Radiology artificial intelligence, a systematic evaluation of methods (RAISE): a systematic review protocol

Abstract Introduction There has been a recent explosion of research into the field of artificial intelligence as applied to clinical radiology with the advent of highly accurate computer vision technology. These studies, however, vary significantly in design and quality. While recent guidelines have...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brendan Kelly, Conor Judge, Stephanie M. Bollard, Simon M. Clifford, Gerard M. Healy, Kristen W. Yeom, Aonghus Lawlor, Ronan P. Killeen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2020-12-01
Series:Insights into Imaging
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00929-9
id doaj-20fea13f8c214a8b86af04de967631d4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-20fea13f8c214a8b86af04de967631d42020-12-13T12:20:01ZengSpringerOpenInsights into Imaging1869-41012020-12-011111610.1186/s13244-020-00929-9Radiology artificial intelligence, a systematic evaluation of methods (RAISE): a systematic review protocolBrendan Kelly0Conor Judge1Stephanie M. Bollard2Simon M. Clifford3Gerard M. Healy4Kristen W. Yeom5Aonghus Lawlor6Ronan P. Killeen7St Vincent’s University HospitalWellcome Trust – HRB, Irish Clinical Academic TrainingWellcome Trust – HRB, Irish Clinical Academic TrainingSt Vincent’s University HospitalSt Vincent’s University HospitalLucille Packard Children’s Hospital at StanfordInsight Centre for Data Analytics, UCDSt Vincent’s University HospitalAbstract Introduction There has been a recent explosion of research into the field of artificial intelligence as applied to clinical radiology with the advent of highly accurate computer vision technology. These studies, however, vary significantly in design and quality. While recent guidelines have been established to advise on ethics, data management and the potential directions of future research, systematic reviews of the entire field are lacking. We aim to investigate the use of artificial intelligence as applied to radiology, to identify the clinical questions being asked, which methodological approaches are applied to these questions and trends in use over time. Methods and analysis We will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines and by the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook. We will perform a literature search through MEDLINE (Pubmed), and EMBASE, a detailed data extraction of trial characteristics and a narrative synthesis of the data. There will be no language restrictions. We will take a task-centred approach rather than focusing on modality or clinical subspecialty. Sub-group analysis will be performed by segmentation tasks, identification tasks, classification tasks, pegression/prediction tasks as well as a sub-analysis for paediatric patients. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval will not be required for this study, as data will be obtained from publicly available clinical trials. We will disseminate our results in a peer-reviewed publication. Registration number PROSPERO: CRD42020154790https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00929-9RadiologyArtificial intelligenceSystematic reviewMethodology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Brendan Kelly
Conor Judge
Stephanie M. Bollard
Simon M. Clifford
Gerard M. Healy
Kristen W. Yeom
Aonghus Lawlor
Ronan P. Killeen
spellingShingle Brendan Kelly
Conor Judge
Stephanie M. Bollard
Simon M. Clifford
Gerard M. Healy
Kristen W. Yeom
Aonghus Lawlor
Ronan P. Killeen
Radiology artificial intelligence, a systematic evaluation of methods (RAISE): a systematic review protocol
Insights into Imaging
Radiology
Artificial intelligence
Systematic review
Methodology
author_facet Brendan Kelly
Conor Judge
Stephanie M. Bollard
Simon M. Clifford
Gerard M. Healy
Kristen W. Yeom
Aonghus Lawlor
Ronan P. Killeen
author_sort Brendan Kelly
title Radiology artificial intelligence, a systematic evaluation of methods (RAISE): a systematic review protocol
title_short Radiology artificial intelligence, a systematic evaluation of methods (RAISE): a systematic review protocol
title_full Radiology artificial intelligence, a systematic evaluation of methods (RAISE): a systematic review protocol
title_fullStr Radiology artificial intelligence, a systematic evaluation of methods (RAISE): a systematic review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Radiology artificial intelligence, a systematic evaluation of methods (RAISE): a systematic review protocol
title_sort radiology artificial intelligence, a systematic evaluation of methods (raise): a systematic review protocol
publisher SpringerOpen
series Insights into Imaging
issn 1869-4101
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Abstract Introduction There has been a recent explosion of research into the field of artificial intelligence as applied to clinical radiology with the advent of highly accurate computer vision technology. These studies, however, vary significantly in design and quality. While recent guidelines have been established to advise on ethics, data management and the potential directions of future research, systematic reviews of the entire field are lacking. We aim to investigate the use of artificial intelligence as applied to radiology, to identify the clinical questions being asked, which methodological approaches are applied to these questions and trends in use over time. Methods and analysis We will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines and by the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook. We will perform a literature search through MEDLINE (Pubmed), and EMBASE, a detailed data extraction of trial characteristics and a narrative synthesis of the data. There will be no language restrictions. We will take a task-centred approach rather than focusing on modality or clinical subspecialty. Sub-group analysis will be performed by segmentation tasks, identification tasks, classification tasks, pegression/prediction tasks as well as a sub-analysis for paediatric patients. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval will not be required for this study, as data will be obtained from publicly available clinical trials. We will disseminate our results in a peer-reviewed publication. Registration number PROSPERO: CRD42020154790
topic Radiology
Artificial intelligence
Systematic review
Methodology
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00929-9
work_keys_str_mv AT brendankelly radiologyartificialintelligenceasystematicevaluationofmethodsraiseasystematicreviewprotocol
AT conorjudge radiologyartificialintelligenceasystematicevaluationofmethodsraiseasystematicreviewprotocol
AT stephaniembollard radiologyartificialintelligenceasystematicevaluationofmethodsraiseasystematicreviewprotocol
AT simonmclifford radiologyartificialintelligenceasystematicevaluationofmethodsraiseasystematicreviewprotocol
AT gerardmhealy radiologyartificialintelligenceasystematicevaluationofmethodsraiseasystematicreviewprotocol
AT kristenwyeom radiologyartificialintelligenceasystematicevaluationofmethodsraiseasystematicreviewprotocol
AT aonghuslawlor radiologyartificialintelligenceasystematicevaluationofmethodsraiseasystematicreviewprotocol
AT ronanpkilleen radiologyartificialintelligenceasystematicevaluationofmethodsraiseasystematicreviewprotocol
_version_ 1724384859994980352