Sustainability of quantitative and qualitative indicators of sugarcane production under different tillage systems (case study: Khuzestan province of Iran)

Increasing tillage operations and their repetition each year often increases the costs and adverse effects on soil physical properties. Rising fuel costs and high initial investment in the purchase of agricultural machinery and equipment, and the insistence on overuse of machinery in agriculture, ha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hakim Naseri, Mohammad Gholami Parashkoohi, Iraj Ranjbar, Davood Mohammad Zamani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-12-01
Series:Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972720300283
id doaj-358ed7313ebf4f38ae43d67f452c84b8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-358ed7313ebf4f38ae43d67f452c84b82020-12-21T04:48:26ZengElsevierEnvironmental and Sustainability Indicators2665-97272020-12-018100046Sustainability of quantitative and qualitative indicators of sugarcane production under different tillage systems (case study: Khuzestan province of Iran)Hakim Naseri0Mohammad Gholami Parashkoohi1Iraj Ranjbar2Davood Mohammad Zamani3Department of Biosystem Engineering, Takestan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Takestan, IranCorresponding author.; Department of Biosystem Engineering, Takestan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Takestan, IranDepartment of Biosystem Engineering, Takestan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Takestan, IranDepartment of Biosystem Engineering, Takestan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Takestan, IranIncreasing tillage operations and their repetition each year often increases the costs and adverse effects on soil physical properties. Rising fuel costs and high initial investment in the purchase of agricultural machinery and equipment, and the insistence on overuse of machinery in agriculture, have caused widespread concern around the world. Furthermore, traffic and additional operations by agricultural machinery are significant concerns. This study was performed at Hakim Farabi Sugarcane Agro-Industrial Company (HFSAIC) in Khuzestan province of Iran. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of different tillage systems on the quantitative and qualitative indicators of sugarcane production. The experiment was conducted as a completely randomized design (CRD), with four treatments including: 1- first-time subsoiler (D8 bulldozer) ​+ ​second-time subsoiler (D8 bulldozer) (conventional operation) 2- Alpego tillage tool 3- Nardi tillage tool 4- subsoiler for the first time (D8 bulldozer) ​+ ​subsoiler five Sheng. The result of analysis of variance showed non-significant differences in most quantitative and qualitative indicators in tillage systems. Analysis of mean comparison in quantitative and qualitative indicators showed that T2 treatment (Alpego tillage tool) as a minimum tillage system, was a better system among different tillage systems in sugarcane cultivation. Generally, selecting the appropriate tillage system according to the climate conditions of the area and available equipment tools, along with appropriate solutions such as minimum tillage, can be one of the management practices in sugarcane cultivation.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972720300283Agricultural machinerySugarcane farmsSustainabilityTillageYield
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hakim Naseri
Mohammad Gholami Parashkoohi
Iraj Ranjbar
Davood Mohammad Zamani
spellingShingle Hakim Naseri
Mohammad Gholami Parashkoohi
Iraj Ranjbar
Davood Mohammad Zamani
Sustainability of quantitative and qualitative indicators of sugarcane production under different tillage systems (case study: Khuzestan province of Iran)
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Agricultural machinery
Sugarcane farms
Sustainability
Tillage
Yield
author_facet Hakim Naseri
Mohammad Gholami Parashkoohi
Iraj Ranjbar
Davood Mohammad Zamani
author_sort Hakim Naseri
title Sustainability of quantitative and qualitative indicators of sugarcane production under different tillage systems (case study: Khuzestan province of Iran)
title_short Sustainability of quantitative and qualitative indicators of sugarcane production under different tillage systems (case study: Khuzestan province of Iran)
title_full Sustainability of quantitative and qualitative indicators of sugarcane production under different tillage systems (case study: Khuzestan province of Iran)
title_fullStr Sustainability of quantitative and qualitative indicators of sugarcane production under different tillage systems (case study: Khuzestan province of Iran)
title_full_unstemmed Sustainability of quantitative and qualitative indicators of sugarcane production under different tillage systems (case study: Khuzestan province of Iran)
title_sort sustainability of quantitative and qualitative indicators of sugarcane production under different tillage systems (case study: khuzestan province of iran)
publisher Elsevier
series Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
issn 2665-9727
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Increasing tillage operations and their repetition each year often increases the costs and adverse effects on soil physical properties. Rising fuel costs and high initial investment in the purchase of agricultural machinery and equipment, and the insistence on overuse of machinery in agriculture, have caused widespread concern around the world. Furthermore, traffic and additional operations by agricultural machinery are significant concerns. This study was performed at Hakim Farabi Sugarcane Agro-Industrial Company (HFSAIC) in Khuzestan province of Iran. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of different tillage systems on the quantitative and qualitative indicators of sugarcane production. The experiment was conducted as a completely randomized design (CRD), with four treatments including: 1- first-time subsoiler (D8 bulldozer) ​+ ​second-time subsoiler (D8 bulldozer) (conventional operation) 2- Alpego tillage tool 3- Nardi tillage tool 4- subsoiler for the first time (D8 bulldozer) ​+ ​subsoiler five Sheng. The result of analysis of variance showed non-significant differences in most quantitative and qualitative indicators in tillage systems. Analysis of mean comparison in quantitative and qualitative indicators showed that T2 treatment (Alpego tillage tool) as a minimum tillage system, was a better system among different tillage systems in sugarcane cultivation. Generally, selecting the appropriate tillage system according to the climate conditions of the area and available equipment tools, along with appropriate solutions such as minimum tillage, can be one of the management practices in sugarcane cultivation.
topic Agricultural machinery
Sugarcane farms
Sustainability
Tillage
Yield
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972720300283
work_keys_str_mv AT hakimnaseri sustainabilityofquantitativeandqualitativeindicatorsofsugarcaneproductionunderdifferenttillagesystemscasestudykhuzestanprovinceofiran
AT mohammadgholamiparashkoohi sustainabilityofquantitativeandqualitativeindicatorsofsugarcaneproductionunderdifferenttillagesystemscasestudykhuzestanprovinceofiran
AT irajranjbar sustainabilityofquantitativeandqualitativeindicatorsofsugarcaneproductionunderdifferenttillagesystemscasestudykhuzestanprovinceofiran
AT davoodmohammadzamani sustainabilityofquantitativeandqualitativeindicatorsofsugarcaneproductionunderdifferenttillagesystemscasestudykhuzestanprovinceofiran
_version_ 1724375469312180224