Male genital morphology and its influence on female mating preferences and paternity success in guppies.

In internally fertilizing species male genitalia often show a higher degree of elaboration than required for simply transferring sperm to females. Among the hypotheses proposed to explain such diversity, sexual selection has received the most empirical support, with studies revealing that genital mo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Clelia Gasparini, Andrea Pilastro, Jonathan P Evans
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3142123?pdf=render
id doaj-2040f4ddbeb34053a6733a87a1cd30f0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2040f4ddbeb34053a6733a87a1cd30f02020-11-25T00:26:49ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032011-01-0167e2232910.1371/journal.pone.0022329Male genital morphology and its influence on female mating preferences and paternity success in guppies.Clelia GaspariniAndrea PilastroJonathan P EvansIn internally fertilizing species male genitalia often show a higher degree of elaboration than required for simply transferring sperm to females. Among the hypotheses proposed to explain such diversity, sexual selection has received the most empirical support, with studies revealing that genital morphology can be targeted by both pre-and postcopulatory sexual selection. Until now, most studies have focused on these two episodes of selection independently. Here, we take an alternative approach by considering both components simultaneously in the livebearing fish, Poecilia reticulata. We allowed females to mate successively (and cooperatively) with two males and determined whether male genital length influenced the female's propensity to mate with a male (precopulatory selection, via female choice) and whether male genital size and shape predicted the relative paternity share of subsequent broods (postcopulatory selection, via sperm competition/cryptic female choice). We found no evidence that either episode of sexual selection targets male genital size or shape. These findings, in conjunction with our recent work exposing a role of genital morphology in mediating unsolicited (forced) matings in guppies, further supports our prior speculation that sexual conflict may be an important broker of genital evolution in this species.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3142123?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Clelia Gasparini
Andrea Pilastro
Jonathan P Evans
spellingShingle Clelia Gasparini
Andrea Pilastro
Jonathan P Evans
Male genital morphology and its influence on female mating preferences and paternity success in guppies.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Clelia Gasparini
Andrea Pilastro
Jonathan P Evans
author_sort Clelia Gasparini
title Male genital morphology and its influence on female mating preferences and paternity success in guppies.
title_short Male genital morphology and its influence on female mating preferences and paternity success in guppies.
title_full Male genital morphology and its influence on female mating preferences and paternity success in guppies.
title_fullStr Male genital morphology and its influence on female mating preferences and paternity success in guppies.
title_full_unstemmed Male genital morphology and its influence on female mating preferences and paternity success in guppies.
title_sort male genital morphology and its influence on female mating preferences and paternity success in guppies.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2011-01-01
description In internally fertilizing species male genitalia often show a higher degree of elaboration than required for simply transferring sperm to females. Among the hypotheses proposed to explain such diversity, sexual selection has received the most empirical support, with studies revealing that genital morphology can be targeted by both pre-and postcopulatory sexual selection. Until now, most studies have focused on these two episodes of selection independently. Here, we take an alternative approach by considering both components simultaneously in the livebearing fish, Poecilia reticulata. We allowed females to mate successively (and cooperatively) with two males and determined whether male genital length influenced the female's propensity to mate with a male (precopulatory selection, via female choice) and whether male genital size and shape predicted the relative paternity share of subsequent broods (postcopulatory selection, via sperm competition/cryptic female choice). We found no evidence that either episode of sexual selection targets male genital size or shape. These findings, in conjunction with our recent work exposing a role of genital morphology in mediating unsolicited (forced) matings in guppies, further supports our prior speculation that sexual conflict may be an important broker of genital evolution in this species.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3142123?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT cleliagasparini malegenitalmorphologyanditsinfluenceonfemalematingpreferencesandpaternitysuccessinguppies
AT andreapilastro malegenitalmorphologyanditsinfluenceonfemalematingpreferencesandpaternitysuccessinguppies
AT jonathanpevans malegenitalmorphologyanditsinfluenceonfemalematingpreferencesandpaternitysuccessinguppies
_version_ 1725342315046764544