digora; Optime and RVG Access were used for obtaining digital radiographs. Six observers evaluated the proximal surfaces in radiographs for each resolution in order to determine the depth of caries based on a 4-point scale. The teeth were then histologically sectioned, and the results of histologic analysis were considered as the gold standard. Data were entered using SPSS version 18 software and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for data analysis. P <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: No significant difference was found between different resolutions for detection of proximal caries (P > 0.05). RVG access system had the highest specificity (87.7%) and Digora; Optime at high resolution had the lowest specificity (84.2%). Furthermore, Digora; Optime had higher sensitivity for detection of caries exceeding outer half of enamel. Judgment of oral radiologists for detection of the depth of caries had higher reliability than that of restorative dentistry specialists. Conclusion: The three resolutions of Digora; Optime and RVG access had similar accuracy in detection of noncavitated proximal caries.
topic Caries
dental
digital
radiography
spatial resolution
url http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2015;volume=26;issue=1;spage=5;epage=10;aulast=Nikneshan
work_keys_str_mv AT simanikneshan detectionofproximalcariesusingdigitalradiographicsystemswithdifferentresolutions
AT fatemehmashhadiabbas detectionofproximalcariesusingdigitalradiographicsystemswithdifferentresolutions
AT sedighehsabbagh detectionofproximalcariesusingdigitalradiographicsystemswithdifferentresolutions
_version_ 1725563690246209536