Geographic Biases in Bee Research Limits Understanding of Species Distribution and Response to Anthropogenic Disturbance

Habitat loss and degradation due to agricultural intensification and urbanization are key threats facing wild pollinators, especially bees. However, data on the distribution and abundance of most of the world's 20,000+ bee species is lacking, making it difficult to assess the effects of anthrop...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mary A. Jamieson, Adrian L. Carper, Caleb J. Wilson, Virginia L. Scott, Jason Gibbs
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fevo.2019.00194/full
id doaj-322925f12c04496582575a239e0075df
record_format Article
spelling doaj-322925f12c04496582575a239e0075df2020-11-24T21:43:52ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution2296-701X2019-06-01710.3389/fevo.2019.00194458906Geographic Biases in Bee Research Limits Understanding of Species Distribution and Response to Anthropogenic DisturbanceMary A. Jamieson0Adrian L. Carper1Caleb J. Wilson2Caleb J. Wilson3Virginia L. Scott4Jason Gibbs5Department of Biological Sciences, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, United StatesDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, United StatesDepartment of Biological Sciences, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, United StatesDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United StatesEntomology Collection, University of Colorado Museum of Natural History, Boulder, CO, United StatesDepartment of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, CanadaHabitat loss and degradation due to agricultural intensification and urbanization are key threats facing wild pollinators, especially bees. However, data on the distribution and abundance of most of the world's 20,000+ bee species is lacking, making it difficult to assess the effects of anthropogenic disturbance through time. Moreover, there are geographic biases in the study of bees creating gaps in our understanding of species distributions and regional patterns of diversity. Research efforts are often focused around cities or field stations associated with universities and other research institutions. In this perspectives paper, we provide examples of geographic bias in knowledge regarding bee species distributions using recently collected data from Michigan and Colorado, USA—two states with published species checklists. We illustrate how a limited sampling effort can advance knowledge about bee species distributions, yielding species occurrence records at local and regional scales. Given the implications of geographic biases, we recommend future research efforts focus on poorly sampled geographic regions, especially those affected by anthropogenic disturbance, in order to expand our understanding of human impacts on wild bee species. Sampling across a broader geographic area will provide critical information for taxonomy and predictive models of bee species distributions and diversity. We encourage researchers to plan future studies with consideration of strategies to avoid oversampling local bee populations, the taxonomic expertise required to identify specimens, and resources necessary to voucher specimens.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fevo.2019.00194/fullbee declineland-use changepollinator conservationglobal changebee communities
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mary A. Jamieson
Adrian L. Carper
Caleb J. Wilson
Caleb J. Wilson
Virginia L. Scott
Jason Gibbs
spellingShingle Mary A. Jamieson
Adrian L. Carper
Caleb J. Wilson
Caleb J. Wilson
Virginia L. Scott
Jason Gibbs
Geographic Biases in Bee Research Limits Understanding of Species Distribution and Response to Anthropogenic Disturbance
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
bee decline
land-use change
pollinator conservation
global change
bee communities
author_facet Mary A. Jamieson
Adrian L. Carper
Caleb J. Wilson
Caleb J. Wilson
Virginia L. Scott
Jason Gibbs
author_sort Mary A. Jamieson
title Geographic Biases in Bee Research Limits Understanding of Species Distribution and Response to Anthropogenic Disturbance
title_short Geographic Biases in Bee Research Limits Understanding of Species Distribution and Response to Anthropogenic Disturbance
title_full Geographic Biases in Bee Research Limits Understanding of Species Distribution and Response to Anthropogenic Disturbance
title_fullStr Geographic Biases in Bee Research Limits Understanding of Species Distribution and Response to Anthropogenic Disturbance
title_full_unstemmed Geographic Biases in Bee Research Limits Understanding of Species Distribution and Response to Anthropogenic Disturbance
title_sort geographic biases in bee research limits understanding of species distribution and response to anthropogenic disturbance
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
issn 2296-701X
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Habitat loss and degradation due to agricultural intensification and urbanization are key threats facing wild pollinators, especially bees. However, data on the distribution and abundance of most of the world's 20,000+ bee species is lacking, making it difficult to assess the effects of anthropogenic disturbance through time. Moreover, there are geographic biases in the study of bees creating gaps in our understanding of species distributions and regional patterns of diversity. Research efforts are often focused around cities or field stations associated with universities and other research institutions. In this perspectives paper, we provide examples of geographic bias in knowledge regarding bee species distributions using recently collected data from Michigan and Colorado, USA—two states with published species checklists. We illustrate how a limited sampling effort can advance knowledge about bee species distributions, yielding species occurrence records at local and regional scales. Given the implications of geographic biases, we recommend future research efforts focus on poorly sampled geographic regions, especially those affected by anthropogenic disturbance, in order to expand our understanding of human impacts on wild bee species. Sampling across a broader geographic area will provide critical information for taxonomy and predictive models of bee species distributions and diversity. We encourage researchers to plan future studies with consideration of strategies to avoid oversampling local bee populations, the taxonomic expertise required to identify specimens, and resources necessary to voucher specimens.
topic bee decline
land-use change
pollinator conservation
global change
bee communities
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fevo.2019.00194/full
work_keys_str_mv AT maryajamieson geographicbiasesinbeeresearchlimitsunderstandingofspeciesdistributionandresponsetoanthropogenicdisturbance
AT adrianlcarper geographicbiasesinbeeresearchlimitsunderstandingofspeciesdistributionandresponsetoanthropogenicdisturbance
AT calebjwilson geographicbiasesinbeeresearchlimitsunderstandingofspeciesdistributionandresponsetoanthropogenicdisturbance
AT calebjwilson geographicbiasesinbeeresearchlimitsunderstandingofspeciesdistributionandresponsetoanthropogenicdisturbance
AT virginialscott geographicbiasesinbeeresearchlimitsunderstandingofspeciesdistributionandresponsetoanthropogenicdisturbance
AT jasongibbs geographicbiasesinbeeresearchlimitsunderstandingofspeciesdistributionandresponsetoanthropogenicdisturbance
_version_ 1725911508454473728