Landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning algorithms and comparison of their performance at Abha Basin, Asir Region, Saudi Arabia

The current study aimed at evaluating the capabilities of seven advanced machine learning techniques (MLTs), including, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline (MARS), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA), Linear Dis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmed Mohamed Youssef, Hamid Reza Pourghasemi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-03-01
Series:Geoscience Frontiers
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987120301298
id doaj-3a3b1711973040f5860a5b470e1bcf29
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3a3b1711973040f5860a5b470e1bcf292021-01-26T04:12:05ZengElsevierGeoscience Frontiers1674-98712021-03-01122639655Landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning algorithms and comparison of their performance at Abha Basin, Asir Region, Saudi ArabiaAhmed Mohamed Youssef0Hamid Reza Pourghasemi1Geology Department, Faculty of Science, Sohag University, Egypt; Geological Hazards Department, Applied Geology Sector, Saudi Geological Survey, P.O. Box 54141, Jeddah, 21514, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Natural Resources and Environmental Engineering, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran; Corresponding author.The current study aimed at evaluating the capabilities of seven advanced machine learning techniques (MLTs), including, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline (MARS), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), and Naive Bayes (NB), for landslide susceptibility modeling and comparison of their performances. Coupling machine learning algorithms with spatial data types for landslide susceptibility mapping is a vitally important issue. This study was carried out using GIS and R open source software at Abha Basin, Asir Region, Saudi Arabia. First, a total of 243 landslide locations were identified at Abha Basin to prepare the landslide inventory map using different data sources. All the landslide areas were randomly separated into two groups with a ratio of 70% for training and 30% for validating purposes. Twelve landslide-variables were generated for landslide susceptibility modeling, which include altitude, lithology, distance to faults, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), landuse/landcover (LULC), distance to roads, slope angle, distance to streams, profile curvature, plan curvature, slope length (LS), and slope-aspect. The area under curve (AUC-ROC) approach has been applied to evaluate, validate, and compare the MLTs performance. The results indicated that AUC values for seven MLTs range from 89.0% for QDA to 95.1% for RF. Our findings showed that the RF (AUC ​= ​95.1%) and LDA (AUC ​= ​941.7%) have produced the best performances in comparison to other MLTs. The outcome of this study and the landslide susceptibility maps would be useful for environmental protection.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987120301298Landslide susceptibilityMachine learning algorithmsVariables importanceSaudi Arabia
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ahmed Mohamed Youssef
Hamid Reza Pourghasemi
spellingShingle Ahmed Mohamed Youssef
Hamid Reza Pourghasemi
Landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning algorithms and comparison of their performance at Abha Basin, Asir Region, Saudi Arabia
Geoscience Frontiers
Landslide susceptibility
Machine learning algorithms
Variables importance
Saudi Arabia
author_facet Ahmed Mohamed Youssef
Hamid Reza Pourghasemi
author_sort Ahmed Mohamed Youssef
title Landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning algorithms and comparison of their performance at Abha Basin, Asir Region, Saudi Arabia
title_short Landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning algorithms and comparison of their performance at Abha Basin, Asir Region, Saudi Arabia
title_full Landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning algorithms and comparison of their performance at Abha Basin, Asir Region, Saudi Arabia
title_fullStr Landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning algorithms and comparison of their performance at Abha Basin, Asir Region, Saudi Arabia
title_full_unstemmed Landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning algorithms and comparison of their performance at Abha Basin, Asir Region, Saudi Arabia
title_sort landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning algorithms and comparison of their performance at abha basin, asir region, saudi arabia
publisher Elsevier
series Geoscience Frontiers
issn 1674-9871
publishDate 2021-03-01
description The current study aimed at evaluating the capabilities of seven advanced machine learning techniques (MLTs), including, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline (MARS), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), and Naive Bayes (NB), for landslide susceptibility modeling and comparison of their performances. Coupling machine learning algorithms with spatial data types for landslide susceptibility mapping is a vitally important issue. This study was carried out using GIS and R open source software at Abha Basin, Asir Region, Saudi Arabia. First, a total of 243 landslide locations were identified at Abha Basin to prepare the landslide inventory map using different data sources. All the landslide areas were randomly separated into two groups with a ratio of 70% for training and 30% for validating purposes. Twelve landslide-variables were generated for landslide susceptibility modeling, which include altitude, lithology, distance to faults, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), landuse/landcover (LULC), distance to roads, slope angle, distance to streams, profile curvature, plan curvature, slope length (LS), and slope-aspect. The area under curve (AUC-ROC) approach has been applied to evaluate, validate, and compare the MLTs performance. The results indicated that AUC values for seven MLTs range from 89.0% for QDA to 95.1% for RF. Our findings showed that the RF (AUC ​= ​95.1%) and LDA (AUC ​= ​941.7%) have produced the best performances in comparison to other MLTs. The outcome of this study and the landslide susceptibility maps would be useful for environmental protection.
topic Landslide susceptibility
Machine learning algorithms
Variables importance
Saudi Arabia
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987120301298
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedmohamedyoussef landslidesusceptibilitymappingusingmachinelearningalgorithmsandcomparisonoftheirperformanceatabhabasinasirregionsaudiarabia
AT hamidrezapourghasemi landslidesusceptibilitymappingusingmachinelearningalgorithmsandcomparisonoftheirperformanceatabhabasinasirregionsaudiarabia
_version_ 1724323438573649920