Performance and N2O Formation of the Deammonification Process by Suspended Sludge and Biofilm Systems—A Pilot-Scale Study

A two-stage deammonification pilot plant with two different second-stage reactors, namely a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) with suspended sludge and a moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) with biofilm carriers, was investigated over a 1.5-year period to compare reactor performances. Additionally, disso...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carmen Leix, Rebecca Hartl, Christian Zeh, Franz Beer, Jörg E. Drewes, Konrad Koch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-12-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/8/12/578
id doaj-3f471fa087524692979ad024f2512dfd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3f471fa087524692979ad024f2512dfd2020-11-24T22:49:08ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412016-12-0181257810.3390/w8120578w8120578Performance and N2O Formation of the Deammonification Process by Suspended Sludge and Biofilm Systems—A Pilot-Scale StudyCarmen Leix0Rebecca Hartl1Christian Zeh2Franz Beer3Jörg E. Drewes4Konrad Koch5Chair of Urban Water Systems Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Am Coulombwall 3, 85748 Garching, GermanyChair of Urban Water Systems Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Am Coulombwall 3, 85748 Garching, GermanyAbwasserverband Kempten (Allgäu), Griesösch 1, 87493 Lauben, GermanyAbwasserverband Kempten (Allgäu), Griesösch 1, 87493 Lauben, GermanyChair of Urban Water Systems Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Am Coulombwall 3, 85748 Garching, GermanyChair of Urban Water Systems Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Am Coulombwall 3, 85748 Garching, GermanyA two-stage deammonification pilot plant with two different second-stage reactors, namely a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) with suspended sludge and a moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) with biofilm carriers, was investigated over a 1.5-year period to compare reactor performances. Additionally, dissolved nitrous oxide (N2O) was measured to determine the reactors’ N2O formation potential. Although the nitritation performance was moderate (NO2-N/NH4-N effluent ratio of 0.32 ± 0.15 in combination with SBR and 0.25 ± 0.14 with MBBR), nitrogen turnover and degradation rates exceeding 500 g N/(m3∙day) and 80%, respectively, were achieved in both second stages, yet requiring additional aeration. The SBR’s average nitrogen removal was 19% higher than the MBBR’s; however, the SBR’s nitrite influent concentration was comparably elevated. Concerning N2O formation, the nitritation reactor exhibited the lowest N2O concentrations, while the buffer tank, interconnecting the first and second stages, exhibited the highest N2O concentrations of all reactors. Given these high concentrations, a transfer of N2O into the second stage was observed, where anoxic phases enabled N2O reduction. Frequent biomass removal and a decreased hydraulic retention time in the buffer tank would likely minimize N2O formation. For the second stage, enabling anoxic periods in the intermittent aeration cycles right after feeding to support N2O reduction and thus minimize the stripping effects or the implementation of a complete anoxic ammonium oxidation will mitigate N2O emissions.http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/8/12/578anammoxdairy industryemissionsgreenhouse gasesMBBRnitritationnitrogen removalnitrous oxidetwo-stage deammonification
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carmen Leix
Rebecca Hartl
Christian Zeh
Franz Beer
Jörg E. Drewes
Konrad Koch
spellingShingle Carmen Leix
Rebecca Hartl
Christian Zeh
Franz Beer
Jörg E. Drewes
Konrad Koch
Performance and N2O Formation of the Deammonification Process by Suspended Sludge and Biofilm Systems—A Pilot-Scale Study
Water
anammox
dairy industry
emissions
greenhouse gases
MBBR
nitritation
nitrogen removal
nitrous oxide
two-stage deammonification
author_facet Carmen Leix
Rebecca Hartl
Christian Zeh
Franz Beer
Jörg E. Drewes
Konrad Koch
author_sort Carmen Leix
title Performance and N2O Formation of the Deammonification Process by Suspended Sludge and Biofilm Systems—A Pilot-Scale Study
title_short Performance and N2O Formation of the Deammonification Process by Suspended Sludge and Biofilm Systems—A Pilot-Scale Study
title_full Performance and N2O Formation of the Deammonification Process by Suspended Sludge and Biofilm Systems—A Pilot-Scale Study
title_fullStr Performance and N2O Formation of the Deammonification Process by Suspended Sludge and Biofilm Systems—A Pilot-Scale Study
title_full_unstemmed Performance and N2O Formation of the Deammonification Process by Suspended Sludge and Biofilm Systems—A Pilot-Scale Study
title_sort performance and n2o formation of the deammonification process by suspended sludge and biofilm systems—a pilot-scale study
publisher MDPI AG
series Water
issn 2073-4441
publishDate 2016-12-01
description A two-stage deammonification pilot plant with two different second-stage reactors, namely a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) with suspended sludge and a moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) with biofilm carriers, was investigated over a 1.5-year period to compare reactor performances. Additionally, dissolved nitrous oxide (N2O) was measured to determine the reactors’ N2O formation potential. Although the nitritation performance was moderate (NO2-N/NH4-N effluent ratio of 0.32 ± 0.15 in combination with SBR and 0.25 ± 0.14 with MBBR), nitrogen turnover and degradation rates exceeding 500 g N/(m3∙day) and 80%, respectively, were achieved in both second stages, yet requiring additional aeration. The SBR’s average nitrogen removal was 19% higher than the MBBR’s; however, the SBR’s nitrite influent concentration was comparably elevated. Concerning N2O formation, the nitritation reactor exhibited the lowest N2O concentrations, while the buffer tank, interconnecting the first and second stages, exhibited the highest N2O concentrations of all reactors. Given these high concentrations, a transfer of N2O into the second stage was observed, where anoxic phases enabled N2O reduction. Frequent biomass removal and a decreased hydraulic retention time in the buffer tank would likely minimize N2O formation. For the second stage, enabling anoxic periods in the intermittent aeration cycles right after feeding to support N2O reduction and thus minimize the stripping effects or the implementation of a complete anoxic ammonium oxidation will mitigate N2O emissions.
topic anammox
dairy industry
emissions
greenhouse gases
MBBR
nitritation
nitrogen removal
nitrous oxide
two-stage deammonification
url http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/8/12/578
work_keys_str_mv AT carmenleix performanceandn2oformationofthedeammonificationprocessbysuspendedsludgeandbiofilmsystemsapilotscalestudy
AT rebeccahartl performanceandn2oformationofthedeammonificationprocessbysuspendedsludgeandbiofilmsystemsapilotscalestudy
AT christianzeh performanceandn2oformationofthedeammonificationprocessbysuspendedsludgeandbiofilmsystemsapilotscalestudy
AT franzbeer performanceandn2oformationofthedeammonificationprocessbysuspendedsludgeandbiofilmsystemsapilotscalestudy
AT jorgedrewes performanceandn2oformationofthedeammonificationprocessbysuspendedsludgeandbiofilmsystemsapilotscalestudy
AT konradkoch performanceandn2oformationofthedeammonificationprocessbysuspendedsludgeandbiofilmsystemsapilotscalestudy
_version_ 1725677130956668928