Comparing Screening Abilities of the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-33) and the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist External Assessment (HCL-33-EA) for the Detection of Bipolar Disorder
Background: Bipolar disorder (BD) is a severe psychiatric disorder that is often misdiagnosed and under-diagnosed in clinical settings. The 33-item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-33) is a newly developed self-administered scale for BD detection, while the 33-item Hypomania Checklist-external assessment (H...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychiatry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.518722/full |
id |
doaj-2ec41d26611a41f09e3b34f5d2496152 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yuan-Yuan Wang Yuan Feng Meng Fang Chengwei Guo Gabor S. Ungvari Gabor S. Ungvari Brian J. Hall Brian J. Hall Gang Wang Yu-Tao Xiang Yu-Tao Xiang Yu-Tao Xiang |
spellingShingle |
Yuan-Yuan Wang Yuan Feng Meng Fang Chengwei Guo Gabor S. Ungvari Gabor S. Ungvari Brian J. Hall Brian J. Hall Gang Wang Yu-Tao Xiang Yu-Tao Xiang Yu-Tao Xiang Comparing Screening Abilities of the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-33) and the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist External Assessment (HCL-33-EA) for the Detection of Bipolar Disorder Frontiers in Psychiatry bipolar disorder sensitivity specificity HCL-33-EA HCL-33 |
author_facet |
Yuan-Yuan Wang Yuan Feng Meng Fang Chengwei Guo Gabor S. Ungvari Gabor S. Ungvari Brian J. Hall Brian J. Hall Gang Wang Yu-Tao Xiang Yu-Tao Xiang Yu-Tao Xiang |
author_sort |
Yuan-Yuan Wang |
title |
Comparing Screening Abilities of the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-33) and the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist External Assessment (HCL-33-EA) for the Detection of Bipolar Disorder |
title_short |
Comparing Screening Abilities of the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-33) and the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist External Assessment (HCL-33-EA) for the Detection of Bipolar Disorder |
title_full |
Comparing Screening Abilities of the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-33) and the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist External Assessment (HCL-33-EA) for the Detection of Bipolar Disorder |
title_fullStr |
Comparing Screening Abilities of the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-33) and the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist External Assessment (HCL-33-EA) for the Detection of Bipolar Disorder |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparing Screening Abilities of the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-33) and the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist External Assessment (HCL-33-EA) for the Detection of Bipolar Disorder |
title_sort |
comparing screening abilities of the 33-item hypomania checklist (hcl-33) and the 33-item hypomania checklist external assessment (hcl-33-ea) for the detection of bipolar disorder |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Psychiatry |
issn |
1664-0640 |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
Background: Bipolar disorder (BD) is a severe psychiatric disorder that is often misdiagnosed and under-diagnosed in clinical settings. The 33-item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-33) is a newly developed self-administered scale for BD detection, while the 33-item Hypomania Checklist-external assessment (HCL-33-EA) is a version of the HCL-33 for external rating used by patient's carer (e.g., family member or friend). We aimed to compare the screening abilities between the HCL-33 and the HCL-33-EA, and evaluate the screening consistency between the two scales.Methods: The data were collected from 269 patients with diagnosed BD (n = 84) or major depressive disorder (MDD) (n = 185). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) between the HCL-33 and the HCL-33-EA for BD were compared against clinician diagnosis as the gold standard.Results: Using Youden's index, the optimal cut-off value of the HCL-33 is 20, while the corresponding figure for HCL-33-EA is 11. Using Youden's index, the HCL-33-EA showed a better performance than the HCL-33 (0.51 vs.0.41). The HCL-33-EA was more sensitive in correctly identifying BD patients from MDD patients than the HCL-33 (0.83 vs. 0.59), while the HCL-33 presented better specificity than the HCL-33-EA (0.82 vs. 0.68). There was significant screening consistency between the two scales (p < 0.001).Conclusions: Both scales have acceptable psychometric properties in detection BD from MDD. Use of the two scales should be considered based on the assessment purpose in clinical research or daily practice (i.e., prefer sensitivity or specificity). Noticeably, the current sample size is insufficient and future studies are recommended to further evaluate the scales. |
topic |
