Comparing Screening Abilities of the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-33) and the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist External Assessment (HCL-33-EA) for the Detection of Bipolar Disorder

Background: Bipolar disorder (BD) is a severe psychiatric disorder that is often misdiagnosed and under-diagnosed in clinical settings. The 33-item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-33) is a newly developed self-administered scale for BD detection, while the 33-item Hypomania Checklist-external assessment (H...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuan-Yuan Wang, Yuan Feng, Meng Fang, Chengwei Guo, Gabor S. Ungvari, Brian J. Hall, Gang Wang, Yu-Tao Xiang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychiatry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.518722/full
id doaj-2ec41d26611a41f09e3b34f5d2496152
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yuan-Yuan Wang
Yuan Feng
Meng Fang
Chengwei Guo
Gabor S. Ungvari
Gabor S. Ungvari
Brian J. Hall
Brian J. Hall
Gang Wang
Yu-Tao Xiang
Yu-Tao Xiang
Yu-Tao Xiang
spellingShingle Yuan-Yuan Wang
Yuan Feng
Meng Fang
Chengwei Guo
Gabor S. Ungvari
Gabor S. Ungvari
Brian J. Hall
Brian J. Hall
Gang Wang
Yu-Tao Xiang
Yu-Tao Xiang
Yu-Tao Xiang
Comparing Screening Abilities of the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-33) and the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist External Assessment (HCL-33-EA) for the Detection of Bipolar Disorder
Frontiers in Psychiatry
bipolar disorder
sensitivity
specificity
HCL-33-EA
HCL-33
author_facet Yuan-Yuan Wang
Yuan Feng
Meng Fang
Chengwei Guo
Gabor S. Ungvari
Gabor S. Ungvari
Brian J. Hall
Brian J. Hall
Gang Wang
Yu-Tao Xiang
Yu-Tao Xiang
Yu-Tao Xiang
author_sort Yuan-Yuan Wang
title Comparing Screening Abilities of the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-33) and the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist External Assessment (HCL-33-EA) for the Detection of Bipolar Disorder
title_short Comparing Screening Abilities of the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-33) and the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist External Assessment (HCL-33-EA) for the Detection of Bipolar Disorder
title_full Comparing Screening Abilities of the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-33) and the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist External Assessment (HCL-33-EA) for the Detection of Bipolar Disorder
title_fullStr Comparing Screening Abilities of the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-33) and the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist External Assessment (HCL-33-EA) for the Detection of Bipolar Disorder
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Screening Abilities of the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-33) and the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist External Assessment (HCL-33-EA) for the Detection of Bipolar Disorder
title_sort comparing screening abilities of the 33-item hypomania checklist (hcl-33) and the 33-item hypomania checklist external assessment (hcl-33-ea) for the detection of bipolar disorder
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychiatry
issn 1664-0640
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Background: Bipolar disorder (BD) is a severe psychiatric disorder that is often misdiagnosed and under-diagnosed in clinical settings. The 33-item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-33) is a newly developed self-administered scale for BD detection, while the 33-item Hypomania Checklist-external assessment (HCL-33-EA) is a version of the HCL-33 for external rating used by patient's carer (e.g., family member or friend). We aimed to compare the screening abilities between the HCL-33 and the HCL-33-EA, and evaluate the screening consistency between the two scales.Methods: The data were collected from 269 patients with diagnosed BD (n = 84) or major depressive disorder (MDD) (n = 185). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) between the HCL-33 and the HCL-33-EA for BD were compared against clinician diagnosis as the gold standard.Results: Using Youden's index, the optimal cut-off value of the HCL-33 is 20, while the corresponding figure for HCL-33-EA is 11. Using Youden's index, the HCL-33-EA showed a better performance than the HCL-33 (0.51 vs.0.41). The HCL-33-EA was more sensitive in correctly identifying BD patients from MDD patients than the HCL-33 (0.83 vs. 0.59), while the HCL-33 presented better specificity than the HCL-33-EA (0.82 vs. 0.68). There was significant screening consistency between the two scales (p < 0.001).Conclusions: Both scales have acceptable psychometric properties in detection BD from MDD. Use of the two scales should be considered based on the assessment purpose in clinical research or daily practice (i.e., prefer sensitivity or specificity). Noticeably, the current sample size is insufficient and future studies are recommended to further evaluate the scales.
