Copper Analysis by Two Different Procedures of Sequential Extraction after Electrodialytic Remediation of Mine Tailings

The analysis of Cu distribution in pre-treated mine tailings after electrodialytic remediation was carried out by using two methods of sequential extraction. The initial content of copper in the tailings was 1109 mg Cu/kg of dry tailing, where close to 40% of the sample in weight corresponded to a s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrea Lazo, Pamela Lazo, Alejandra Urtubia, María Gabriela Lobos, Claudia Gutiérrez, Henrik K. Hansen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-10-01
Series:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/20/3957
Description
Summary:The analysis of Cu distribution in pre-treated mine tailings after electrodialytic remediation was carried out by using two methods of sequential extraction. The initial content of copper in the tailings was 1109 mg Cu/kg of dry tailing, where close to 40% of the sample in weight corresponded to a soluble fraction. The tailing was treated with a leaching solution for 24 h. Three different solutions were tested: H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> + HNO<sub>3</sub> with pH = 1.9; H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> + HNO<sub>3</sub> with pH = 4.2; and NH<sub>4</sub>Cl 0.8 mol/L with pH = 5.5. After that, electrodialytic remediation experiments were carried out using an electric field of 2.7 V/cm for 15 days. The best performance for the complete cell was obtained with H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> + HNO<sub>3</sub> solutions, with a copper removal efficiency in the range of 62% to 67% and a current efficiency between 6% and 9%. The results of the remaining copper concentration between anode and cathode, from both procedures of sequential extraction, showed similar trends. The differences were mainly attributed to the use of different extractant solutions and extraction times. Soluble and exchangeable fractions were easily removed, with efficiencies higher than 80%. The lowest copper removal efficiency was obtained with NH<sub>4</sub>Cl 0.8 mol/L.
ISSN:1660-4601