Decision Tree and AHP Methods Application for Projects Assessment: A Case Study

This research is dedicated to the modelling of decision process occurring during the implementation of construction projects. Recent studies generally do not assess the robustness of the decisions regarding the possible changes during the construction project implementation. However, such an assessm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Augustinas Maceika, Andrej Bugajev, Olga Regina Šostak, Tatjana Vilutienė
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-05-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5502
id doaj-4e8ccb4a9ec34798bb9e3d79057f81c2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4e8ccb4a9ec34798bb9e3d79057f81c22021-06-01T00:02:02ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502021-05-01135502550210.3390/su13105502Decision Tree and AHP Methods Application for Projects Assessment: A Case StudyAugustinas Maceika0Andrej Bugajev1Olga Regina Šostak2Tatjana Vilutienė3The Faculty of Mechanics, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio Ave. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, LithuaniaThe Faculty of Fundamental Sciences, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio Ave. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, LithuaniaThe Faculty of Fundamental Sciences, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio Ave. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, LithuaniaThe Faculty of Civil Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio Ave. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, LithuaniaThis research is dedicated to the modelling of decision process occurring during the implementation of construction projects. Recent studies generally do not assess the robustness of the decisions regarding the possible changes during the construction project implementation. However, such an assessment might increase the reliability of the decision-making process. We addressed this gap through a new model that combines the decision-making process modelling with the AHP method and includes the analysis of model stability concerning stakeholders’ behaviour. We used the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Decision tree methods to model the decision-making process. The proposed model was validated on a case study of multiple construction projects. The assessment was performed from individual investor’s and independent expert’s perspectives. The criteria for the assessment were selected according to the principles of sustainability. We performed the sensitivity analysis, making it possible to assess the possible changes of the decisions depending on the potential patterns of the decision-makers’ behaviour. The results of the study show that, sometimes, small fluctuations in the project factors affect the project selection indicating the possible lack of the robustness of the project decisions.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5502project assessmentsustainability criteriadecision treeanalytic hierarchy processconstruction projectssensitivity analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Augustinas Maceika
Andrej Bugajev
Olga Regina Šostak
Tatjana Vilutienė
spellingShingle Augustinas Maceika
Andrej Bugajev
Olga Regina Šostak
Tatjana Vilutienė
Decision Tree and AHP Methods Application for Projects Assessment: A Case Study
Sustainability
project assessment
sustainability criteria
decision tree
analytic hierarchy process
construction projects
sensitivity analysis
author_facet Augustinas Maceika
Andrej Bugajev
Olga Regina Šostak
Tatjana Vilutienė
author_sort Augustinas Maceika
title Decision Tree and AHP Methods Application for Projects Assessment: A Case Study
title_short Decision Tree and AHP Methods Application for Projects Assessment: A Case Study
title_full Decision Tree and AHP Methods Application for Projects Assessment: A Case Study
title_fullStr Decision Tree and AHP Methods Application for Projects Assessment: A Case Study
title_full_unstemmed Decision Tree and AHP Methods Application for Projects Assessment: A Case Study
title_sort decision tree and ahp methods application for projects assessment: a case study
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2021-05-01
description This research is dedicated to the modelling of decision process occurring during the implementation of construction projects. Recent studies generally do not assess the robustness of the decisions regarding the possible changes during the construction project implementation. However, such an assessment might increase the reliability of the decision-making process. We addressed this gap through a new model that combines the decision-making process modelling with the AHP method and includes the analysis of model stability concerning stakeholders’ behaviour. We used the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Decision tree methods to model the decision-making process. The proposed model was validated on a case study of multiple construction projects. The assessment was performed from individual investor’s and independent expert’s perspectives. The criteria for the assessment were selected according to the principles of sustainability. We performed the sensitivity analysis, making it possible to assess the possible changes of the decisions depending on the potential patterns of the decision-makers’ behaviour. The results of the study show that, sometimes, small fluctuations in the project factors affect the project selection indicating the possible lack of the robustness of the project decisions.
topic project assessment
sustainability criteria
decision tree
analytic hierarchy process
construction projects
sensitivity analysis
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5502
work_keys_str_mv AT augustinasmaceika decisiontreeandahpmethodsapplicationforprojectsassessmentacasestudy
AT andrejbugajev decisiontreeandahpmethodsapplicationforprojectsassessmentacasestudy
AT olgareginasostak decisiontreeandahpmethodsapplicationforprojectsassessmentacasestudy
AT tatjanavilutiene decisiontreeandahpmethodsapplicationforprojectsassessmentacasestudy
_version_ 1721415875048767488