The problem of the justification of basic knowledge
The purpose of this paper is to analyse the justification problem of the basic knowledge and offer a non-inferential solution based on a kind of deflacionary non-evidentialist justification from the notions of <em>entitlement </em>and <em>rational warrant</em>. The problem in...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
2019-03-01
|
| Series: | Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/ASHF/article/view/63369 |
| Summary: | The purpose of this paper is to analyse the justification problem of the basic knowledge and offer a non-inferential solution based on a kind of deflacionary non-evidentialist justification from the notions of <em>entitlement </em>and <em>rational warrant</em>. The problem in the case of the basic logical knowledge, in general, is that to justify inferentially logical rules involves using logical principles, thus a vicious circle is generated. We examine the feasibility of Wright’s non-inferentialist approach and we state that a rational warrant is a feasible answer to the problem of basic logical knowledge. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0211-2337 1988-2564 |