Oral mucosal grafts in one-stage urethroplasty for panurethral strictures

Objectives: Panurethral strictures are complex and extensive strictures that involve the penile and bulbar urethra. Management of these patients is challenging. In the last two decades, oral mucosal grafts have gained widespread popularity as the most versatile substitute tissue for urethral reconst...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ngwobia Peter Agwu, Ismaila Arzika Mungadi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bulgarian Association of Young Surgeons 2020-04-01
Series:International Journal of Surgery and Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ejos.org/index.php?fulltxt=77922&fulltxtj=136&fulltxtp=136-1576253234.pdf
id doaj-1cd9bc1362764dc29b0444bdcbea4225
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1cd9bc1362764dc29b0444bdcbea42252021-04-03T16:27:19ZengBulgarian Association of Young SurgeonsInternational Journal of Surgery and Medicine2367-699X2367-699X2020-04-0162http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/ijsm.panurethral-strictures-complicationOral mucosal grafts in one-stage urethroplasty for panurethral stricturesNgwobia Peter Agwu, Ismaila Arzika MungadiObjectives: Panurethral strictures are complex and extensive strictures that involve the penile and bulbar urethra. Management of these patients is challenging. In the last two decades, oral mucosal grafts have gained widespread popularity as the most versatile substitute tissue for urethral reconstruction. This paper presents the short- term outcome of our experience in the use of oral mucosal grafts in one-stage urethroplasty in patients with panurethral strictures. Patients and Methods: Between April 2012 and January 2017, 62 men were evaluated and had one-stage oral mucosa urethroplasty for panurethral strictures. Results: The mean age of the patients was 50 years with a range of 11-75 years. Aetiological factors were poorly treated urethritis 39 (62.9%), indwelling urethral catheterization 18 (29.0%), trauma 1 (1.6%) and lichen sclerosis 1 (1.6%). Reasons for urethral catheterization were for intraoperative monitoring 9 (50.0 %), relief of acute urine retention 4 (22.2%) and others 4 (22.2%). Fifty-two patients (83.9%) had preliminary urinary diversion by supra-pubic cystostomy before urethroplasty. The mean OMG length was 11.7cm and donor sites were buccal in 37 (59.7%), combined buccal and labial in 20 (32.3%). Fifty-seven (88.7%) patients had satisfactory voiding on removal of the urethral catheter. Donor site complications were reactionary haemorrhage 1 patient, stay suture lip injury 1, pain and numbness in 6 (9.6%) patients. Superficial wound infections were recorded in 6(9.7%) patients. The duration of follow-up ranged from 1-29 months; mean 6 months. There was no mortality. Conclusion: Panurethral strictures are common in our practice mainly resulting as complication of poorly treated urethritis and urethral catheterization. Urethral reconstruction by one-stage oral mucosa graft urethroplasty is feasible, has good, short-term outcome though it may be associated with minor donor site complications. Larger number of patients and longer- term follow up are needed to assess the durability of the procedure.http://www.ejos.org/index.php?fulltxt=77922&fulltxtj=136&fulltxtp=136-1576253234.pdfpanurethral stricturesoral mucosa grafts
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ngwobia Peter Agwu, Ismaila Arzika Mungadi
spellingShingle Ngwobia Peter Agwu, Ismaila Arzika Mungadi
Oral mucosal grafts in one-stage urethroplasty for panurethral strictures
International Journal of Surgery and Medicine
panurethral strictures
oral mucosa grafts
author_facet Ngwobia Peter Agwu, Ismaila Arzika Mungadi
author_sort Ngwobia Peter Agwu, Ismaila Arzika Mungadi
title Oral mucosal grafts in one-stage urethroplasty for panurethral strictures
title_short Oral mucosal grafts in one-stage urethroplasty for panurethral strictures
title_full Oral mucosal grafts in one-stage urethroplasty for panurethral strictures
title_fullStr Oral mucosal grafts in one-stage urethroplasty for panurethral strictures
title_full_unstemmed Oral mucosal grafts in one-stage urethroplasty for panurethral strictures
title_sort oral mucosal grafts in one-stage urethroplasty for panurethral strictures
publisher Bulgarian Association of Young Surgeons
series International Journal of Surgery and Medicine
issn 2367-699X
2367-699X
publishDate 2020-04-01
description Objectives: Panurethral strictures are complex and extensive strictures that involve the penile and bulbar urethra. Management of these patients is challenging. In the last two decades, oral mucosal grafts have gained widespread popularity as the most versatile substitute tissue for urethral reconstruction. This paper presents the short- term outcome of our experience in the use of oral mucosal grafts in one-stage urethroplasty in patients with panurethral strictures. Patients and Methods: Between April 2012 and January 2017, 62 men were evaluated and had one-stage oral mucosa urethroplasty for panurethral strictures. Results: The mean age of the patients was 50 years with a range of 11-75 years. Aetiological factors were poorly treated urethritis 39 (62.9%), indwelling urethral catheterization 18 (29.0%), trauma 1 (1.6%) and lichen sclerosis 1 (1.6%). Reasons for urethral catheterization were for intraoperative monitoring 9 (50.0 %), relief of acute urine retention 4 (22.2%) and others 4 (22.2%). Fifty-two patients (83.9%) had preliminary urinary diversion by supra-pubic cystostomy before urethroplasty. The mean OMG length was 11.7cm and donor sites were buccal in 37 (59.7%), combined buccal and labial in 20 (32.3%). Fifty-seven (88.7%) patients had satisfactory voiding on removal of the urethral catheter. Donor site complications were reactionary haemorrhage 1 patient, stay suture lip injury 1, pain and numbness in 6 (9.6%) patients. Superficial wound infections were recorded in 6(9.7%) patients. The duration of follow-up ranged from 1-29 months; mean 6 months. There was no mortality. Conclusion: Panurethral strictures are common in our practice mainly resulting as complication of poorly treated urethritis and urethral catheterization. Urethral reconstruction by one-stage oral mucosa graft urethroplasty is feasible, has good, short-term outcome though it may be associated with minor donor site complications. Larger number of patients and longer- term follow up are needed to assess the durability of the procedure.
topic panurethral strictures
oral mucosa grafts
url http://www.ejos.org/index.php?fulltxt=77922&fulltxtj=136&fulltxtp=136-1576253234.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ngwobiapeteragwuismailaarzikamungadi oralmucosalgraftsinonestageurethroplastyforpanurethralstrictures
_version_ 1721543647180095488