One versus two anterior miniscrews for correcting upper incisor overbite and angulation: a retrospective comparative study

Abstract Background Miniscrews are effective devices for performing upper incisor intrusion. Different mechanics can be applied depending on the treatment objectives. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of one or two anterior miniscrews for upper incisor correction in cases of overbite and ang...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arturo Vela-Hernández, Laura Gutiérrez-Zubeldia, Rocío López-García, Verónica García-Sanz, Vanessa Paredes-Gallardo, José Luis Gandía-Franco, Felicidad Lasagabaster-Latorre
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2020-09-01
Series:Progress in Orthodontics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40510-020-00336-2
id doaj-33c3352cffad43929b52274bff96ed78
record_format Article
spelling doaj-33c3352cffad43929b52274bff96ed782020-11-25T03:36:01ZengSpringerOpenProgress in Orthodontics2196-10422020-09-0121111010.1186/s40510-020-00336-2One versus two anterior miniscrews for correcting upper incisor overbite and angulation: a retrospective comparative studyArturo Vela-Hernández0Laura Gutiérrez-Zubeldia1Rocío López-García2Verónica García-Sanz3Vanessa Paredes-Gallardo4José Luis Gandía-Franco5Felicidad Lasagabaster-Latorre6Orthodontics Teaching Unit, Department of Stomatology, University of ValenciaIn private practiceIn private practiceOrthodontics Teaching Unit, Department of Stomatology, University of ValenciaOrthodontics Teaching Unit, Department of Stomatology, University of ValenciaOrthodontics Teaching Unit, Department of Stomatology, University of ValenciaIn private practiceAbstract Background Miniscrews are effective devices for performing upper incisor intrusion. Different mechanics can be applied depending on the treatment objectives. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of one or two anterior miniscrews for upper incisor correction in cases of overbite and angulation in adult patients. Methods Forty-four adults with deep overbite were divided into two groups: group 1 was treated with one miniscrew between upper central incisors and group 2 with two miniscrews between upper lateral incisors and canines. Incisor intrusion and length were measured from lateral cephalograms before treatment, after treatment and at least 12 months into retention (T0, T1 and T2). Forces were applied (90 g) from the miniscrews to the archwire using elastomeric chains. ANOVA analysis was used to determine whether differences between evaluation times were statistically significant. Results Mean root resorption was 2.15 ± 0.85 mm, which ceased after active treatment. Overbite mean correction was − 3.23 ± 1.73 mm with no statistically significant relapse. Overbite correction and incisor intrusion were significantly greater in group 2 (− 3.80 ± 1.43 versus − 2.75 ± 1.63 for OB and 8.19 ± 3.66 versus 5.69 ± 2.66 for intrusion). Resorption and overbite correction were positively related. No counterclockwise rotation of the mandibular plane was observed. Conclusions Overbite correction can be performed by means of upper incisor intrusion without rotation of the mandibular plane. Correction of upper incisor intrusion and overbite is greater in patients treated with two miniscrews. The increase in upper incisor buccal angulation is greater with one miniscrew. Root resorption is positively related to the extent of intrusion. Stability is satisfactory regardless of whether one or two miniscrews are used.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40510-020-00336-2OverbiteIncisor intrusionMiniscrewsResorption
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Arturo Vela-Hernández
Laura Gutiérrez-Zubeldia
Rocío López-García
Verónica García-Sanz
Vanessa Paredes-Gallardo
José Luis Gandía-Franco
Felicidad Lasagabaster-Latorre
spellingShingle Arturo Vela-Hernández
Laura Gutiérrez-Zubeldia
Rocío López-García
Verónica García-Sanz
Vanessa Paredes-Gallardo
José Luis Gandía-Franco
Felicidad Lasagabaster-Latorre
One versus two anterior miniscrews for correcting upper incisor overbite and angulation: a retrospective comparative study
Progress in Orthodontics
Overbite
Incisor intrusion
Miniscrews
Resorption
author_facet Arturo Vela-Hernández
Laura Gutiérrez-Zubeldia
Rocío López-García
Verónica García-Sanz
Vanessa Paredes-Gallardo
José Luis Gandía-Franco
Felicidad Lasagabaster-Latorre
author_sort Arturo Vela-Hernández
title One versus two anterior miniscrews for correcting upper incisor overbite and angulation: a retrospective comparative study
title_short One versus two anterior miniscrews for correcting upper incisor overbite and angulation: a retrospective comparative study
title_full One versus two anterior miniscrews for correcting upper incisor overbite and angulation: a retrospective comparative study
title_fullStr One versus two anterior miniscrews for correcting upper incisor overbite and angulation: a retrospective comparative study
title_full_unstemmed One versus two anterior miniscrews for correcting upper incisor overbite and angulation: a retrospective comparative study
title_sort one versus two anterior miniscrews for correcting upper incisor overbite and angulation: a retrospective comparative study
publisher SpringerOpen
series Progress in Orthodontics
issn 2196-1042
publishDate 2020-09-01
description Abstract Background Miniscrews are effective devices for performing upper incisor intrusion. Different mechanics can be applied depending on the treatment objectives. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of one or two anterior miniscrews for upper incisor correction in cases of overbite and angulation in adult patients. Methods Forty-four adults with deep overbite were divided into two groups: group 1 was treated with one miniscrew between upper central incisors and group 2 with two miniscrews between upper lateral incisors and canines. Incisor intrusion and length were measured from lateral cephalograms before treatment, after treatment and at least 12 months into retention (T0, T1 and T2). Forces were applied (90 g) from the miniscrews to the archwire using elastomeric chains. ANOVA analysis was used to determine whether differences between evaluation times were statistically significant. Results Mean root resorption was 2.15 ± 0.85 mm, which ceased after active treatment. Overbite mean correction was − 3.23 ± 1.73 mm with no statistically significant relapse. Overbite correction and incisor intrusion were significantly greater in group 2 (− 3.80 ± 1.43 versus − 2.75 ± 1.63 for OB and 8.19 ± 3.66 versus 5.69 ± 2.66 for intrusion). Resorption and overbite correction were positively related. No counterclockwise rotation of the mandibular plane was observed. Conclusions Overbite correction can be performed by means of upper incisor intrusion without rotation of the mandibular plane. Correction of upper incisor intrusion and overbite is greater in patients treated with two miniscrews. The increase in upper incisor buccal angulation is greater with one miniscrew. Root resorption is positively related to the extent of intrusion. Stability is satisfactory regardless of whether one or two miniscrews are used.
topic Overbite
Incisor intrusion
Miniscrews
Resorption
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40510-020-00336-2
work_keys_str_mv AT arturovelahernandez oneversustwoanteriorminiscrewsforcorrectingupperincisoroverbiteandangulationaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT lauragutierrezzubeldia oneversustwoanteriorminiscrewsforcorrectingupperincisoroverbiteandangulationaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT rociolopezgarcia oneversustwoanteriorminiscrewsforcorrectingupperincisoroverbiteandangulationaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT veronicagarciasanz oneversustwoanteriorminiscrewsforcorrectingupperincisoroverbiteandangulationaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT vanessaparedesgallardo oneversustwoanteriorminiscrewsforcorrectingupperincisoroverbiteandangulationaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT joseluisgandiafranco oneversustwoanteriorminiscrewsforcorrectingupperincisoroverbiteandangulationaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT felicidadlasagabasterlatorre oneversustwoanteriorminiscrewsforcorrectingupperincisoroverbiteandangulationaretrospectivecomparativestudy
_version_ 1724551849238855680