bipolar disorder sensitivity specificity HCL-33-EA HCL-33 |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.518722/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yuanyuanwang comparingscreeningabilitiesofthe33itemhypomaniachecklisthcl33andthe33itemhypomaniachecklistexternalassessmenthcl33eaforthedetectionofbipolardisorder AT yuanfeng comparingscreeningabilitiesofthe33itemhypomaniachecklisthcl33andthe33itemhypomaniachecklistexternalassessmenthcl33eaforthedetectionofbipolardisorder AT mengfang comparingscreeningabilitiesofthe33itemhypomaniachecklisthcl33andthe33itemhypomaniachecklistexternalassessmenthcl33eaforthedetectionofbipolardisorder AT chengweiguo comparingscreeningabilitiesofthe33itemhypomaniachecklisthcl33andthe33itemhypomaniachecklistexternalassessmenthcl33eaforthedetectionofbipolardisorder AT gaborsungvari comparingscreeningabilitiesofthe33itemhypomaniachecklisthcl33andthe33itemhypomaniachecklistexternalassessmenthcl33eaforthedetectionofbipolardisorder AT gaborsungvari comparingscreeningabilitiesofthe33itemhypomaniachecklisthcl33andthe33itemhypomaniachecklistexternalassessmenthcl33eaforthedetectionofbipolardisorder AT brianjhall comparingscreeningabilitiesofthe33itemhypomaniachecklisthcl33andthe33itemhypomaniachecklistexternalassessmenthcl33eaforthedetectionofbipolardisorder AT brianjhall comparingscreeningabilitiesofthe33itemhypomaniachecklisthcl33andthe33itemhypomaniachecklistexternalassessmenthcl33eaforthedetectionofbipolardisorder AT gangwang comparingscreeningabilitiesofthe33itemhypomaniachecklisthcl33andthe33itemhypomaniachecklistexternalassessmenthcl33eaforthedetectionofbipolardisorder AT yutaoxiang comparingscreeningabilitiesofthe33itemhypomaniachecklisthcl33andthe33itemhypomaniachecklistexternalassessmenthcl33eaforthedetectionofbipolardisorder AT yutaoxiang comparingscreeningabilitiesofthe33itemhypomaniachecklisthcl33andthe33itemhypomaniachecklistexternalassessmenthcl33eaforthedetectionofbipolardisorder AT yutaoxiang comparingscreeningabilitiesofthe33itemhypomaniachecklisthcl33andthe33itemhypomaniachecklistexternalassessmenthcl33eaforthedetectionofbipolardisorder |
_version_ |
1721363675058536448 |
spelling |
doaj-2ec41d26611a41f09e3b34f5d24961522021-06-22T04:38:23ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychiatry1664-06402021-06-011210.3389/fpsyt.2021.518722518722Comparing Screening Abilities of the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-33) and the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist External Assessment (HCL-33-EA) for the Detection of Bipolar DisorderYuan-Yuan Wang0Yuan Feng1Meng Fang2Chengwei Guo3Gabor S. Ungvari4Gabor S. Ungvari5Brian J. Hall6Brian J. Hall7Gang Wang8Yu-Tao Xiang9Yu-Tao Xiang10Yu-Tao Xiang11Division of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, United KingdomThe National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital and the Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, ChinaThe National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital and the Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, ChinaThe National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital and the Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, ChinaUniversity of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, WA, AustraliaDivision of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Western Australia/Graylands Hospital, Perth, WA, AustraliaNew York University Shanghai, Shanghai, ChinaSchool of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, United StatesThe National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital and the Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, ChinaUnit of Psychiatry, Department of Public Health and Medicinal Administration, Institute of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, ChinaCentre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, ChinaInstitute of Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, ChinaBackground: Bipolar disorder (BD) is a severe psychiatric disorder that is often misdiagnosed and under-diagnosed in clinical settings. The 33-item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-33) is a newly developed self-administered scale for BD detection, while the 33-item Hypomania Checklist-external assessment (HCL-33-EA) is a version of the HCL-33 for external rating used by patient's carer (e.g., family member or friend). We aimed to compare the screening abilities between the HCL-33 and the HCL-33-EA, and evaluate the screening consistency between the two scales.Methods: The data were collected from 269 patients with diagnosed BD (n = 84) or major depressive disorder (MDD) (n = 185). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) between the HCL-33 and the HCL-33-EA for BD were compared against clinician diagnosis as the gold standard.Results: Using Youden's index, the optimal cut-off value of the HCL-33 is 20, while the corresponding figure for HCL-33-EA is 11. Using Youden's index, the HCL-33-EA showed a better performance than the HCL-33 (0.51 vs.0.41). The HCL-33-EA was more sensitive in correctly identifying BD patients from MDD patients than the HCL-33 (0.83 vs. 0.59), while the HCL-33 presented better specificity than the HCL-33-EA (0.82 vs. 0.68). There was significant screening consistency between the two scales (p < 0.001).Conclusions: Both scales have acceptable psychometric properties in detection BD from MDD. Use of the two scales should be considered based on the assessment purpose in clinical research or daily practice (i.e., prefer sensitivity or specificity). Noticeably, the current sample size is insufficient and future studies are recommended to further evaluate the scales.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.518722/fullbipolar disordersensitivityspecificityHCL-33-EAHCL-33 |