Analysis of Pollination Services Provided by Wild and Managed Bees (Apoidea) in Wild Blueberry (<i>Vaccinium angustifolium</i> Aiton<i>)</i> Production in Maine, USA, with a Literature Review

• Main Authors: Sara L. Bushmann, Francis A. Drummond
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 2020-09-01
• Series: Agronomy
• Subjects: bumble bee; <i>Bombus</i>; honey bee; <i>Apis</i>; wild blueberry; fruit set
• Online Access: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/10/9/1413

Maine is the largest producer of wild blueberry (<i>Vaccinium angustifolium</i> Aiton) in the United States. Pollination comes from combinations of honey bees (<i>Apis</i><i> mellifera </i>(L.)), commercial bumble bees (<i>Bombus impatiens </i>Cresson), and wild bees. This study addresses (1) previous research addressing wild-blueberry pollination, (2) effects of wild-bee and honey-bee activity densities on fruit set, yield, and crop value, (3) the economic value of wild-bee communities, and (4) economic consequences of pollinator loss. Bee communities were sampled in 40 fields over three years (2010–2012) and bee activity densities were estimated for bumble bees, honey bees, and other wild bees. These data were applied to an economic model to estimate the value of bee taxa. Bumble bees and honey bees predicted fruit set and reduced its spatial heterogeneity. Other wild bees were not significant predictors of fruit set. Yield was predicted by fruit set and field size, but not pest management tactics. Our analysis showed that disruption in supply of honey bees would result in nearly a 30% decrease in crop yield, buffered in part by wild bees that provide “background” levels of pollination. Honey-bee stocking density and, thus, the activity density of honey bees was greater in larger fields, but not for wild bees. Therefore, a decrease in crop yield would be greater than 30% for large fields due to the proportionally greater investment in honey bees in large fields and a relatively lower contribution by wild bees.