On the utility of the trail making test in migraine with and without aura: a meta-analysis

Abstract This meta-analytical review assesses the utility of the Trail Making Test (TMT), versions A and B, in detecting migraine-related cognitive deficits. A comprehensive literature search was performed in two electronic databases and other sources to obtain relevant studies administering TMT to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Antonino Vallesi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-06-01
Series:The Journal of Headache and Pain
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s10194-020-01137-y
id doaj-1c9eed1c8df442668c653828b0dc9846
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1c9eed1c8df442668c653828b0dc98462020-11-25T02:46:59ZengBMCThe Journal of Headache and Pain1129-23691129-23772020-06-0121111010.1186/s10194-020-01137-yOn the utility of the trail making test in migraine with and without aura: a meta-analysisAntonino Vallesi0Department of Neuroscience & Padova Neuroscience Center, University of PadovaAbstract This meta-analytical review assesses the utility of the Trail Making Test (TMT), versions A and B, in detecting migraine-related cognitive deficits. A comprehensive literature search was performed in two electronic databases and other sources to obtain relevant studies administering TMT to migraine patients. Search terms included “migraine” and “Trail Making”. Only studies in which the TMT-A, TMT-B or both were administered to adult patients suffering from migraine with and without aura were included. All pooled meta-analyses were based on random effects models. A total of 14 studies for TMT-A and 15 for TMT-B met inclusion criteria and were subjected to meta-analyses. Results showed that performance is worse in migraine patients than in controls for both the TMT-A (Hedges’ g = −.28) and TMT-B (g = −.37), with no difference between migraine with and without aura. This study demonstrates the sensitivity of the TMT in detecting cognitive alterations in migraine. This test should be considered for inclusion in cognitive batteries assessing patients with migraine.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s10194-020-01137-yExecutive functionsMental flexibilityMigraine with auraMigraine without auraNeuropsychological assessmentResponse speed
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Antonino Vallesi
spellingShingle Antonino Vallesi
On the utility of the trail making test in migraine with and without aura: a meta-analysis
The Journal of Headache and Pain
Executive functions
Mental flexibility
Migraine with aura
Migraine without aura
Neuropsychological assessment
Response speed
author_facet Antonino Vallesi
author_sort Antonino Vallesi
title On the utility of the trail making test in migraine with and without aura: a meta-analysis
title_short On the utility of the trail making test in migraine with and without aura: a meta-analysis
title_full On the utility of the trail making test in migraine with and without aura: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr On the utility of the trail making test in migraine with and without aura: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed On the utility of the trail making test in migraine with and without aura: a meta-analysis
title_sort on the utility of the trail making test in migraine with and without aura: a meta-analysis
publisher BMC
series The Journal of Headache and Pain
issn 1129-2369
1129-2377
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Abstract This meta-analytical review assesses the utility of the Trail Making Test (TMT), versions A and B, in detecting migraine-related cognitive deficits. A comprehensive literature search was performed in two electronic databases and other sources to obtain relevant studies administering TMT to migraine patients. Search terms included “migraine” and “Trail Making”. Only studies in which the TMT-A, TMT-B or both were administered to adult patients suffering from migraine with and without aura were included. All pooled meta-analyses were based on random effects models. A total of 14 studies for TMT-A and 15 for TMT-B met inclusion criteria and were subjected to meta-analyses. Results showed that performance is worse in migraine patients than in controls for both the TMT-A (Hedges’ g = −.28) and TMT-B (g = −.37), with no difference between migraine with and without aura. This study demonstrates the sensitivity of the TMT in detecting cognitive alterations in migraine. This test should be considered for inclusion in cognitive batteries assessing patients with migraine.
topic Executive functions
Mental flexibility
Migraine with aura
Migraine without aura
Neuropsychological assessment
Response speed
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s10194-020-01137-y
work_keys_str_mv AT antoninovallesi ontheutilityofthetrailmakingtestinmigrainewithandwithoutauraametaanalysis
_version_ 1724755370420731904