A randomised on-line survey exploring how health condition labels affect behavioural intentions.

<h4>Objectives</h4>We examined the effect of 'labels' versus 'descriptions' across four asymptomatic health conditions: pre-diabetes, pre-hypertension, mild hyperlipidaemia, and chronic kidney disease stage 3A, on participants' intentions to pursue further tests....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rae Thomas, Mark T Spence, Rajat Roy, Elaine Beller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240985
id doaj-3cb64e9c9f9c4a9f8807b868c13edf7f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3cb64e9c9f9c4a9f8807b868c13edf7f2021-03-04T11:53:08ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-011510e024098510.1371/journal.pone.0240985A randomised on-line survey exploring how health condition labels affect behavioural intentions.Rae ThomasMark T SpenceRajat RoyElaine Beller<h4>Objectives</h4>We examined the effect of 'labels' versus 'descriptions' across four asymptomatic health conditions: pre-diabetes, pre-hypertension, mild hyperlipidaemia, and chronic kidney disease stage 3A, on participants' intentions to pursue further tests. There were four secondary objectives: 1) assessing confidence and satisfaction in their intention to test further; 2) revealing psychological drivers affecting intentions; 3) exploring whether intentions, confidence and satisfaction differ by label vs. description and health condition; and 4) producing a perceptual map of illnesses by label condition.<h4>Methods</h4>Practitioner validated health-related scenarios were used. Two variants of each condition were developed. Participants were recruited through Qualtrics from Australia, Ireland and Canada and randomly assigned two 'labelled' or two 'descriptive' scenarios.<h4>Results</h4>There was no significant difference in intentions to test between label and description conditions (95% CI -0.76 to 0.33 points, p = 0.4). Confidence and satisfaction were both positively associated with intentions: regression coefficient (β) for confidence β = 0.58 points (95% CI 0.49 to 0.68, p < .001) and for satisfaction 0.67 points (95% CI 0.57 to 0.77, p < .001). Predisposition to seek healthcare (β = 0.72; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.98), attributing illness to bad luck (β = -0.16 points; 95% CI -0.3 to -0.02), and concern about the health condition (β = 0.51; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.65) also significantly predicted intentions.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Unlike studies investigating symptomatic illnesses, the disease label effect on behavioural intentions was not supported suggesting that reducing demand for medical services for borderline cases cannot be achieved by labelling. The average intention to test score was higher in this sample than previous symptomatic health-related studies and there was a positive relationship between increased intentions and confidence/satisfaction in one's decision. Exploratory insights suggested perceptions of the four labelled asymptomatic illnesses all shifted toward greater levels of dread and concern compared to their respective description condition.<h4>Trial registration</h4>ACTRN12618000392268.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240985
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rae Thomas
Mark T Spence
Rajat Roy
Elaine Beller
spellingShingle Rae Thomas
Mark T Spence
Rajat Roy
Elaine Beller
A randomised on-line survey exploring how health condition labels affect behavioural intentions.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Rae Thomas
Mark T Spence
Rajat Roy
Elaine Beller
author_sort Rae Thomas
title A randomised on-line survey exploring how health condition labels affect behavioural intentions.
title_short A randomised on-line survey exploring how health condition labels affect behavioural intentions.
title_full A randomised on-line survey exploring how health condition labels affect behavioural intentions.
title_fullStr A randomised on-line survey exploring how health condition labels affect behavioural intentions.
title_full_unstemmed A randomised on-line survey exploring how health condition labels affect behavioural intentions.
title_sort randomised on-line survey exploring how health condition labels affect behavioural intentions.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description <h4>Objectives</h4>We examined the effect of 'labels' versus 'descriptions' across four asymptomatic health conditions: pre-diabetes, pre-hypertension, mild hyperlipidaemia, and chronic kidney disease stage 3A, on participants' intentions to pursue further tests. There were four secondary objectives: 1) assessing confidence and satisfaction in their intention to test further; 2) revealing psychological drivers affecting intentions; 3) exploring whether intentions, confidence and satisfaction differ by label vs. description and health condition; and 4) producing a perceptual map of illnesses by label condition.<h4>Methods</h4>Practitioner validated health-related scenarios were used. Two variants of each condition were developed. Participants were recruited through Qualtrics from Australia, Ireland and Canada and randomly assigned two 'labelled' or two 'descriptive' scenarios.<h4>Results</h4>There was no significant difference in intentions to test between label and description conditions (95% CI -0.76 to 0.33 points, p = 0.4). Confidence and satisfaction were both positively associated with intentions: regression coefficient (β) for confidence β = 0.58 points (95% CI 0.49 to 0.68, p < .001) and for satisfaction 0.67 points (95% CI 0.57 to 0.77, p < .001). Predisposition to seek healthcare (β = 0.72; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.98), attributing illness to bad luck (β = -0.16 points; 95% CI -0.3 to -0.02), and concern about the health condition (β = 0.51; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.65) also significantly predicted intentions.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Unlike studies investigating symptomatic illnesses, the disease label effect on behavioural intentions was not supported suggesting that reducing demand for medical services for borderline cases cannot be achieved by labelling. The average intention to test score was higher in this sample than previous symptomatic health-related studies and there was a positive relationship between increased intentions and confidence/satisfaction in one's decision. Exploratory insights suggested perceptions of the four labelled asymptomatic illnesses all shifted toward greater levels of dread and concern compared to their respective description condition.<h4>Trial registration</h4>ACTRN12618000392268.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240985
work_keys_str_mv AT raethomas arandomisedonlinesurveyexploringhowhealthconditionlabelsaffectbehaviouralintentions
AT marktspence arandomisedonlinesurveyexploringhowhealthconditionlabelsaffectbehaviouralintentions
AT rajatroy arandomisedonlinesurveyexploringhowhealthconditionlabelsaffectbehaviouralintentions
AT elainebeller arandomisedonlinesurveyexploringhowhealthconditionlabelsaffectbehaviouralintentions
AT raethomas randomisedonlinesurveyexploringhowhealthconditionlabelsaffectbehaviouralintentions
AT marktspence randomisedonlinesurveyexploringhowhealthconditionlabelsaffectbehaviouralintentions
AT rajatroy randomisedonlinesurveyexploringhowhealthconditionlabelsaffectbehaviouralintentions
AT elainebeller randomisedonlinesurveyexploringhowhealthconditionlabelsaffectbehaviouralintentions
_version_ 1714803303045398528