Mesopic Functional Visual Acuity in Normal Subjects.

To evaluate mesopic functional visual acuity (FVA) with a newly developed system in normal subjects and to compare the results with photopic FVA, sixty-eight healthy volunteers (24.03 ± 4.42 [mean ± standard deviation] years) were enrolled in this study. A commercially available FVA measurement syst...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Takahiro Hiraoka, Sujin Hoshi, Yoshifumi Okamoto, Fumiki Okamoto, Tetsuro Oshika
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4517889?pdf=render
id doaj-1e5509a103b14da78f18c5c81e6dfe6e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1e5509a103b14da78f18c5c81e6dfe6e2020-11-25T01:18:47ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01107e013450510.1371/journal.pone.0134505Mesopic Functional Visual Acuity in Normal Subjects.Takahiro HiraokaSujin HoshiYoshifumi OkamotoFumiki OkamotoTetsuro OshikaTo evaluate mesopic functional visual acuity (FVA) with a newly developed system in normal subjects and to compare the results with photopic FVA, sixty-eight healthy volunteers (24.03 ± 4.42 [mean ± standard deviation] years) were enrolled in this study. A commercially available FVA measurement system (AS-28; Kowa, Aichi, Japan) was modified to measure FVA under mesopic conditions as well as photopic conditions. Measurements were performed monocularly in photopic conditions during 60 seconds. After dark adaptation for 15 minutes, the same measurements were repeated in mesopic conditions. Outcomes included starting visual acuity (VA), FVA (the average of VAs), visual maintenance ratio (VMR), maximum VA, minimum VA, and numbers of blinks during the 60-second measurement session, and were compared between mesopic and photopic conditions. Starting VA was -0.11 ± 0.08 and 0.39 ± 0.12 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in photopic and mesopic conditions, respectively. FVA was -0.06 ± 0.09 and 0.52 ± 0.14 logMAR, VMR was 0.98 ± 0.02 and 0.94 ± 0.04, maximum VA was -0.15 ± 0.06 and 0.33 ± 0.12 logMAR, the minimum VA was 0.05 ± 0.12 and 0.78 ± 0.20 logMAR, and the number of blinks was 8.23 ± 7.54 and 7.23 ± 6.20, respectively. All these parameters except the number of blinks were significantly different between the two conditions (P < 0.001). Besides, the difference between maximum and minimum VAs and standard deviation of VA were significantly larger in mesopic than in photopic conditions (P < 0.001). This study revealed that not only overall visual function decline but also instability of vision under mesopic conditions even in healthy subjects.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4517889?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Takahiro Hiraoka
Sujin Hoshi
Yoshifumi Okamoto
Fumiki Okamoto
Tetsuro Oshika
spellingShingle Takahiro Hiraoka
Sujin Hoshi
Yoshifumi Okamoto
Fumiki Okamoto
Tetsuro Oshika
Mesopic Functional Visual Acuity in Normal Subjects.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Takahiro Hiraoka
Sujin Hoshi
Yoshifumi Okamoto
Fumiki Okamoto
Tetsuro Oshika
author_sort Takahiro Hiraoka
title Mesopic Functional Visual Acuity in Normal Subjects.
title_short Mesopic Functional Visual Acuity in Normal Subjects.
title_full Mesopic Functional Visual Acuity in Normal Subjects.
title_fullStr Mesopic Functional Visual Acuity in Normal Subjects.
title_full_unstemmed Mesopic Functional Visual Acuity in Normal Subjects.
title_sort mesopic functional visual acuity in normal subjects.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description To evaluate mesopic functional visual acuity (FVA) with a newly developed system in normal subjects and to compare the results with photopic FVA, sixty-eight healthy volunteers (24.03 ± 4.42 [mean ± standard deviation] years) were enrolled in this study. A commercially available FVA measurement system (AS-28; Kowa, Aichi, Japan) was modified to measure FVA under mesopic conditions as well as photopic conditions. Measurements were performed monocularly in photopic conditions during 60 seconds. After dark adaptation for 15 minutes, the same measurements were repeated in mesopic conditions. Outcomes included starting visual acuity (VA), FVA (the average of VAs), visual maintenance ratio (VMR), maximum VA, minimum VA, and numbers of blinks during the 60-second measurement session, and were compared between mesopic and photopic conditions. Starting VA was -0.11 ± 0.08 and 0.39 ± 0.12 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in photopic and mesopic conditions, respectively. FVA was -0.06 ± 0.09 and 0.52 ± 0.14 logMAR, VMR was 0.98 ± 0.02 and 0.94 ± 0.04, maximum VA was -0.15 ± 0.06 and 0.33 ± 0.12 logMAR, the minimum VA was 0.05 ± 0.12 and 0.78 ± 0.20 logMAR, and the number of blinks was 8.23 ± 7.54 and 7.23 ± 6.20, respectively. All these parameters except the number of blinks were significantly different between the two conditions (P < 0.001). Besides, the difference between maximum and minimum VAs and standard deviation of VA were significantly larger in mesopic than in photopic conditions (P < 0.001). This study revealed that not only overall visual function decline but also instability of vision under mesopic conditions even in healthy subjects.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4517889?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT takahirohiraoka mesopicfunctionalvisualacuityinnormalsubjects
AT sujinhoshi mesopicfunctionalvisualacuityinnormalsubjects
AT yoshifumiokamoto mesopicfunctionalvisualacuityinnormalsubjects
AT fumikiokamoto mesopicfunctionalvisualacuityinnormalsubjects
AT tetsurooshika mesopicfunctionalvisualacuityinnormalsubjects
_version_ 1725140428745867264