Geographic Biases in Bee Research Limits Understanding of Species Distribution and Response to Anthropogenic Disturbance
Habitat loss and degradation due to agricultural intensification and urbanization are key threats facing wild pollinators, especially bees. However, data on the distribution and abundance of most of the world's 20,000+ bee species is lacking, making it difficult to assess the effects of anthrop...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019-06-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fevo.2019.00194/full |
id |
doaj-322925f12c04496582575a239e0075df |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-322925f12c04496582575a239e0075df2020-11-24T21:43:52ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution2296-701X2019-06-01710.3389/fevo.2019.00194458906Geographic Biases in Bee Research Limits Understanding of Species Distribution and Response to Anthropogenic DisturbanceMary A. Jamieson0Adrian L. Carper1Caleb J. Wilson2Caleb J. Wilson3Virginia L. Scott4Jason Gibbs5Department of Biological Sciences, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, United StatesDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, United StatesDepartment of Biological Sciences, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, United StatesDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United StatesEntomology Collection, University of Colorado Museum of Natural History, Boulder, CO, United StatesDepartment of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, CanadaHabitat loss and degradation due to agricultural intensification and urbanization are key threats facing wild pollinators, especially bees. However, data on the distribution and abundance of most of the world's 20,000+ bee species is lacking, making it difficult to assess the effects of anthropogenic disturbance through time. Moreover, there are geographic biases in the study of bees creating gaps in our understanding of species distributions and regional patterns of diversity. Research efforts are often focused around cities or field stations associated with universities and other research institutions. In this perspectives paper, we provide examples of geographic bias in knowledge regarding bee species distributions using recently collected data from Michigan and Colorado, USA—two states with published species checklists. We illustrate how a limited sampling effort can advance knowledge about bee species distributions, yielding species occurrence records at local and regional scales. Given the implications of geographic biases, we recommend future research efforts focus on poorly sampled geographic regions, especially those affected by anthropogenic disturbance, in order to expand our understanding of human impacts on wild bee species. Sampling across a broader geographic area will provide critical information for taxonomy and predictive models of bee species distributions and diversity. We encourage researchers to plan future studies with consideration of strategies to avoid oversampling local bee populations, the taxonomic expertise required to identify specimens, and resources necessary to voucher specimens.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fevo.2019.00194/fullbee declineland-use changepollinator conservationglobal changebee communities |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mary A. Jamieson Adrian L. Carper Caleb J. Wilson Caleb J. Wilson Virginia L. Scott Jason Gibbs |
spellingShingle |
Mary A. Jamieson Adrian L. Carper Caleb J. Wilson Caleb J. Wilson Virginia L. Scott Jason Gibbs Geographic Biases in Bee Research Limits Understanding of Species Distribution and Response to Anthropogenic Disturbance Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution bee decline land-use change pollinator conservation global change bee communities |
author_facet |
Mary A. Jamieson Adrian L. Carper Caleb J. Wilson Caleb J. Wilson Virginia L. Scott Jason Gibbs |
author_sort |
Mary A. Jamieson |
title |
Geographic Biases in Bee Research Limits Understanding of Species Distribution and Response to Anthropogenic Disturbance |
title_short |
Geographic Biases in Bee Research Limits Understanding of Species Distribution and Response to Anthropogenic Disturbance |
title_full |
Geographic Biases in Bee Research Limits Understanding of Species Distribution and Response to Anthropogenic Disturbance |
title_fullStr |
Geographic Biases in Bee Research Limits Understanding of Species Distribution and Response to Anthropogenic Disturbance |
title_full_unstemmed |
Geographic Biases in Bee Research Limits Understanding of Species Distribution and Response to Anthropogenic Disturbance |
title_sort |
geographic biases in bee research limits understanding of species distribution and response to anthropogenic disturbance |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution |
issn |
2296-701X |
publishDate |
2019-06-01 |
description |
Habitat loss and degradation due to agricultural intensification and urbanization are key threats facing wild pollinators, especially bees. However, data on the distribution and abundance of most of the world's 20,000+ bee species is lacking, making it difficult to assess the effects of anthropogenic disturbance through time. Moreover, there are geographic biases in the study of bees creating gaps in our understanding of species distributions and regional patterns of diversity. Research efforts are often focused around cities or field stations associated with universities and other research institutions. In this perspectives paper, we provide examples of geographic bias in knowledge regarding bee species distributions using recently collected data from Michigan and Colorado, USA—two states with published species checklists. We illustrate how a limited sampling effort can advance knowledge about bee species distributions, yielding species occurrence records at local and regional scales. Given the implications of geographic biases, we recommend future research efforts focus on poorly sampled geographic regions, especially those affected by anthropogenic disturbance, in order to expand our understanding of human impacts on wild bee species. Sampling across a broader geographic area will provide critical information for taxonomy and predictive models of bee species distributions and diversity. We encourage researchers to plan future studies with consideration of strategies to avoid oversampling local bee populations, the taxonomic expertise required to identify specimens, and resources necessary to voucher specimens. |
topic |
bee decline land-use change pollinator conservation global change bee communities |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fevo.2019.00194/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT maryajamieson geographicbiasesinbeeresearchlimitsunderstandingofspeciesdistributionandresponsetoanthropogenicdisturbance AT adrianlcarper geographicbiasesinbeeresearchlimitsunderstandingofspeciesdistributionandresponsetoanthropogenicdisturbance AT calebjwilson geographicbiasesinbeeresearchlimitsunderstandingofspeciesdistributionandresponsetoanthropogenicdisturbance AT calebjwilson geographicbiasesinbeeresearchlimitsunderstandingofspeciesdistributionandresponsetoanthropogenicdisturbance AT virginialscott geographicbiasesinbeeresearchlimitsunderstandingofspeciesdistributionandresponsetoanthropogenicdisturbance AT jasongibbs geographicbiasesinbeeresearchlimitsunderstandingofspeciesdistributionandresponsetoanthropogenicdisturbance |
_version_ |
1725911508454473728 |