Combining Theorem Proving and Model Checking in the Safety-Critical Software Development through Translating Event-B to SMV

Model checking and theorem proving are two key vertification techniques in the formal method, but each has its advantages and disadvantages. In this paper, we first try to present the general model transformation rules from Event-B to SMV in order to realize complementary advantages, and then design...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sen Liang, Xiangyu Luo, Zuxi Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2017-01-01
Series:MATEC Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201712804004
id doaj-343c5ac7b7634f4ba304132ef3217570
record_format Article
spelling doaj-343c5ac7b7634f4ba304132ef32175702021-02-02T00:47:32ZengEDP SciencesMATEC Web of Conferences2261-236X2017-01-011280400410.1051/matecconf/201712804004matecconf_eitce2017_04004Combining Theorem Proving and Model Checking in the Safety-Critical Software Development through Translating Event-B to SMVSen LiangXiangyu LuoZuxi ChenModel checking and theorem proving are two key vertification techniques in the formal method, but each has its advantages and disadvantages. In this paper, we first try to present the general model transformation rules from Event-B to SMV in order to realize complementary advantages, and then design the model converter of Event-B to SMV according to the rules. ProB is the only tool to implement Event-B model checking, but it lacks the real-time property verification, while nuXmv is able to verify temporal logic formulas with the real-time property for SMV models. After completing the model transformation, we use ProB and nuXmv to make the verification of LTL and CTL formulas for two equivalent models respectively. Compared to the experimental results, in solving the same problem, nuXmv has more advantages over memory consumption, time efficiency and so on than ProB, especially when the formula to be verified is very complex. Therefore, if complex verifications of system models need to be performed, it is necessary to implement the model transformation between Event-B and SMV by using our translation rules, which is of great significance for the development, design and verification of safety-critical system softwares.https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201712804004
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sen Liang
Xiangyu Luo
Zuxi Chen
spellingShingle Sen Liang
Xiangyu Luo
Zuxi Chen
Combining Theorem Proving and Model Checking in the Safety-Critical Software Development through Translating Event-B to SMV
MATEC Web of Conferences
author_facet Sen Liang
Xiangyu Luo
Zuxi Chen
author_sort Sen Liang
title Combining Theorem Proving and Model Checking in the Safety-Critical Software Development through Translating Event-B to SMV
title_short Combining Theorem Proving and Model Checking in the Safety-Critical Software Development through Translating Event-B to SMV
title_full Combining Theorem Proving and Model Checking in the Safety-Critical Software Development through Translating Event-B to SMV
title_fullStr Combining Theorem Proving and Model Checking in the Safety-Critical Software Development through Translating Event-B to SMV
title_full_unstemmed Combining Theorem Proving and Model Checking in the Safety-Critical Software Development through Translating Event-B to SMV
title_sort combining theorem proving and model checking in the safety-critical software development through translating event-b to smv
publisher EDP Sciences
series MATEC Web of Conferences
issn 2261-236X
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Model checking and theorem proving are two key vertification techniques in the formal method, but each has its advantages and disadvantages. In this paper, we first try to present the general model transformation rules from Event-B to SMV in order to realize complementary advantages, and then design the model converter of Event-B to SMV according to the rules. ProB is the only tool to implement Event-B model checking, but it lacks the real-time property verification, while nuXmv is able to verify temporal logic formulas with the real-time property for SMV models. After completing the model transformation, we use ProB and nuXmv to make the verification of LTL and CTL formulas for two equivalent models respectively. Compared to the experimental results, in solving the same problem, nuXmv has more advantages over memory consumption, time efficiency and so on than ProB, especially when the formula to be verified is very complex. Therefore, if complex verifications of system models need to be performed, it is necessary to implement the model transformation between Event-B and SMV by using our translation rules, which is of great significance for the development, design and verification of safety-critical system softwares.
url https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201712804004
work_keys_str_mv AT senliang combiningtheoremprovingandmodelcheckinginthesafetycriticalsoftwaredevelopmentthroughtranslatingeventbtosmv
AT xiangyuluo combiningtheoremprovingandmodelcheckinginthesafetycriticalsoftwaredevelopmentthroughtranslatingeventbtosmv
AT zuxichen combiningtheoremprovingandmodelcheckinginthesafetycriticalsoftwaredevelopmentthroughtranslatingeventbtosmv
_version_ 1724313030417711104