topic bipolar disorder
sensitivity
specificity
HCL-33-EA
HCL-33
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.518722/full
work_keys_str_mv AT yuanyuanwang comparingscreeningabilitiesofthe33itemhypomaniachecklisthcl33andthe33itemhypomaniachecklistexternalassessmenthcl33eaforthedetectionofbipolardisorder
AT yuanfeng comparingscreeningabilitiesofthe33itemhypomaniachecklisthcl33andthe33itemhypomaniachecklistexternalassessmenthcl33eaforthedetectionofbipolardisorder
AT mengfang comparingscreeningabilitiesofthe33itemhypomaniachecklisthcl33andthe33itemhypomaniachecklistexternalassessmenthcl33eaforthedetectionofbipolardisorder
AT chengweiguo comparingscreeningabilitiesofthe33itemhypomaniachecklisthcl33andthe33itemhypomaniachecklistexternalassessmenthcl33eaforthedetectionofbipolardisorder
AT gaborsungvari comparingscreeningabilitiesofthe33itemhypomaniachecklisthcl33andthe33itemhypomaniachecklistexternalassessmenthcl33eaforthedetectionofbipolardisorder
AT gaborsungvari comparingscreeningabilitiesofthe33itemhypomaniachecklisthcl33andthe33itemhypomaniachecklistexternalassessmenthcl33eaforthedetectionofbipolardisorder
AT brianjhall comparingscreeningabilitiesofthe33itemhypomaniachecklisthcl33andthe33itemhypomaniachecklistexternalassessmenthcl33eaforthedetectionofbipolardisorder
AT brianjhall comparingscreeningabilitiesofthe33itemhypomaniachecklisthcl33andthe33itemhypomaniachecklistexternalassessmenthcl33eaforthedetectionofbipolardisorder
AT gangwang comparingscreeningabilitiesofthe33itemhypomaniachecklisthcl33andthe33itemhypomaniachecklistexternalassessmenthcl33eaforthedetectionofbipolardisorder
AT yutaoxiang comparingscreeningabilitiesofthe33itemhypomaniachecklisthcl33andthe33itemhypomaniachecklistexternalassessmenthcl33eaforthedetectionofbipolardisorder
AT yutaoxiang comparingscreeningabilitiesofthe33itemhypomaniachecklisthcl33andthe33itemhypomaniachecklistexternalassessmenthcl33eaforthedetectionofbipolardisorder
AT yutaoxiang comparingscreeningabilitiesofthe33itemhypomaniachecklisthcl33andthe33itemhypomaniachecklistexternalassessmenthcl33eaforthedetectionofbipolardisorder
_version_ 1721363675058536448
spelling doaj-2ec41d26611a41f09e3b34f5d24961522021-06-22T04:38:23ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychiatry1664-06402021-06-011210.3389/fpsyt.2021.518722518722Comparing Screening Abilities of the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-33) and the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist External Assessment (HCL-33-EA) for the Detection of Bipolar DisorderYuan-Yuan Wang0Yuan Feng1Meng Fang2Chengwei Guo3Gabor S. Ungvari4Gabor S. Ungvari5Brian J. Hall6Brian J. Hall7Gang Wang8Yu-Tao Xiang9Yu-Tao Xiang10Yu-Tao Xiang11Division of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, United KingdomThe National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital and the Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, ChinaThe National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital and the Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, ChinaThe National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital and the Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, ChinaUniversity of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, WA, AustraliaDivision of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Western Australia/Graylands Hospital, Perth, WA, AustraliaNew York University Shanghai, Shanghai, ChinaSchool of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, United StatesThe National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital and the Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, ChinaUnit of Psychiatry, Department of Public Health and Medicinal Administration, Institute of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, ChinaCentre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, ChinaInstitute of Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, ChinaBackground: Bipolar disorder (BD) is a severe psychiatric disorder that is often misdiagnosed and under-diagnosed in clinical settings. The 33-item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-33) is a newly developed self-administered scale for BD detection, while the 33-item Hypomania Checklist-external assessment (HCL-33-EA) is a version of the HCL-33 for external rating used by patient's carer (e.g., family member or friend). We aimed to compare the screening abilities between the HCL-33 and the HCL-33-EA, and evaluate the screening consistency between the two scales.Methods: The data were collected from 269 patients with diagnosed BD (n = 84) or major depressive disorder (MDD) (n = 185). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) between the HCL-33 and the HCL-33-EA for BD were compared against clinician diagnosis as the gold standard.Results: Using Youden's index, the optimal cut-off value of the HCL-33 is 20, while the corresponding figure for HCL-33-EA is 11. Using Youden's index, the HCL-33-EA showed a better performance than the HCL-33 (0.51 vs.0.41). The HCL-33-EA was more sensitive in correctly identifying BD patients from MDD patients than the HCL-33 (0.83 vs. 0.59), while the HCL-33 presented better specificity than the HCL-33-EA (0.82 vs. 0.68). There was significant screening consistency between the two scales (p < 0.001).Conclusions: Both scales have acceptable psychometric properties in detection BD from MDD. Use of the two scales should be considered based on the assessment purpose in clinical research or daily practice (i.e., prefer sensitivity or specificity). Noticeably, the current sample size is insufficient and future studies are recommended to further evaluate the scales.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.518722/fullbipolar disordersensitivityspecificityHCL-33-EAHCL-33