Individuals’ explanations for their persistent or recurrent low back pain: a cross-sectional survey
Abstract Background Most people experience low back pain (LBP), and it is often ongoing or recurrent. Contemporary research knowledge indicates individual’s pain beliefs have a strong effect on their pain experience and management. This study’s primary aim was to determine the discourses (patterns o...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-11-01
|
Series: | BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-017-1831-7 |
id |
doaj-3fc0a61792c74319b17ec249741f1948 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3fc0a61792c74319b17ec249741f19482020-11-25T00:32:58ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742017-11-011811910.1186/s12891-017-1831-7Individuals’ explanations for their persistent or recurrent low back pain: a cross-sectional surveyJenny Setchell0Nathalia Costa1Manuela Ferreira2Joanna Makovey3Mandy Nielsen4Paul W. Hodges5School of Health and Rehabilitation SciencesSchool of Health and Rehabilitation SciencesInstitute of Bone and Joint Research/The Kolling Institute, Sydney Medical School, The University of SydneyInstitute of Bone and Joint Research/The Kolling Institute, Sydney Medical School, The University of SydneySchool of Health and Rehabilitation SciencesSchool of Health and Rehabilitation SciencesAbstract Background Most people experience low back pain (LBP), and it is often ongoing or recurrent. Contemporary research knowledge indicates individual’s pain beliefs have a strong effect on their pain experience and management. This study’s primary aim was to determine the discourses (patterns of thinking) underlying people’s beliefs about what causes their LBP to persist. The secondary aim was to investigate what they believed was the source of this thinking. Methods We used a primarily qualitative survey design: 130 participants answered questions about what caused their LBP to persist, and where they learned about these causes. We analysed responses about what caused their LBP using discourse analysis (primary aim), and mixed methods involving content analysis and descriptive statistics to analyse responses indicating where participants learnt these beliefs (secondary aim). Results We found that individuals discussed persistent LBP as 1) due to the body being like a ‘broken machine’, 2) permanent/immutable, 3) complex, and 4) very negative. Most participants indicated that they learnt these beliefs from health professionals (116, 89%). Conclusions We concluded that despite continuing attempts to shift pain beliefs to more complex biopsychosocial factors, most people with LBP adhere to the traditional biomedical perspective of anatomical/biomechanical causes. Relatedly, they often see their condition as very negative. Contrary to current “best practice” guidelines for LBP management, a potential consequence of such beliefs is an avoidance of physical activities, which is likely to result in increased morbidity. That health professionals may be the most pervasive source of this thinking is a cause for concern. A small number of people attributed non-physical, unknown or complex causes to their persistent LBP – indicating that other options are possible.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-017-1831-7Pain trajectoriesDiscourse analysisLumbarPatient perspectivesPsychosocial |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jenny Setchell Nathalia Costa Manuela Ferreira Joanna Makovey Mandy Nielsen Paul W. Hodges |
spellingShingle |
Jenny Setchell Nathalia Costa Manuela Ferreira Joanna Makovey Mandy Nielsen Paul W. Hodges Individuals’ explanations for their persistent or recurrent low back pain: a cross-sectional survey BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Pain trajectories Discourse analysis Lumbar Patient perspectives Psychosocial |
author_facet |
Jenny Setchell Nathalia Costa Manuela Ferreira Joanna Makovey Mandy Nielsen Paul W. Hodges |
author_sort |
Jenny Setchell |
title |
Individuals’ explanations for their persistent or recurrent low back pain: a cross-sectional survey |
title_short |
Individuals’ explanations for their persistent or recurrent low back pain: a cross-sectional survey |
title_full |
Individuals’ explanations for their persistent or recurrent low back pain: a cross-sectional survey |
title_fullStr |
Individuals’ explanations for their persistent or recurrent low back pain: a cross-sectional survey |
title_full_unstemmed |
Individuals’ explanations for their persistent or recurrent low back pain: a cross-sectional survey |
title_sort |
individuals’ explanations for their persistent or recurrent low back pain: a cross-sectional survey |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
issn |
1471-2474 |
publishDate |
2017-11-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Most people experience low back pain (LBP), and it is often ongoing or recurrent. Contemporary research knowledge indicates individual’s pain beliefs have a strong effect on their pain experience and management. This study’s primary aim was to determine the discourses (patterns of thinking) underlying people’s beliefs about what causes their LBP to persist. The secondary aim was to investigate what they believed was the source of this thinking. Methods We used a primarily qualitative survey design: 130 participants answered questions about what caused their LBP to persist, and where they learned about these causes. We analysed responses about what caused their LBP using discourse analysis (primary aim), and mixed methods involving content analysis and descriptive statistics to analyse responses indicating where participants learnt these beliefs (secondary aim). Results We found that individuals discussed persistent LBP as 1) due to the body being like a ‘broken machine’, 2) permanent/immutable, 3) complex, and 4) very negative. Most participants indicated that they learnt these beliefs from health professionals (116, 89%). Conclusions We concluded that despite continuing attempts to shift pain beliefs to more complex biopsychosocial factors, most people with LBP adhere to the traditional biomedical perspective of anatomical/biomechanical causes. Relatedly, they often see their condition as very negative. Contrary to current “best practice” guidelines for LBP management, a potential consequence of such beliefs is an avoidance of physical activities, which is likely to result in increased morbidity. That health professionals may be the most pervasive source of this thinking is a cause for concern. A small number of people attributed non-physical, unknown or complex causes to their persistent LBP – indicating that other options are possible. |
topic |
Pain trajectories Discourse analysis Lumbar Patient perspectives Psychosocial |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-017-1831-7 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jennysetchell individualsexplanationsfortheirpersistentorrecurrentlowbackpainacrosssectionalsurvey AT nathaliacosta individualsexplanationsfortheirpersistentorrecurrentlowbackpainacrosssectionalsurvey AT manuelaferreira individualsexplanationsfortheirpersistentorrecurrentlowbackpainacrosssectionalsurvey AT joannamakovey individualsexplanationsfortheirpersistentorrecurrentlowbackpainacrosssectionalsurvey AT mandynielsen individualsexplanationsfortheirpersistentorrecurrentlowbackpainacrosssectionalsurvey AT paulwhodges individualsexplanationsfortheirpersistentorrecurrentlowbackpainacrosssectionalsurvey |
_version_ |
1725317976052203520 |