A New Method for Correcting Verification Bias in Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Using A Bayesian Approach

Background & Objectives: One of the problems of diagnostic accuracy studies is verification bias. It occurs when standard test performed only for non-representative subsample of study subjects that diagnostic test done for them. In this study we extend a Bayesian method to correct this bias. M...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M Cheharazi, M Shamsipour, M Norouzi, F Jafari, F Ramazan Ali
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2012-09-01
Series:مجله اپیدمیولوژی ایران
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irje.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-25-5&slc_lang=en&sid=1
id doaj-44e8ece187444d5faf80838b6aeb7e6e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-44e8ece187444d5faf80838b6aeb7e6e2021-09-02T17:38:29ZfasTehran University of Medical Sciencesمجله اپیدمیولوژی ایران1735-74892228-75072012-09-01822028A New Method for Correcting Verification Bias in Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Using A Bayesian ApproachM Cheharazi0M Shamsipour1M Norouzi2F Jafari3F Ramazan Ali4 Background & Objectives: One of the problems of diagnostic accuracy studies is verification bias. It occurs when standard test performed only for non-representative subsample of study subjects that diagnostic test done for them. In this study we extend a Bayesian method to correct this bias. Methods: Patients that have had at least twice repeated failures in cycles IVF ICSI were included in this model. Patients were screened by using an ultrasonography and those with polyps recommended for hysteroscopy. A logistic regression with binomial outcome fit to predict the missing values (false and true negative), sensitivity and specificity. Bayesian methods was applied with informative prior on polyp prevalence. False and true negatives were estimated in Bayesian framework.Results: A total of 238 patients were screened and 47 had polyps. Those with polyps are strongly recommended to undergo hysteroscopy, 47/47 decided to have a hysteroscopy and 37/47 were confirmed to have polyps. None of the 191 patients with no polyps in ultrasonography had hysteroscopy. The false negative was obtained 14 and true negative 177, so sensitivity and specificity was estimated easily after estimating missing data. Sensitivity and specificity were equal to 74% and 94% respectively.Conclusion: Bayesian analyses with informative prior seem to be powerful tools in simulation experimental http://irje.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-25-5&slc_lang=en&sid=1Verification biasMCMCBayesianHysteroscopyVaginal ultrasonography
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M Cheharazi
M Shamsipour
M Norouzi
F Jafari
F Ramazan Ali
spellingShingle M Cheharazi
M Shamsipour
M Norouzi
F Jafari
F Ramazan Ali
A New Method for Correcting Verification Bias in Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Using A Bayesian Approach
مجله اپیدمیولوژی ایران
Verification bias
MCMC
Bayesian
Hysteroscopy
Vaginal ultrasonography
author_facet M Cheharazi
M Shamsipour
M Norouzi
F Jafari
F Ramazan Ali
author_sort M Cheharazi
title A New Method for Correcting Verification Bias in Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Using A Bayesian Approach
title_short A New Method for Correcting Verification Bias in Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Using A Bayesian Approach
title_full A New Method for Correcting Verification Bias in Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Using A Bayesian Approach
title_fullStr A New Method for Correcting Verification Bias in Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Using A Bayesian Approach
title_full_unstemmed A New Method for Correcting Verification Bias in Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Using A Bayesian Approach
title_sort new method for correcting verification bias in diagnostic accuracy studies using a bayesian approach
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
series مجله اپیدمیولوژی ایران
issn 1735-7489
2228-7507
publishDate 2012-09-01
description Background & Objectives: One of the problems of diagnostic accuracy studies is verification bias. It occurs when standard test performed only for non-representative subsample of study subjects that diagnostic test done for them. In this study we extend a Bayesian method to correct this bias. Methods: Patients that have had at least twice repeated failures in cycles IVF ICSI were included in this model. Patients were screened by using an ultrasonography and those with polyps recommended for hysteroscopy. A logistic regression with binomial outcome fit to predict the missing values (false and true negative), sensitivity and specificity. Bayesian methods was applied with informative prior on polyp prevalence. False and true negatives were estimated in Bayesian framework.Results: A total of 238 patients were screened and 47 had polyps. Those with polyps are strongly recommended to undergo hysteroscopy, 47/47 decided to have a hysteroscopy and 37/47 were confirmed to have polyps. None of the 191 patients with no polyps in ultrasonography had hysteroscopy. The false negative was obtained 14 and true negative 177, so sensitivity and specificity was estimated easily after estimating missing data. Sensitivity and specificity were equal to 74% and 94% respectively.Conclusion: Bayesian analyses with informative prior seem to be powerful tools in simulation experimental
topic Verification bias
MCMC
Bayesian
Hysteroscopy
Vaginal ultrasonography
url http://irje.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-25-5&slc_lang=en&sid=1
work_keys_str_mv AT mcheharazi anewmethodforcorrectingverificationbiasindiagnosticaccuracystudiesusingabayesianapproach
AT mshamsipour anewmethodforcorrectingverificationbiasindiagnosticaccuracystudiesusingabayesianapproach
AT mnorouzi anewmethodforcorrectingverificationbiasindiagnosticaccuracystudiesusingabayesianapproach
AT fjafari anewmethodforcorrectingverificationbiasindiagnosticaccuracystudiesusingabayesianapproach
AT framazanali anewmethodforcorrectingverificationbiasindiagnosticaccuracystudiesusingabayesianapproach
AT mcheharazi newmethodforcorrectingverificationbiasindiagnosticaccuracystudiesusingabayesianapproach
AT mshamsipour newmethodforcorrectingverificationbiasindiagnosticaccuracystudiesusingabayesianapproach
AT mnorouzi newmethodforcorrectingverificationbiasindiagnosticaccuracystudiesusingabayesianapproach
AT fjafari newmethodforcorrectingverificationbiasindiagnosticaccuracystudiesusingabayesianapproach
AT framazanali newmethodforcorrectingverificationbiasindiagnosticaccuracystudiesusingabayesianapproach
_version_ 1721172051576750080