Impact of cigarette taxes on smoking prevalence from 2001-2015: A report using the Behavioral and Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS).

OBJECTIVES:To provide an up-to-date analysis on the relationship between excise taxes and the prevalence of cigarette smoking in the United States. METHODS:Linear mixed-effects models were used to model the relationship between excise taxes and prevalence of cigarette smoking in each state from 2001...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael S Sharbaugh, Andrew D Althouse, Floyd W Thoma, Joon S Lee, Vincent M Figueredo, Suresh R Mulukutla
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6147505?pdf=render
id doaj-4030c5d585b64f0db708ed98450cd951
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4030c5d585b64f0db708ed98450cd9512020-11-24T21:35:49ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01139e020441610.1371/journal.pone.0204416Impact of cigarette taxes on smoking prevalence from 2001-2015: A report using the Behavioral and Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS).Michael S SharbaughAndrew D AlthouseFloyd W ThomaJoon S LeeVincent M FigueredoSuresh R MulukutlaOBJECTIVES:To provide an up-to-date analysis on the relationship between excise taxes and the prevalence of cigarette smoking in the United States. METHODS:Linear mixed-effects models were used to model the relationship between excise taxes and prevalence of cigarette smoking in each state from 2001 through 2015. RESULTS:From 2001 through 2015, increases in state-level excise taxes were associated with declines in prevalence of cigarette smoking. The effect was strongest in young adults (age 18-24) and weakest in low-income individuals (<$25,000). CONCLUSIONS:Despite the shrinking pool of current smokers, excise taxes remain a valuable tool in public-health efforts to reduce the prevalence of cigarette smoking. POLICY IMPLICATIONS:States with high smoking prevalence may find increased excise taxes an effective measure to reduce population smoking prevalence. Since the effect is greatest in young adults, benefits of increased tax would likely accumulate over time by preventing new smokers in the pivotal young-adult years.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6147505?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michael S Sharbaugh
Andrew D Althouse
Floyd W Thoma
Joon S Lee
Vincent M Figueredo
Suresh R Mulukutla
spellingShingle Michael S Sharbaugh
Andrew D Althouse
Floyd W Thoma
Joon S Lee
Vincent M Figueredo
Suresh R Mulukutla
Impact of cigarette taxes on smoking prevalence from 2001-2015: A report using the Behavioral and Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS).
PLoS ONE
author_facet Michael S Sharbaugh
Andrew D Althouse
Floyd W Thoma
Joon S Lee
Vincent M Figueredo
Suresh R Mulukutla
author_sort Michael S Sharbaugh
title Impact of cigarette taxes on smoking prevalence from 2001-2015: A report using the Behavioral and Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS).
title_short Impact of cigarette taxes on smoking prevalence from 2001-2015: A report using the Behavioral and Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS).
title_full Impact of cigarette taxes on smoking prevalence from 2001-2015: A report using the Behavioral and Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS).
title_fullStr Impact of cigarette taxes on smoking prevalence from 2001-2015: A report using the Behavioral and Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS).
title_full_unstemmed Impact of cigarette taxes on smoking prevalence from 2001-2015: A report using the Behavioral and Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS).
title_sort impact of cigarette taxes on smoking prevalence from 2001-2015: a report using the behavioral and risk factor surveillance survey (brfss).
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description OBJECTIVES:To provide an up-to-date analysis on the relationship between excise taxes and the prevalence of cigarette smoking in the United States. METHODS:Linear mixed-effects models were used to model the relationship between excise taxes and prevalence of cigarette smoking in each state from 2001 through 2015. RESULTS:From 2001 through 2015, increases in state-level excise taxes were associated with declines in prevalence of cigarette smoking. The effect was strongest in young adults (age 18-24) and weakest in low-income individuals (<$25,000). CONCLUSIONS:Despite the shrinking pool of current smokers, excise taxes remain a valuable tool in public-health efforts to reduce the prevalence of cigarette smoking. POLICY IMPLICATIONS:States with high smoking prevalence may find increased excise taxes an effective measure to reduce population smoking prevalence. Since the effect is greatest in young adults, benefits of increased tax would likely accumulate over time by preventing new smokers in the pivotal young-adult years.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6147505?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelssharbaugh impactofcigarettetaxesonsmokingprevalencefrom20012015areportusingthebehavioralandriskfactorsurveillancesurveybrfss
AT andrewdalthouse impactofcigarettetaxesonsmokingprevalencefrom20012015areportusingthebehavioralandriskfactorsurveillancesurveybrfss
AT floydwthoma impactofcigarettetaxesonsmokingprevalencefrom20012015areportusingthebehavioralandriskfactorsurveillancesurveybrfss
AT joonslee impactofcigarettetaxesonsmokingprevalencefrom20012015areportusingthebehavioralandriskfactorsurveillancesurveybrfss
AT vincentmfigueredo impactofcigarettetaxesonsmokingprevalencefrom20012015areportusingthebehavioralandriskfactorsurveillancesurveybrfss
AT sureshrmulukutla impactofcigarettetaxesonsmokingprevalencefrom20012015areportusingthebehavioralandriskfactorsurveillancesurveybrfss
_version_ 1725943781959663616