The pupillary light response reveals the focus of covert visual attention.
The pupillary light response is often assumed to be a reflex that is not susceptible to cognitive influences. In line with recent converging evidence, we show that this reflexive view is incomplete, and that the pupillary light response is modulated by covert visual attention: Covertly attending to...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2013-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3812139?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-22d530fa3bdc464c8a7ccf6bdafb1716 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-22d530fa3bdc464c8a7ccf6bdafb17162020-11-25T01:58:56ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-01810e7816810.1371/journal.pone.0078168The pupillary light response reveals the focus of covert visual attention.Sebastiaan MathôtLotje van der LindenJonathan GraingerFrançoise VituThe pupillary light response is often assumed to be a reflex that is not susceptible to cognitive influences. In line with recent converging evidence, we show that this reflexive view is incomplete, and that the pupillary light response is modulated by covert visual attention: Covertly attending to a bright area causes a pupillary constriction, relative to attending to a dark area under identical visual input. This attention-related modulation of the pupillary light response predicts cuing effects in behavior, and can be used as an index of how strongly participants attend to a particular location. Therefore, we suggest that pupil size may offer a new way to continuously track the focus of covert visual attention, without requiring a manual response from the participant. The theoretical implication of this finding is that the pupillary light response is neither fully reflexive, nor under complete voluntary control, but is instead best characterized as a stereotyped response to a voluntarily selected target. In this sense, the pupillary light response is similar to saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movements. Together, eye movements and the pupillary light response maximize visual acuity, stabilize visual input, and selectively filter visual information as it enters the eye.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3812139?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sebastiaan Mathôt Lotje van der Linden Jonathan Grainger Françoise Vitu |
spellingShingle |
Sebastiaan Mathôt Lotje van der Linden Jonathan Grainger Françoise Vitu The pupillary light response reveals the focus of covert visual attention. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Sebastiaan Mathôt Lotje van der Linden Jonathan Grainger Françoise Vitu |
author_sort |
Sebastiaan Mathôt |
title |
The pupillary light response reveals the focus of covert visual attention. |
title_short |
The pupillary light response reveals the focus of covert visual attention. |
title_full |
The pupillary light response reveals the focus of covert visual attention. |
title_fullStr |
The pupillary light response reveals the focus of covert visual attention. |
title_full_unstemmed |
The pupillary light response reveals the focus of covert visual attention. |
title_sort |
pupillary light response reveals the focus of covert visual attention. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2013-01-01 |
description |
The pupillary light response is often assumed to be a reflex that is not susceptible to cognitive influences. In line with recent converging evidence, we show that this reflexive view is incomplete, and that the pupillary light response is modulated by covert visual attention: Covertly attending to a bright area causes a pupillary constriction, relative to attending to a dark area under identical visual input. This attention-related modulation of the pupillary light response predicts cuing effects in behavior, and can be used as an index of how strongly participants attend to a particular location. Therefore, we suggest that pupil size may offer a new way to continuously track the focus of covert visual attention, without requiring a manual response from the participant. The theoretical implication of this finding is that the pupillary light response is neither fully reflexive, nor under complete voluntary control, but is instead best characterized as a stereotyped response to a voluntarily selected target. In this sense, the pupillary light response is similar to saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movements. Together, eye movements and the pupillary light response maximize visual acuity, stabilize visual input, and selectively filter visual information as it enters the eye. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3812139?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sebastiaanmathot thepupillarylightresponserevealsthefocusofcovertvisualattention AT lotjevanderlinden thepupillarylightresponserevealsthefocusofcovertvisualattention AT jonathangrainger thepupillarylightresponserevealsthefocusofcovertvisualattention AT francoisevitu thepupillarylightresponserevealsthefocusofcovertvisualattention AT sebastiaanmathot pupillarylightresponserevealsthefocusofcovertvisualattention AT lotjevanderlinden pupillarylightresponserevealsthefocusofcovertvisualattention AT jonathangrainger pupillarylightresponserevealsthefocusofcovertvisualattention AT francoisevitu pupillarylightresponserevealsthefocusofcovertvisualattention |
_version_ |
1724967086899331072 |