China’s Wildlife Management Policy Framework: Preferences, Coordination and Optimization

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic led to global concerns about the delicate relationship between humans and wildlife. However, quantitative research on the elements of a wildlife management policy framework in a certain country is lacking. In this study, we try to close this research gap by anal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lu Feng, Qiyi Cai, Yang Bai, Wenjie Liao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-08-01
Series:Land
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/9/909
id doaj-2e38eea7b531434b890bc2266df05a4a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2e38eea7b531434b890bc2266df05a4a2021-09-26T00:33:14ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2021-08-011090990910.3390/land10090909China’s Wildlife Management Policy Framework: Preferences, Coordination and OptimizationLu Feng0Qiyi Cai1Yang Bai2Wenjie Liao3Law School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, ChinaLaw School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, ChinaLaw School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, ChinaInstitute of New Energy and Low-Carbon Technology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, ChinaThe coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic led to global concerns about the delicate relationship between humans and wildlife. However, quantitative research on the elements of a wildlife management policy framework in a certain country is lacking. In this study, we try to close this research gap by analyzing the formulation preferences of key elements in the wildlife management policy framework, as well as the coordination between them, in China, which is generally regarded as a main wildlife consumption country. Based on the content analysis of China’s wildlife management policy documents, with a three-dimensional analytical framework, we find that: China’s wildlife management policy framework prefers the use of compulsory tools, while voluntary and mixed tools are not fully used; adequate attention is paid to the biodiversity conservation objectives and attention is paid to the objectives of public health protection and wildlife welfare, while the utilization objective is restricted to some extent; government sectors, industry, citizens, and non-governmental organizations are involved in wildlife management policies and the degrees of participation of citizens and non-governmental organizations are relatively low. In conclusion, we draw wider implications for China’s wildlife management policy formulation, arguing for a more coordinated and participatory policy framework.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/9/909wildlife protectionbiodiversity conservationpolicy frameworkpolicy formulationChina
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lu Feng
Qiyi Cai
Yang Bai
Wenjie Liao
spellingShingle Lu Feng
Qiyi Cai
Yang Bai
Wenjie Liao
China’s Wildlife Management Policy Framework: Preferences, Coordination and Optimization
Land
wildlife protection
biodiversity conservation
policy framework
policy formulation
China
author_facet Lu Feng
Qiyi Cai
Yang Bai
Wenjie Liao
author_sort Lu Feng
title China’s Wildlife Management Policy Framework: Preferences, Coordination and Optimization
title_short China’s Wildlife Management Policy Framework: Preferences, Coordination and Optimization
title_full China’s Wildlife Management Policy Framework: Preferences, Coordination and Optimization
title_fullStr China’s Wildlife Management Policy Framework: Preferences, Coordination and Optimization
title_full_unstemmed China’s Wildlife Management Policy Framework: Preferences, Coordination and Optimization
title_sort china’s wildlife management policy framework: preferences, coordination and optimization
publisher MDPI AG
series Land
issn 2073-445X
publishDate 2021-08-01
description The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic led to global concerns about the delicate relationship between humans and wildlife. However, quantitative research on the elements of a wildlife management policy framework in a certain country is lacking. In this study, we try to close this research gap by analyzing the formulation preferences of key elements in the wildlife management policy framework, as well as the coordination between them, in China, which is generally regarded as a main wildlife consumption country. Based on the content analysis of China’s wildlife management policy documents, with a three-dimensional analytical framework, we find that: China’s wildlife management policy framework prefers the use of compulsory tools, while voluntary and mixed tools are not fully used; adequate attention is paid to the biodiversity conservation objectives and attention is paid to the objectives of public health protection and wildlife welfare, while the utilization objective is restricted to some extent; government sectors, industry, citizens, and non-governmental organizations are involved in wildlife management policies and the degrees of participation of citizens and non-governmental organizations are relatively low. In conclusion, we draw wider implications for China’s wildlife management policy formulation, arguing for a more coordinated and participatory policy framework.
topic wildlife protection
biodiversity conservation
policy framework
policy formulation
China
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/9/909
work_keys_str_mv AT lufeng chinaswildlifemanagementpolicyframeworkpreferencescoordinationandoptimization
AT qiyicai chinaswildlifemanagementpolicyframeworkpreferencescoordinationandoptimization
AT yangbai chinaswildlifemanagementpolicyframeworkpreferencescoordinationandoptimization
AT wenjieliao chinaswildlifemanagementpolicyframeworkpreferencescoordinationandoptimization
_version_ 1716870406410862592