Context Influences Conscious Appraisal of Cross Situational Statistical Learning

Previous research in cross-situational statistical learning has established that people can track statistical information across streams in order to map nonce words to their referent objects (Yu & Smith, 2007). Under some circumstances, learners are able to acquire multiple mappings for a singl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Timothy J Poepsel, Daniel J Weiss
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00691/full
id doaj-4039ede1dc8f4efe83b03d52501ba3df
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4039ede1dc8f4efe83b03d52501ba3df2020-11-24T22:21:38ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782014-07-01510.3389/fpsyg.2014.0069188133Context Influences Conscious Appraisal of Cross Situational Statistical LearningTimothy J Poepsel0Daniel J Weiss1The Pennsylvania State UniversityThe Pennsylvania State UniversityPrevious research in cross-situational statistical learning has established that people can track statistical information across streams in order to map nonce words to their referent objects (Yu & Smith, 2007). Under some circumstances, learners are able to acquire multiple mappings for a single object (e.g., Yurovsky & Yu, 2008). Here we explore whether having a contextual cue associated with a new mapping may facilitate this process, or the conscious awareness of learning. Using a cross-situational statistical learning paradigm, in which learners could form both 1:1 and 2:1 word-object mappings over two phases of learning, we collected confidence ratings during familiarization and provided a retrospective test to gauge learning. In Condition 1, there were no contextual cues to indicate a change in mappings (baseline). Conditions 2 and 3 added contextual cues (a change in speaker voice or explicit instructions respectively) to the second familiarization phase to determine their effects on the trajectory of learning. While contextual cues did not facilitate acquisition of 2:1 mappings as assessed by retrospective measures, confidence ratings for these mappings were significantly higher in contextual cue conditions compared to the baseline condition with no cues. These results suggest that contextual cues corresponding to changes in the input may influence the conscious awareness of learning.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00691/fullAwarenessword learningstatistical learningmutual exclusivitycross situational statistical learningcontextual cues
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Timothy J Poepsel
Daniel J Weiss
spellingShingle Timothy J Poepsel
Daniel J Weiss
Context Influences Conscious Appraisal of Cross Situational Statistical Learning
Frontiers in Psychology
Awareness
word learning
statistical learning
mutual exclusivity
cross situational statistical learning
contextual cues
author_facet Timothy J Poepsel
Daniel J Weiss
author_sort Timothy J Poepsel
title Context Influences Conscious Appraisal of Cross Situational Statistical Learning
title_short Context Influences Conscious Appraisal of Cross Situational Statistical Learning
title_full Context Influences Conscious Appraisal of Cross Situational Statistical Learning
title_fullStr Context Influences Conscious Appraisal of Cross Situational Statistical Learning
title_full_unstemmed Context Influences Conscious Appraisal of Cross Situational Statistical Learning
title_sort context influences conscious appraisal of cross situational statistical learning
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2014-07-01
description Previous research in cross-situational statistical learning has established that people can track statistical information across streams in order to map nonce words to their referent objects (Yu & Smith, 2007). Under some circumstances, learners are able to acquire multiple mappings for a single object (e.g., Yurovsky & Yu, 2008). Here we explore whether having a contextual cue associated with a new mapping may facilitate this process, or the conscious awareness of learning. Using a cross-situational statistical learning paradigm, in which learners could form both 1:1 and 2:1 word-object mappings over two phases of learning, we collected confidence ratings during familiarization and provided a retrospective test to gauge learning. In Condition 1, there were no contextual cues to indicate a change in mappings (baseline). Conditions 2 and 3 added contextual cues (a change in speaker voice or explicit instructions respectively) to the second familiarization phase to determine their effects on the trajectory of learning. While contextual cues did not facilitate acquisition of 2:1 mappings as assessed by retrospective measures, confidence ratings for these mappings were significantly higher in contextual cue conditions compared to the baseline condition with no cues. These results suggest that contextual cues corresponding to changes in the input may influence the conscious awareness of learning.
topic Awareness
word learning
statistical learning
mutual exclusivity
cross situational statistical learning
contextual cues
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00691/full
work_keys_str_mv AT timothyjpoepsel contextinfluencesconsciousappraisalofcrosssituationalstatisticallearning
AT danieljweiss contextinfluencesconsciousappraisalofcrosssituationalstatisticallearning
_version_ 1725770390127509504