Kritik Nalar Hermeneutika Paul Ricoeur

Hermeneutics was born and developed in the West, specifically in response to the theological problem of Christianity, and always claimed to be an effective solution to the interpretation of Scripture. With existence of various schools, hermeneutics has also various shades and resulted different inte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Daden Robi Rahman
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: Universitas Darussalam Gontor 2016-03-01
Series:Kalimah
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ejournal.unida.gontor.ac.id/index.php/kalimah/article/view/360
id doaj-2599076f930d498f9e9ead3b4474722f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2599076f930d498f9e9ead3b4474722f2020-11-25T00:50:07ZaraUniversitas Darussalam GontorKalimah1412-95902477-03962016-03-01141375210.21111/klm.v14i1.360334Kritik Nalar Hermeneutika Paul RicoeurDaden Robi Rahman0Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam (STAI) PersisHermeneutics was born and developed in the West, specifically in response to the theological problem of Christianity, and always claimed to be an effective solution to the interpretation of Scripture. With existence of various schools, hermeneutics has also various shades and resulted different interpretations. Such as Schleiermacher, followed by Wilhelm Dilthey and Emilio Betti as initiators of hermeneutics methodology. Martin Heidegger and Gadamer followed with their ontological hermeneutics, and continued by Habermas with his critical hermeneutics. After that, the critical ontological hermeneutics initiated by either Paul Ricoeur, or Rudolf Bultman with his theological hermeneutics, and Derrida with his deconstructive hermeneutics. Among those schools, the writers interested in reviewing the hermeneutics of Paul Ricoeur which represents a distinctive theory of interpretation. His idea considered to be a bridge of the fierce debate between methodological traditions and philosophical traditions represented by Emilio Betti and Hans Georg Gadamer. The thought of Ricoeur was also claimed as a mediator between the positions of the romantic tradition of Schleiermacher and Dilthey with philosophy hermeneutic by Martin Heidegger. In another side, he was placed as a combination between the two great philosophical tradition, that’s German phenomenology and France structuralism. Furthermore, the thought of Ricoeur is a revision to the thought of Dilthey about explanation (erklären) and understanding (verstehen). Through this paper, the writer will attempt to unravel the thought of Paul Ricoeur, and in the end, will clearly known the position of Ricoeur among other hermeneutics initiators.https://ejournal.unida.gontor.ac.id/index.php/kalimah/article/view/360HermeneuticPaul RicoeurInterpretationPhenomenologyStructuralismOntologicalMethodological
collection DOAJ
language Arabic
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daden Robi Rahman
spellingShingle Daden Robi Rahman
Kritik Nalar Hermeneutika Paul Ricoeur
Kalimah
Hermeneutic
Paul Ricoeur
Interpretation
Phenomenology
Structuralism
Ontological
Methodological
author_facet Daden Robi Rahman
author_sort Daden Robi Rahman
title Kritik Nalar Hermeneutika Paul Ricoeur
title_short Kritik Nalar Hermeneutika Paul Ricoeur
title_full Kritik Nalar Hermeneutika Paul Ricoeur
title_fullStr Kritik Nalar Hermeneutika Paul Ricoeur
title_full_unstemmed Kritik Nalar Hermeneutika Paul Ricoeur
title_sort kritik nalar hermeneutika paul ricoeur
publisher Universitas Darussalam Gontor
series Kalimah
issn 1412-9590
2477-0396
publishDate 2016-03-01
description Hermeneutics was born and developed in the West, specifically in response to the theological problem of Christianity, and always claimed to be an effective solution to the interpretation of Scripture. With existence of various schools, hermeneutics has also various shades and resulted different interpretations. Such as Schleiermacher, followed by Wilhelm Dilthey and Emilio Betti as initiators of hermeneutics methodology. Martin Heidegger and Gadamer followed with their ontological hermeneutics, and continued by Habermas with his critical hermeneutics. After that, the critical ontological hermeneutics initiated by either Paul Ricoeur, or Rudolf Bultman with his theological hermeneutics, and Derrida with his deconstructive hermeneutics. Among those schools, the writers interested in reviewing the hermeneutics of Paul Ricoeur which represents a distinctive theory of interpretation. His idea considered to be a bridge of the fierce debate between methodological traditions and philosophical traditions represented by Emilio Betti and Hans Georg Gadamer. The thought of Ricoeur was also claimed as a mediator between the positions of the romantic tradition of Schleiermacher and Dilthey with philosophy hermeneutic by Martin Heidegger. In another side, he was placed as a combination between the two great philosophical tradition, that’s German phenomenology and France structuralism. Furthermore, the thought of Ricoeur is a revision to the thought of Dilthey about explanation (erklären) and understanding (verstehen). Through this paper, the writer will attempt to unravel the thought of Paul Ricoeur, and in the end, will clearly known the position of Ricoeur among other hermeneutics initiators.
topic Hermeneutic
Paul Ricoeur
Interpretation
Phenomenology
Structuralism
Ontological
Methodological
url https://ejournal.unida.gontor.ac.id/index.php/kalimah/article/view/360
work_keys_str_mv AT dadenrobirahman kritiknalarhermeneutikapaulricoeur
_version_ 1725249283286892544