Communities Beyond Society: Divergence of Local Prehistories on the Bothnian Arc, Northern Europe

This article presents a comparison of material records of two nearby regions on the coast of the Bothnian Bay. The timeframe is 5300–2000 BCE. The focus is on regional differences, which indicate a schizmogenesis of communal identities. The study calls for a reorientation of research concerning Fenn...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hakonen Aki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2021-04-01
Series:Open Archaeology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2020-0132
id doaj-4920b7d132f04d15912a5dba02929a01
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4920b7d132f04d15912a5dba02929a012021-10-03T07:42:40ZengDe GruyterOpen Archaeology2300-65602021-04-017121123010.1515/opar-2020-0132Communities Beyond Society: Divergence of Local Prehistories on the Bothnian Arc, Northern EuropeHakonen Aki0Archaeology Department, University of Oulu, P. O. Box 8000, FI-90014 Oulu, FinlandThis article presents a comparison of material records of two nearby regions on the coast of the Bothnian Bay. The timeframe is 5300–2000 BCE. The focus is on regional differences, which indicate a schizmogenesis of communal identities. The study calls for a reorientation of research concerning Fennoscandian prehistory. More attention should be paid to localized prehistories. It is argued that when prehistoric society is used as a fundamental group category, especially in the context of forager communities, the modern concept of state society distorts the underlying framework. Focusing on the regional level by constructing local prehistoric narratives limits the anachronistic effect and allows the proliferation of local communal identities. Such local prehistories, when collated and compared, offer a pathway to understanding prehistoric stateless societies, which are misrepresented by simplistic material cultural zones and the inherent homogeny ingrained within the concept of society. In this paper, the analysis is focused on practices representing local traditions. Two divergent themes that arise from the local prehistoric narratives are the Late Mesolithic use of local stone materials and regional changes in Neolithic dwelling forms.https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2020-0132prehistoryforagercommunal identityschizmogenesiscommunity of practicebothnian bay
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hakonen Aki
spellingShingle Hakonen Aki
Communities Beyond Society: Divergence of Local Prehistories on the Bothnian Arc, Northern Europe
Open Archaeology
prehistory
forager
communal identity
schizmogenesis
community of practice
bothnian bay
author_facet Hakonen Aki
author_sort Hakonen Aki
title Communities Beyond Society: Divergence of Local Prehistories on the Bothnian Arc, Northern Europe
title_short Communities Beyond Society: Divergence of Local Prehistories on the Bothnian Arc, Northern Europe
title_full Communities Beyond Society: Divergence of Local Prehistories on the Bothnian Arc, Northern Europe
title_fullStr Communities Beyond Society: Divergence of Local Prehistories on the Bothnian Arc, Northern Europe
title_full_unstemmed Communities Beyond Society: Divergence of Local Prehistories on the Bothnian Arc, Northern Europe
title_sort communities beyond society: divergence of local prehistories on the bothnian arc, northern europe
publisher De Gruyter
series Open Archaeology
issn 2300-6560
publishDate 2021-04-01
description This article presents a comparison of material records of two nearby regions on the coast of the Bothnian Bay. The timeframe is 5300–2000 BCE. The focus is on regional differences, which indicate a schizmogenesis of communal identities. The study calls for a reorientation of research concerning Fennoscandian prehistory. More attention should be paid to localized prehistories. It is argued that when prehistoric society is used as a fundamental group category, especially in the context of forager communities, the modern concept of state society distorts the underlying framework. Focusing on the regional level by constructing local prehistoric narratives limits the anachronistic effect and allows the proliferation of local communal identities. Such local prehistories, when collated and compared, offer a pathway to understanding prehistoric stateless societies, which are misrepresented by simplistic material cultural zones and the inherent homogeny ingrained within the concept of society. In this paper, the analysis is focused on practices representing local traditions. Two divergent themes that arise from the local prehistoric narratives are the Late Mesolithic use of local stone materials and regional changes in Neolithic dwelling forms.
topic prehistory
forager
communal identity
schizmogenesis
community of practice
bothnian bay
url https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2020-0132
work_keys_str_mv AT hakonenaki communitiesbeyondsocietydivergenceoflocalprehistoriesonthebothnianarcnortherneurope
_version_ 1716845877052571648