When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials – a practical guide with flowcharts

Abstract Background Missing data may seriously compromise inferences from randomised clinical trials, especially if missing data are not handled appropriately. The potential bias due to missing data depends on the mechanism causing the data to be missing, and the analytical methods applied to amend...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Janus Christian Jakobsen, Christian Gluud, Jørn Wetterslev, Per Winkel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-12-01
Series:BMC Medical Research Methodology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-017-0442-1
id doaj-1da0c2ef4e514b7fb7818310bd7e5a4e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1da0c2ef4e514b7fb7818310bd7e5a4e2020-11-25T01:46:55ZengBMCBMC Medical Research Methodology1471-22882017-12-0117111010.1186/s12874-017-0442-1When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials – a practical guide with flowchartsJanus Christian Jakobsen0Christian Gluud1Jørn Wetterslev2Per Winkel3The Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalThe Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalThe Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalThe Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAbstract Background Missing data may seriously compromise inferences from randomised clinical trials, especially if missing data are not handled appropriately. The potential bias due to missing data depends on the mechanism causing the data to be missing, and the analytical methods applied to amend the missingness. Therefore, the analysis of trial data with missing values requires careful planning and attention. Methods The authors had several meetings and discussions considering optimal ways of handling missing data to minimise the bias potential. We also searched PubMed (key words: missing data; randomi*; statistical analysis) and reference lists of known studies for papers (theoretical papers; empirical studies; simulation studies; etc.) on how to deal with missing data when analysing randomised clinical trials. Results Handling missing data is an important, yet difficult and complex task when analysing results of randomised clinical trials. We consider how to optimise the handling of missing data during the planning stage of a randomised clinical trial and recommend analytical approaches which may prevent bias caused by unavoidable missing data. We consider the strengths and limitations of using of best-worst and worst-best sensitivity analyses, multiple imputation, and full information maximum likelihood. We also present practical flowcharts on how to deal with missing data and an overview of the steps that always need to be considered during the analysis stage of a trial. Conclusions We present a practical guide and flowcharts describing when and how multiple imputation should be used to handle missing data in randomised clinical.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-017-0442-1Missing dataRandomised clinical trialsMultiple imputation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Janus Christian Jakobsen
Christian Gluud
Jørn Wetterslev
Per Winkel
spellingShingle Janus Christian Jakobsen
Christian Gluud
Jørn Wetterslev
Per Winkel
When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials – a practical guide with flowcharts
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Missing data
Randomised clinical trials
Multiple imputation
author_facet Janus Christian Jakobsen
Christian Gluud
Jørn Wetterslev
Per Winkel
author_sort Janus Christian Jakobsen
title When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials – a practical guide with flowcharts
title_short When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials – a practical guide with flowcharts
title_full When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials – a practical guide with flowcharts
title_fullStr When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials – a practical guide with flowcharts
title_full_unstemmed When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials – a practical guide with flowcharts
title_sort when and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials – a practical guide with flowcharts
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Research Methodology
issn 1471-2288
publishDate 2017-12-01
description Abstract Background Missing data may seriously compromise inferences from randomised clinical trials, especially if missing data are not handled appropriately. The potential bias due to missing data depends on the mechanism causing the data to be missing, and the analytical methods applied to amend the missingness. Therefore, the analysis of trial data with missing values requires careful planning and attention. Methods The authors had several meetings and discussions considering optimal ways of handling missing data to minimise the bias potential. We also searched PubMed (key words: missing data; randomi*; statistical analysis) and reference lists of known studies for papers (theoretical papers; empirical studies; simulation studies; etc.) on how to deal with missing data when analysing randomised clinical trials. Results Handling missing data is an important, yet difficult and complex task when analysing results of randomised clinical trials. We consider how to optimise the handling of missing data during the planning stage of a randomised clinical trial and recommend analytical approaches which may prevent bias caused by unavoidable missing data. We consider the strengths and limitations of using of best-worst and worst-best sensitivity analyses, multiple imputation, and full information maximum likelihood. We also present practical flowcharts on how to deal with missing data and an overview of the steps that always need to be considered during the analysis stage of a trial. Conclusions We present a practical guide and flowcharts describing when and how multiple imputation should be used to handle missing data in randomised clinical.
topic Missing data
Randomised clinical trials
Multiple imputation
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-017-0442-1
work_keys_str_mv AT januschristianjakobsen whenandhowshouldmultipleimputationbeusedforhandlingmissingdatainrandomisedclinicaltrialsapracticalguidewithflowcharts
AT christiangluud whenandhowshouldmultipleimputationbeusedforhandlingmissingdatainrandomisedclinicaltrialsapracticalguidewithflowcharts
AT jørnwetterslev whenandhowshouldmultipleimputationbeusedforhandlingmissingdatainrandomisedclinicaltrialsapracticalguidewithflowcharts
AT perwinkel whenandhowshouldmultipleimputationbeusedforhandlingmissingdatainrandomisedclinicaltrialsapracticalguidewithflowcharts
_version_ 1725017196162187264