Surface Hardness of Nanohybrid and Microhybrid Resin Composites Cured by Light Emitting Diode and Quartz Tungsten Halogen Light Curing Systems: An Invitro Study

Introduction: New generation composite resin materials have revolutionized the art of aesthetic dentistry. The clinical success is dependent on effective polymerisation and surface hardness which in turn are dependent on the performance of Light Curing Units (LCU). This study utilises surface ha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anuradha Vitthal Wankhade, Sharad Basavraj Kamat, Santosh Irappa Hugar, Girish Shankar Nanjannawar, Sumit Balasaheb Vhate
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2020-07-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/13834/43875_CE[Ra1]_F(SHU)_PF1(Kri_KM)_PFA(KM)_PN(SL).pdf
id doaj-49c3b2f1a2c14306bc63374f421dea39
record_format Article
spelling doaj-49c3b2f1a2c14306bc63374f421dea392021-01-18T06:36:33ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2020-07-01147010610.7860/JCDR/2020/43875.13834Surface Hardness of Nanohybrid and Microhybrid Resin Composites Cured by Light Emitting Diode and Quartz Tungsten Halogen Light Curing Systems: An Invitro StudyAnuradha Vitthal WankhadeSharad Basavraj KamatSantosh Irappa HugarGirish Shankar NanjannawarSumit Balasaheb VhateIntroduction: New generation composite resin materials have revolutionized the art of aesthetic dentistry. The clinical success is dependent on effective polymerisation and surface hardness which in turn are dependent on the performance of Light Curing Units (LCU). This study utilises surface hardness as a measure of degree of polymerisation of composite resins achieved by LCUs. Aim: To evaluate the difference in surface hardness of nanohybrid and microhybrid resin composites cured by light curing systems, Light Emitting Diode (LED) and Quartz Tungsten Halogen (QTH). Materials and Methods: In this invitro experimental study, two types of hybrid composites (Nanohybrid and Microhybrid) were tested for surface hardness by using two different light curing systems (LED and QTH). All the Nanohybrid and Microhybrid specimens were cured using LED and QTH LCUs, thus giving four combinations. A total of 60 specimens (6 mm diameter and 2 mm depth) were prepared using Teflon mould with 15 samples for each combination. Surface hardness was measured on upper and lower surface after 24 hours and hardness ratio was calculated. Data was analysed using independent t-test for intergroup comparison. Level of significance was kept at 5%. Results: Surface hardness of resin composites cured by LED LCU was greater than those cured by QTH LCU. Additionally, the hardness value was greater for the upper surface. Nanohybrids showed better surface hardness than Microhybrids for both the LCUs. Conclusion: Nanohybrid composite resins and LED system were found to be more effective in terms of surface hardness as compared to their counterparts.https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/13834/43875_CE[Ra1]_F(SHU)_PF1(Kri_KM)_PFA(KM)_PN(SL).pdfdental materialshybrid compositespolymerisationrestorative dentistryvickers hardness test
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anuradha Vitthal Wankhade
Sharad Basavraj Kamat
Santosh Irappa Hugar
Girish Shankar Nanjannawar
Sumit Balasaheb Vhate
spellingShingle Anuradha Vitthal Wankhade
Sharad Basavraj Kamat
Santosh Irappa Hugar
Girish Shankar Nanjannawar
Sumit Balasaheb Vhate
Surface Hardness of Nanohybrid and Microhybrid Resin Composites Cured by Light Emitting Diode and Quartz Tungsten Halogen Light Curing Systems: An Invitro Study
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
dental materials
hybrid composites
polymerisation
restorative dentistry
vickers hardness test
author_facet Anuradha Vitthal Wankhade
Sharad Basavraj Kamat
Santosh Irappa Hugar
Girish Shankar Nanjannawar
Sumit Balasaheb Vhate
author_sort Anuradha Vitthal Wankhade
title Surface Hardness of Nanohybrid and Microhybrid Resin Composites Cured by Light Emitting Diode and Quartz Tungsten Halogen Light Curing Systems: An Invitro Study
title_short Surface Hardness of Nanohybrid and Microhybrid Resin Composites Cured by Light Emitting Diode and Quartz Tungsten Halogen Light Curing Systems: An Invitro Study
title_full Surface Hardness of Nanohybrid and Microhybrid Resin Composites Cured by Light Emitting Diode and Quartz Tungsten Halogen Light Curing Systems: An Invitro Study
title_fullStr Surface Hardness of Nanohybrid and Microhybrid Resin Composites Cured by Light Emitting Diode and Quartz Tungsten Halogen Light Curing Systems: An Invitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Surface Hardness of Nanohybrid and Microhybrid Resin Composites Cured by Light Emitting Diode and Quartz Tungsten Halogen Light Curing Systems: An Invitro Study
title_sort surface hardness of nanohybrid and microhybrid resin composites cured by light emitting diode and quartz tungsten halogen light curing systems: an invitro study
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
series Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
issn 2249-782X
0973-709X
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Introduction: New generation composite resin materials have revolutionized the art of aesthetic dentistry. The clinical success is dependent on effective polymerisation and surface hardness which in turn are dependent on the performance of Light Curing Units (LCU). This study utilises surface hardness as a measure of degree of polymerisation of composite resins achieved by LCUs. Aim: To evaluate the difference in surface hardness of nanohybrid and microhybrid resin composites cured by light curing systems, Light Emitting Diode (LED) and Quartz Tungsten Halogen (QTH). Materials and Methods: In this invitro experimental study, two types of hybrid composites (Nanohybrid and Microhybrid) were tested for surface hardness by using two different light curing systems (LED and QTH). All the Nanohybrid and Microhybrid specimens were cured using LED and QTH LCUs, thus giving four combinations. A total of 60 specimens (6 mm diameter and 2 mm depth) were prepared using Teflon mould with 15 samples for each combination. Surface hardness was measured on upper and lower surface after 24 hours and hardness ratio was calculated. Data was analysed using independent t-test for intergroup comparison. Level of significance was kept at 5%. Results: Surface hardness of resin composites cured by LED LCU was greater than those cured by QTH LCU. Additionally, the hardness value was greater for the upper surface. Nanohybrids showed better surface hardness than Microhybrids for both the LCUs. Conclusion: Nanohybrid composite resins and LED system were found to be more effective in terms of surface hardness as compared to their counterparts.
topic dental materials
hybrid composites
polymerisation
restorative dentistry
vickers hardness test
url https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/13834/43875_CE[Ra1]_F(SHU)_PF1(Kri_KM)_PFA(KM)_PN(SL).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT anuradhavitthalwankhade surfacehardnessofnanohybridandmicrohybridresincompositescuredbylightemittingdiodeandquartztungstenhalogenlightcuringsystemsaninvitrostudy
AT sharadbasavrajkamat surfacehardnessofnanohybridandmicrohybridresincompositescuredbylightemittingdiodeandquartztungstenhalogenlightcuringsystemsaninvitrostudy
AT santoshirappahugar surfacehardnessofnanohybridandmicrohybridresincompositescuredbylightemittingdiodeandquartztungstenhalogenlightcuringsystemsaninvitrostudy
AT girishshankarnanjannawar surfacehardnessofnanohybridandmicrohybridresincompositescuredbylightemittingdiodeandquartztungstenhalogenlightcuringsystemsaninvitrostudy
AT sumitbalasahebvhate surfacehardnessofnanohybridandmicrohybridresincompositescuredbylightemittingdiodeandquartztungstenhalogenlightcuringsystemsaninvitrostudy
_version_ 1724333686281732096