Development of the mHealth App Trustworthiness checklist

Background Mobile health applications (mHealth apps) currently lack a consensus on substantial quality and safety standards. As such, the number of individuals engaging with untrustworthy mHealth apps continues to grow at a steady pace. Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate end-user...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Afua van Haasteren, Felix Gille, Marta Fadda, Effy Vayena
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-11-01
Series:Digital Health
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207619886463
id doaj-4903aab370264e4984689f5c4393aef0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4903aab370264e4984689f5c4393aef02020-11-25T03:36:02ZengSAGE PublishingDigital Health2055-20762019-11-01510.1177/2055207619886463Development of the mHealth App Trustworthiness checklistAfua van HaasterenFelix GilleMarta FaddaEffy VayenaBackground Mobile health applications (mHealth apps) currently lack a consensus on substantial quality and safety standards. As such, the number of individuals engaging with untrustworthy mHealth apps continues to grow at a steady pace. Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate end-users’ opinions on the features or actions necessary for trustworthy mHealth apps; and to convey this information to app developers via a succinct but informative checklist: the mHealth app trustworthiness checklist. Methods The checklist was formulated in three stages: (a) a literature review of studies identified the desirable features of the most prolific mHealth apps (health and fitness apps); (b) four focus group sessions with past or current users of these apps ( n  = 20); and (c) expert feedback on whether the checklist items are conceivable in a real-life setting ( n  = 6). Results Five major themes emerged from the focus group discussions: informational content, organizational attributes, societal influence, technology-related features, and user control factors. The mHealth app trustworthiness checklist was developed to incorporate these five themes and subsequently modified following expert consultation. In addition to the trustworthiness themes, we identified features that lie between trust and mistrust (limited digital literacy and indifference) as well as 10 features and actions that cause end-users to mistrust mHealth apps. Conclusion This study contributes to the evidence base on the attributes of trustworthy mHealth apps. The mHealth app trustworthiness checklist is a useful tool in advancing continued efforts to ensure that health technologies are trustworthy.https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207619886463
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Afua van Haasteren
Felix Gille
Marta Fadda
Effy Vayena
spellingShingle Afua van Haasteren
Felix Gille
Marta Fadda
Effy Vayena
Development of the mHealth App Trustworthiness checklist
Digital Health
author_facet Afua van Haasteren
Felix Gille
Marta Fadda
Effy Vayena
author_sort Afua van Haasteren
title Development of the mHealth App Trustworthiness checklist
title_short Development of the mHealth App Trustworthiness checklist
title_full Development of the mHealth App Trustworthiness checklist
title_fullStr Development of the mHealth App Trustworthiness checklist
title_full_unstemmed Development of the mHealth App Trustworthiness checklist
title_sort development of the mhealth app trustworthiness checklist
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Digital Health
issn 2055-2076
publishDate 2019-11-01
description Background Mobile health applications (mHealth apps) currently lack a consensus on substantial quality and safety standards. As such, the number of individuals engaging with untrustworthy mHealth apps continues to grow at a steady pace. Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate end-users’ opinions on the features or actions necessary for trustworthy mHealth apps; and to convey this information to app developers via a succinct but informative checklist: the mHealth app trustworthiness checklist. Methods The checklist was formulated in three stages: (a) a literature review of studies identified the desirable features of the most prolific mHealth apps (health and fitness apps); (b) four focus group sessions with past or current users of these apps ( n  = 20); and (c) expert feedback on whether the checklist items are conceivable in a real-life setting ( n  = 6). Results Five major themes emerged from the focus group discussions: informational content, organizational attributes, societal influence, technology-related features, and user control factors. The mHealth app trustworthiness checklist was developed to incorporate these five themes and subsequently modified following expert consultation. In addition to the trustworthiness themes, we identified features that lie between trust and mistrust (limited digital literacy and indifference) as well as 10 features and actions that cause end-users to mistrust mHealth apps. Conclusion This study contributes to the evidence base on the attributes of trustworthy mHealth apps. The mHealth app trustworthiness checklist is a useful tool in advancing continued efforts to ensure that health technologies are trustworthy.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207619886463
work_keys_str_mv AT afuavanhaasteren developmentofthemhealthapptrustworthinesschecklist
AT felixgille developmentofthemhealthapptrustworthinesschecklist
AT martafadda developmentofthemhealthapptrustworthinesschecklist
AT effyvayena developmentofthemhealthapptrustworthinesschecklist
_version_ 1724551750327730176