Commentary: Constructing Refugees in the Academic Discourse: The Hmong in America by Marc Dorpema

Produced in a historiographical spirit, this literature review traces trends in the depiction of Hmong Americansnot in popular representations such as newspapers or public perception, but in the American academic discourse itself. By adopting a thematic approach, it evidences the curious...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marc Dorpema
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hmong Studies Journal 2019-12-01
Series:Hmong Studies Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.hmongstudiesjournal.org/uploads/4/5/8/7/4587788/dorpemahsj20.pdf
id doaj-3740b901ae7c48dab7191c6ccb4fdaf5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3740b901ae7c48dab7191c6ccb4fdaf52020-11-25T02:45:40ZengHmong Studies JournalHmong Studies Journal1091-17741091-17742019-12-01201133Commentary: Constructing Refugees in the Academic Discourse: The Hmong in America by Marc DorpemaMarc Dorpema0Department of History, New York UniversityProduced in a historiographical spirit, this literature review traces trends in the depiction of Hmong Americansnot in popular representations such as newspapers or public perception, but in the American academic discourse itself. By adopting a thematic approach, it evidences the curious chronological development of which aspects of Hmong studies were treated in which way from the 1980s until the present. To this extent, the paper argues that while the 1980s and 1990s saw a heavy emphasis on social scientific studies of Hmong family ties and clan structure which, while careful and mostly sensitive in their treatment, nevertheless on occasion construct the Hmong as either irreconcilably or undesirably different(sections I and II). It then proceeds to crystallise the significant treatment of education with respect to the Hmong, which, produced in particular in the late 1990s and early 2000s, presented powerful cases of forced assimilation through the lens of Hmong Americans themselves(section III). A brief fourth section focuses on the marginal role ascribed to economic problems encountered by the Hmong, treated as almost inevitable.Crucially, the fifth section proceeds to problematise more recent feminist critiques.The argument presented here is that their central drawback lies in the appropriation and overriding of Hmong voices for a particular project.This construction of Hmong voices, finally, is on the retreat in most recent studies which, centred on horticulture, music, rituals and medicine –to name but a few –attempt to elucidate the Hmong American experience through the lens of the protagonists themselves. This is an important step, and one which must be pursued further.https://www.hmongstudiesjournal.org/uploads/4/5/8/7/4587788/dorpemahsj20.pdfhmong americanshmong studies
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marc Dorpema
spellingShingle Marc Dorpema
Commentary: Constructing Refugees in the Academic Discourse: The Hmong in America by Marc Dorpema
Hmong Studies Journal
hmong americans
hmong studies
author_facet Marc Dorpema
author_sort Marc Dorpema
title Commentary: Constructing Refugees in the Academic Discourse: The Hmong in America by Marc Dorpema
title_short Commentary: Constructing Refugees in the Academic Discourse: The Hmong in America by Marc Dorpema
title_full Commentary: Constructing Refugees in the Academic Discourse: The Hmong in America by Marc Dorpema
title_fullStr Commentary: Constructing Refugees in the Academic Discourse: The Hmong in America by Marc Dorpema
title_full_unstemmed Commentary: Constructing Refugees in the Academic Discourse: The Hmong in America by Marc Dorpema
title_sort commentary: constructing refugees in the academic discourse: the hmong in america by marc dorpema
publisher Hmong Studies Journal
series Hmong Studies Journal
issn 1091-1774
1091-1774
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Produced in a historiographical spirit, this literature review traces trends in the depiction of Hmong Americansnot in popular representations such as newspapers or public perception, but in the American academic discourse itself. By adopting a thematic approach, it evidences the curious chronological development of which aspects of Hmong studies were treated in which way from the 1980s until the present. To this extent, the paper argues that while the 1980s and 1990s saw a heavy emphasis on social scientific studies of Hmong family ties and clan structure which, while careful and mostly sensitive in their treatment, nevertheless on occasion construct the Hmong as either irreconcilably or undesirably different(sections I and II). It then proceeds to crystallise the significant treatment of education with respect to the Hmong, which, produced in particular in the late 1990s and early 2000s, presented powerful cases of forced assimilation through the lens of Hmong Americans themselves(section III). A brief fourth section focuses on the marginal role ascribed to economic problems encountered by the Hmong, treated as almost inevitable.Crucially, the fifth section proceeds to problematise more recent feminist critiques.The argument presented here is that their central drawback lies in the appropriation and overriding of Hmong voices for a particular project.This construction of Hmong voices, finally, is on the retreat in most recent studies which, centred on horticulture, music, rituals and medicine –to name but a few –attempt to elucidate the Hmong American experience through the lens of the protagonists themselves. This is an important step, and one which must be pursued further.
topic hmong americans
hmong studies
url https://www.hmongstudiesjournal.org/uploads/4/5/8/7/4587788/dorpemahsj20.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT marcdorpema commentaryconstructingrefugeesintheacademicdiscoursethehmonginamericabymarcdorpema
_version_ 1724761164984877056