How to proceed for a continuous quality improvement in National Bibligraphy of Iran? A Delphy study

<br />Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify the components of quality in a national bibliography and the methods and procedures for improving and maintaining quality in the National Bibliography of Iran based on the knowledge and experience of some of its producers who formed a Del...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Farzaneh Shadanpour, Nosrat Riahinia
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Central Library of Astan Quds Razavi 2019-10-01
Series:کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی
Subjects:
Online Access:http://lis.aqr-libjournal.ir/article_93247_6cbf52b2d74341b729a441014eb99a7e.pdf
id doaj-570a43946beb454eae7d72a92b9b818a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-570a43946beb454eae7d72a92b9b818a2020-11-25T03:23:35ZfasCentral Library of Astan Quds Razaviکتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی1680-96372676-59772019-10-01223376110.30481/lis.2019.171625.151293247How to proceed for a continuous quality improvement in National Bibligraphy of Iran? A Delphy studyFarzaneh Shadanpour0Nosrat Riahinia1Faculty member (Instructor) of the National Library and Archives of the Islamic Republic of Iran; PhD Student in Knowledge and Information Science, Faculty of Education Sciences and Psychology, Kharazmi University,Professor of Knowledge and Information Science, Faculty of Education Sciences and Psychology, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran<br />Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify the components of quality in a national bibliography and the methods and procedures for improving and maintaining quality in the National Bibliography of Iran based on the knowledge and experience of some of its producers who formed a Delphy panel to conduct the research. <br /> Research method: A Delphi technique has been used to conduct the research with a panel of 22 cataloging and classification experts and practitioners from the Technical Services Department of the National Library of Iran. Relative questionnaires for two rounds of the Delphy were set in a 5 point Lickert scale comprising items extracted from the research literature and the Delphy panels'' answers to the open questions. The mean and standard deviation were used to measure the agreement. <br /> Findings: At the level of record, the panel members identified as quality components in the record: accuracy and conformance to the agreed standards and instructions, not having spelling and typos mistakes, providing a description as close to the source as possible in order to better understanding of the user from the catalogued item, the ability to access the resource by having at least information about the source through the record, adequacy, accuracy, and ordering the importance in assigning the subject headings, accuracy of call numbers and added entries, and the fulfillment of native requirements, such as language and script; at the level of the National Bibliography the panel members decided to mention the ease of use and access, and consistency at different levels of description as most important; in terms of quality control activities the panel perceived the quality control of all levels of descriptions, MARC blocks and fields, typographic and spelling error checking, uniformity in the transcription of non-Persian documents as the most important. In terms of methods and procedures for improving and maintaining quality in the National Bibliography of Iran the decision-making and procedural uniformity, avoidance of outsourcing, whether in cataloging, or in evaluating and controlling its quality, emphasizing on the empowerment of catalogers, training qualified catalogers were subject of consensus. Also, gaining professional and related knowledge and use of new technologies, improvement of factors related to job satisfaction, and welcoming feedback from all categories of users have been pointed out among the most important methods and procedures.<br /> Results: In overall, statements suggest a tendency towards scientific dynamism which requires providing proper facilities and conditions. Also a kind of perfectionism, and self-sufficiency, while seeking to maintain professional autonomy among the catalogers of the National Library of Iran have been perceived, which requires intelligent and far-seeing high level managers, who must be professional in the field of cataloging, and even in broader term, information organization and management, as well as being aware of the problems and challenges of the field.http://lis.aqr-libjournal.ir/article_93247_6cbf52b2d74341b729a441014eb99a7e.pdfinformation organizationcatalogingnational bibliography of iranquality
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Farzaneh Shadanpour
Nosrat Riahinia
spellingShingle Farzaneh Shadanpour
Nosrat Riahinia
How to proceed for a continuous quality improvement in National Bibligraphy of Iran? A Delphy study
کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی
information organization
cataloging
national bibliography of iran
quality
author_facet Farzaneh Shadanpour
Nosrat Riahinia
author_sort Farzaneh Shadanpour
title How to proceed for a continuous quality improvement in National Bibligraphy of Iran? A Delphy study
title_short How to proceed for a continuous quality improvement in National Bibligraphy of Iran? A Delphy study
title_full How to proceed for a continuous quality improvement in National Bibligraphy of Iran? A Delphy study
title_fullStr How to proceed for a continuous quality improvement in National Bibligraphy of Iran? A Delphy study
title_full_unstemmed How to proceed for a continuous quality improvement in National Bibligraphy of Iran? A Delphy study
title_sort how to proceed for a continuous quality improvement in national bibligraphy of iran? a delphy study
publisher Central Library of Astan Quds Razavi
series کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی
issn 1680-9637
2676-5977
publishDate 2019-10-01
description <br />Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify the components of quality in a national bibliography and the methods and procedures for improving and maintaining quality in the National Bibliography of Iran based on the knowledge and experience of some of its producers who formed a Delphy panel to conduct the research. <br /> Research method: A Delphi technique has been used to conduct the research with a panel of 22 cataloging and classification experts and practitioners from the Technical Services Department of the National Library of Iran. Relative questionnaires for two rounds of the Delphy were set in a 5 point Lickert scale comprising items extracted from the research literature and the Delphy panels'' answers to the open questions. The mean and standard deviation were used to measure the agreement. <br /> Findings: At the level of record, the panel members identified as quality components in the record: accuracy and conformance to the agreed standards and instructions, not having spelling and typos mistakes, providing a description as close to the source as possible in order to better understanding of the user from the catalogued item, the ability to access the resource by having at least information about the source through the record, adequacy, accuracy, and ordering the importance in assigning the subject headings, accuracy of call numbers and added entries, and the fulfillment of native requirements, such as language and script; at the level of the National Bibliography the panel members decided to mention the ease of use and access, and consistency at different levels of description as most important; in terms of quality control activities the panel perceived the quality control of all levels of descriptions, MARC blocks and fields, typographic and spelling error checking, uniformity in the transcription of non-Persian documents as the most important. In terms of methods and procedures for improving and maintaining quality in the National Bibliography of Iran the decision-making and procedural uniformity, avoidance of outsourcing, whether in cataloging, or in evaluating and controlling its quality, emphasizing on the empowerment of catalogers, training qualified catalogers were subject of consensus. Also, gaining professional and related knowledge and use of new technologies, improvement of factors related to job satisfaction, and welcoming feedback from all categories of users have been pointed out among the most important methods and procedures.<br /> Results: In overall, statements suggest a tendency towards scientific dynamism which requires providing proper facilities and conditions. Also a kind of perfectionism, and self-sufficiency, while seeking to maintain professional autonomy among the catalogers of the National Library of Iran have been perceived, which requires intelligent and far-seeing high level managers, who must be professional in the field of cataloging, and even in broader term, information organization and management, as well as being aware of the problems and challenges of the field.
topic information organization
cataloging
national bibliography of iran
quality
url http://lis.aqr-libjournal.ir/article_93247_6cbf52b2d74341b729a441014eb99a7e.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT farzanehshadanpour howtoproceedforacontinuousqualityimprovementinnationalbibligraphyofiranadelphystudy
AT nosratriahinia howtoproceedforacontinuousqualityimprovementinnationalbibligraphyofiranadelphystudy
_version_ 1724605584088498176