Radiology artificial intelligence, a systematic evaluation of methods (RAISE): a systematic review protocol
Abstract Introduction There has been a recent explosion of research into the field of artificial intelligence as applied to clinical radiology with the advent of highly accurate computer vision technology. These studies, however, vary significantly in design and quality. While recent guidelines have...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Insights into Imaging |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00929-9 |
id |
doaj-20fea13f8c214a8b86af04de967631d4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-20fea13f8c214a8b86af04de967631d42020-12-13T12:20:01ZengSpringerOpenInsights into Imaging1869-41012020-12-011111610.1186/s13244-020-00929-9Radiology artificial intelligence, a systematic evaluation of methods (RAISE): a systematic review protocolBrendan Kelly0Conor Judge1Stephanie M. Bollard2Simon M. Clifford3Gerard M. Healy4Kristen W. Yeom5Aonghus Lawlor6Ronan P. Killeen7St Vincent’s University HospitalWellcome Trust – HRB, Irish Clinical Academic TrainingWellcome Trust – HRB, Irish Clinical Academic TrainingSt Vincent’s University HospitalSt Vincent’s University HospitalLucille Packard Children’s Hospital at StanfordInsight Centre for Data Analytics, UCDSt Vincent’s University HospitalAbstract Introduction There has been a recent explosion of research into the field of artificial intelligence as applied to clinical radiology with the advent of highly accurate computer vision technology. These studies, however, vary significantly in design and quality. While recent guidelines have been established to advise on ethics, data management and the potential directions of future research, systematic reviews of the entire field are lacking. We aim to investigate the use of artificial intelligence as applied to radiology, to identify the clinical questions being asked, which methodological approaches are applied to these questions and trends in use over time. Methods and analysis We will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines and by the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook. We will perform a literature search through MEDLINE (Pubmed), and EMBASE, a detailed data extraction of trial characteristics and a narrative synthesis of the data. There will be no language restrictions. We will take a task-centred approach rather than focusing on modality or clinical subspecialty. Sub-group analysis will be performed by segmentation tasks, identification tasks, classification tasks, pegression/prediction tasks as well as a sub-analysis for paediatric patients. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval will not be required for this study, as data will be obtained from publicly available clinical trials. We will disseminate our results in a peer-reviewed publication. Registration number PROSPERO: CRD42020154790https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00929-9RadiologyArtificial intelligenceSystematic reviewMethodology |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Brendan Kelly Conor Judge Stephanie M. Bollard Simon M. Clifford Gerard M. Healy Kristen W. Yeom Aonghus Lawlor Ronan P. Killeen |
spellingShingle |
Brendan Kelly Conor Judge Stephanie M. Bollard Simon M. Clifford Gerard M. Healy Kristen W. Yeom Aonghus Lawlor Ronan P. Killeen Radiology artificial intelligence, a systematic evaluation of methods (RAISE): a systematic review protocol Insights into Imaging Radiology Artificial intelligence Systematic review Methodology |
author_facet |
Brendan Kelly Conor Judge Stephanie M. Bollard Simon M. Clifford Gerard M. Healy Kristen W. Yeom Aonghus Lawlor Ronan P. Killeen |
author_sort |
Brendan Kelly |
title |
Radiology artificial intelligence, a systematic evaluation of methods (RAISE): a systematic review protocol |
title_short |
Radiology artificial intelligence, a systematic evaluation of methods (RAISE): a systematic review protocol |
title_full |
Radiology artificial intelligence, a systematic evaluation of methods (RAISE): a systematic review protocol |
title_fullStr |
Radiology artificial intelligence, a systematic evaluation of methods (RAISE): a systematic review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed |
Radiology artificial intelligence, a systematic evaluation of methods (RAISE): a systematic review protocol |
title_sort |
radiology artificial intelligence, a systematic evaluation of methods (raise): a systematic review protocol |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
Insights into Imaging |
issn |
1869-4101 |
publishDate |
2020-12-01 |
description |
Abstract Introduction There has been a recent explosion of research into the field of artificial intelligence as applied to clinical radiology with the advent of highly accurate computer vision technology. These studies, however, vary significantly in design and quality. While recent guidelines have been established to advise on ethics, data management and the potential directions of future research, systematic reviews of the entire field are lacking. We aim to investigate the use of artificial intelligence as applied to radiology, to identify the clinical questions being asked, which methodological approaches are applied to these questions and trends in use over time. Methods and analysis We will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines and by the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook. We will perform a literature search through MEDLINE (Pubmed), and EMBASE, a detailed data extraction of trial characteristics and a narrative synthesis of the data. There will be no language restrictions. We will take a task-centred approach rather than focusing on modality or clinical subspecialty. Sub-group analysis will be performed by segmentation tasks, identification tasks, classification tasks, pegression/prediction tasks as well as a sub-analysis for paediatric patients. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval will not be required for this study, as data will be obtained from publicly available clinical trials. We will disseminate our results in a peer-reviewed publication. Registration number PROSPERO: CRD42020154790 |
topic |
Radiology Artificial intelligence Systematic review Methodology |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00929-9 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT brendankelly radiologyartificialintelligenceasystematicevaluationofmethodsraiseasystematicreviewprotocol AT conorjudge radiologyartificialintelligenceasystematicevaluationofmethodsraiseasystematicreviewprotocol AT stephaniembollard radiologyartificialintelligenceasystematicevaluationofmethodsraiseasystematicreviewprotocol AT simonmclifford radiologyartificialintelligenceasystematicevaluationofmethodsraiseasystematicreviewprotocol AT gerardmhealy radiologyartificialintelligenceasystematicevaluationofmethodsraiseasystematicreviewprotocol AT kristenwyeom radiologyartificialintelligenceasystematicevaluationofmethodsraiseasystematicreviewprotocol AT aonghuslawlor radiologyartificialintelligenceasystematicevaluationofmethodsraiseasystematicreviewprotocol AT ronanpkilleen radiologyartificialintelligenceasystematicevaluationofmethodsraiseasystematicreviewprotocol |
_version_ |
1724384859994980352 |