Development of the mHealth App Trustworthiness checklist
Background Mobile health applications (mHealth apps) currently lack a consensus on substantial quality and safety standards. As such, the number of individuals engaging with untrustworthy mHealth apps continues to grow at a steady pace. Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate end-user...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2019-11-01
|
Series: | Digital Health |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207619886463 |
id |
doaj-4903aab370264e4984689f5c4393aef0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4903aab370264e4984689f5c4393aef02020-11-25T03:36:02ZengSAGE PublishingDigital Health2055-20762019-11-01510.1177/2055207619886463Development of the mHealth App Trustworthiness checklistAfua van HaasterenFelix GilleMarta FaddaEffy VayenaBackground Mobile health applications (mHealth apps) currently lack a consensus on substantial quality and safety standards. As such, the number of individuals engaging with untrustworthy mHealth apps continues to grow at a steady pace. Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate end-users’ opinions on the features or actions necessary for trustworthy mHealth apps; and to convey this information to app developers via a succinct but informative checklist: the mHealth app trustworthiness checklist. Methods The checklist was formulated in three stages: (a) a literature review of studies identified the desirable features of the most prolific mHealth apps (health and fitness apps); (b) four focus group sessions with past or current users of these apps ( n = 20); and (c) expert feedback on whether the checklist items are conceivable in a real-life setting ( n = 6). Results Five major themes emerged from the focus group discussions: informational content, organizational attributes, societal influence, technology-related features, and user control factors. The mHealth app trustworthiness checklist was developed to incorporate these five themes and subsequently modified following expert consultation. In addition to the trustworthiness themes, we identified features that lie between trust and mistrust (limited digital literacy and indifference) as well as 10 features and actions that cause end-users to mistrust mHealth apps. Conclusion This study contributes to the evidence base on the attributes of trustworthy mHealth apps. The mHealth app trustworthiness checklist is a useful tool in advancing continued efforts to ensure that health technologies are trustworthy.https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207619886463 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Afua van Haasteren Felix Gille Marta Fadda Effy Vayena |
spellingShingle |
Afua van Haasteren Felix Gille Marta Fadda Effy Vayena Development of the mHealth App Trustworthiness checklist Digital Health |
author_facet |
Afua van Haasteren Felix Gille Marta Fadda Effy Vayena |
author_sort |
Afua van Haasteren |
title |
Development of the mHealth App Trustworthiness checklist |
title_short |
Development of the mHealth App Trustworthiness checklist |
title_full |
Development of the mHealth App Trustworthiness checklist |
title_fullStr |
Development of the mHealth App Trustworthiness checklist |
title_full_unstemmed |
Development of the mHealth App Trustworthiness checklist |
title_sort |
development of the mhealth app trustworthiness checklist |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Digital Health |
issn |
2055-2076 |
publishDate |
2019-11-01 |
description |
Background Mobile health applications (mHealth apps) currently lack a consensus on substantial quality and safety standards. As such, the number of individuals engaging with untrustworthy mHealth apps continues to grow at a steady pace. Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate end-users’ opinions on the features or actions necessary for trustworthy mHealth apps; and to convey this information to app developers via a succinct but informative checklist: the mHealth app trustworthiness checklist. Methods The checklist was formulated in three stages: (a) a literature review of studies identified the desirable features of the most prolific mHealth apps (health and fitness apps); (b) four focus group sessions with past or current users of these apps ( n = 20); and (c) expert feedback on whether the checklist items are conceivable in a real-life setting ( n = 6). Results Five major themes emerged from the focus group discussions: informational content, organizational attributes, societal influence, technology-related features, and user control factors. The mHealth app trustworthiness checklist was developed to incorporate these five themes and subsequently modified following expert consultation. In addition to the trustworthiness themes, we identified features that lie between trust and mistrust (limited digital literacy and indifference) as well as 10 features and actions that cause end-users to mistrust mHealth apps. Conclusion This study contributes to the evidence base on the attributes of trustworthy mHealth apps. The mHealth app trustworthiness checklist is a useful tool in advancing continued efforts to ensure that health technologies are trustworthy. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207619886463 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT afuavanhaasteren developmentofthemhealthapptrustworthinesschecklist AT felixgille developmentofthemhealthapptrustworthinesschecklist AT martafadda developmentofthemhealthapptrustworthinesschecklist AT effyvayena developmentofthemhealthapptrustworthinesschecklist |
_version_ |
1724551750327730176 |