Comparison of Different Cervical Finish Lines of All-Ceramic Crowns on Primary Molars in Finite Element Analysis

This study aimed to conduct a stress analysis of four types of cervical finish lines in posterior all-ceramic crowns on the primary roots of molar teeth. Four different types of finish lines (shoulder 0.5 mm, feather-edged, chamfer 0.6 mm, and mini chamfer 0.4 mm) and two all-ceramic crown materials...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chin-Yun Pan, Ting-Hsun Lan, Pao-Hsin Liu, Wan-Ru Fu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-03-01
Series:Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/5/1094
id doaj-296e0254377e4493b13b74f27b0dbd68
record_format Article
spelling doaj-296e0254377e4493b13b74f27b0dbd682020-11-25T01:19:53ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442020-03-01135109410.3390/ma13051094ma13051094Comparison of Different Cervical Finish Lines of All-Ceramic Crowns on Primary Molars in Finite Element AnalysisChin-Yun Pan0Ting-Hsun Lan1Pao-Hsin Liu2Wan-Ru Fu3Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80756, TaiwanDivision of Prosthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80756, TaiwanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering I-Shou University, Kaohsiung 82442, TaiwanDepartment of Stomatology, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung 81362, TaiwanThis study aimed to conduct a stress analysis of four types of cervical finish lines in posterior all-ceramic crowns on the primary roots of molar teeth. Four different types of finish lines (shoulder 0.5 mm, feather-edged, chamfer 0.6 mm, and mini chamfer 0.4 mm) and two all-ceramic crown materials (zirconia and lithium disilicate) were used to construct eight finite element primary tooth models with full-coverage crowns. A load of 200 N was applied at two different loading angles (0&#176; and 15&#176;) so as to mimic children&#8217;s masticatory force and occlusal tendency. The maximum stress distribution from the three-dimensional finite element models was determined, and the main effect of each factor (loading type, material, and finish line types) was evaluated in terms of the stress values for all of the models. The results indicated that the loading type (90.25%) was the main factor influencing the maximum stress value of the primary root, and that the feather-edged margin showed the highest stress value (<i>p</i> = 0.002). In conclusion, shoulder and chamfer types of finish lines with a 0.4&#8722;0.6 mm thickness are recommended for deciduous tooth preparation, according to the biomechanical analysis.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/5/1094deciduous teethstress analysisall-ceramic crowncervical finish line
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chin-Yun Pan
Ting-Hsun Lan
Pao-Hsin Liu
Wan-Ru Fu
spellingShingle Chin-Yun Pan
Ting-Hsun Lan
Pao-Hsin Liu
Wan-Ru Fu
Comparison of Different Cervical Finish Lines of All-Ceramic Crowns on Primary Molars in Finite Element Analysis
Materials
deciduous teeth
stress analysis
all-ceramic crown
cervical finish line
author_facet Chin-Yun Pan
Ting-Hsun Lan
Pao-Hsin Liu
Wan-Ru Fu
author_sort Chin-Yun Pan
title Comparison of Different Cervical Finish Lines of All-Ceramic Crowns on Primary Molars in Finite Element Analysis
title_short Comparison of Different Cervical Finish Lines of All-Ceramic Crowns on Primary Molars in Finite Element Analysis
title_full Comparison of Different Cervical Finish Lines of All-Ceramic Crowns on Primary Molars in Finite Element Analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of Different Cervical Finish Lines of All-Ceramic Crowns on Primary Molars in Finite Element Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Different Cervical Finish Lines of All-Ceramic Crowns on Primary Molars in Finite Element Analysis
title_sort comparison of different cervical finish lines of all-ceramic crowns on primary molars in finite element analysis
publisher MDPI AG
series Materials
issn 1996-1944
publishDate 2020-03-01
description This study aimed to conduct a stress analysis of four types of cervical finish lines in posterior all-ceramic crowns on the primary roots of molar teeth. Four different types of finish lines (shoulder 0.5 mm, feather-edged, chamfer 0.6 mm, and mini chamfer 0.4 mm) and two all-ceramic crown materials (zirconia and lithium disilicate) were used to construct eight finite element primary tooth models with full-coverage crowns. A load of 200 N was applied at two different loading angles (0&#176; and 15&#176;) so as to mimic children&#8217;s masticatory force and occlusal tendency. The maximum stress distribution from the three-dimensional finite element models was determined, and the main effect of each factor (loading type, material, and finish line types) was evaluated in terms of the stress values for all of the models. The results indicated that the loading type (90.25%) was the main factor influencing the maximum stress value of the primary root, and that the feather-edged margin showed the highest stress value (<i>p</i> = 0.002). In conclusion, shoulder and chamfer types of finish lines with a 0.4&#8722;0.6 mm thickness are recommended for deciduous tooth preparation, according to the biomechanical analysis.
topic deciduous teeth
stress analysis
all-ceramic crown
cervical finish line
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/5/1094
work_keys_str_mv AT chinyunpan comparisonofdifferentcervicalfinishlinesofallceramiccrownsonprimarymolarsinfiniteelementanalysis
AT tinghsunlan comparisonofdifferentcervicalfinishlinesofallceramiccrownsonprimarymolarsinfiniteelementanalysis
AT paohsinliu comparisonofdifferentcervicalfinishlinesofallceramiccrownsonprimarymolarsinfiniteelementanalysis
AT wanrufu comparisonofdifferentcervicalfinishlinesofallceramiccrownsonprimarymolarsinfiniteelementanalysis
_version_ 1725136762540392448