Class II malocclusion occlusal severity description

OBJECTIVES: It is well known that the efficacy and the efficiency of a Class II malocclusion treatment are aspects closely related to the severity of the dental anteroposterior discrepancy. Even though, sample selection based on cephalometric variables without considering the severity of the occlusa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guilherme Janson, Renata Sathler, Thais Maria Freire Fernandes, Marcelo Zanda, Arnaldo Pinzan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of São Paulo 2010-08-01
Series:Journal of Applied Oral Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572010000400013
id doaj-578c423d896e40a38cbeefe6a89a2826
record_format Article
spelling doaj-578c423d896e40a38cbeefe6a89a28262020-11-24T23:14:20ZengUniversity of São PauloJournal of Applied Oral Science1678-77571678-77652010-08-0118439740210.1590/S1678-77572010000400013Class II malocclusion occlusal severity descriptionGuilherme JansonRenata SathlerThais Maria Freire FernandesMarcelo ZandaArnaldo PinzanOBJECTIVES: It is well known that the efficacy and the efficiency of a Class II malocclusion treatment are aspects closely related to the severity of the dental anteroposterior discrepancy. Even though, sample selection based on cephalometric variables without considering the severity of the occlusal anteroposterior discrepancy is still common in current papers. In some of them, when occlusal parameters are chosen, the severity is often neglected. The purpose of this study is to verify the importance given to the classification of Class II malocclusion, based on the criteria used for sample selection in a great number of papers published in the orthodontic journal with the highest impact factor. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A search was performed in PubMed database for full-text research papers referencing Class II malocclusion in the history of the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (AJO-DO). RESULTS: A total of 359 papers were retrieved, among which only 72 (20.06%) papers described the occlusal severity of the Class II malocclusion sample. In the other 287 (79.94%) papers that did not specify the anteroposterior discrepancy severity, description was considered to be crucial in 159 (55.40%) of them. CONCLUSIONS: Omission in describing the occlusal severity demands a cautious interpretation of 44.29% of the papers retrieved in this study.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572010000400013MalocclusionSeverity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Guilherme Janson
Renata Sathler
Thais Maria Freire Fernandes
Marcelo Zanda
Arnaldo Pinzan
spellingShingle Guilherme Janson
Renata Sathler
Thais Maria Freire Fernandes
Marcelo Zanda
Arnaldo Pinzan
Class II malocclusion occlusal severity description
Journal of Applied Oral Science
Malocclusion
Severity
author_facet Guilherme Janson
Renata Sathler
Thais Maria Freire Fernandes
Marcelo Zanda
Arnaldo Pinzan
author_sort Guilherme Janson
title Class II malocclusion occlusal severity description
title_short Class II malocclusion occlusal severity description
title_full Class II malocclusion occlusal severity description
title_fullStr Class II malocclusion occlusal severity description
title_full_unstemmed Class II malocclusion occlusal severity description
title_sort class ii malocclusion occlusal severity description
publisher University of São Paulo
series Journal of Applied Oral Science
issn 1678-7757
1678-7765
publishDate 2010-08-01
description OBJECTIVES: It is well known that the efficacy and the efficiency of a Class II malocclusion treatment are aspects closely related to the severity of the dental anteroposterior discrepancy. Even though, sample selection based on cephalometric variables without considering the severity of the occlusal anteroposterior discrepancy is still common in current papers. In some of them, when occlusal parameters are chosen, the severity is often neglected. The purpose of this study is to verify the importance given to the classification of Class II malocclusion, based on the criteria used for sample selection in a great number of papers published in the orthodontic journal with the highest impact factor. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A search was performed in PubMed database for full-text research papers referencing Class II malocclusion in the history of the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (AJO-DO). RESULTS: A total of 359 papers were retrieved, among which only 72 (20.06%) papers described the occlusal severity of the Class II malocclusion sample. In the other 287 (79.94%) papers that did not specify the anteroposterior discrepancy severity, description was considered to be crucial in 159 (55.40%) of them. CONCLUSIONS: Omission in describing the occlusal severity demands a cautious interpretation of 44.29% of the papers retrieved in this study.
topic Malocclusion
Severity
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572010000400013
work_keys_str_mv AT guilhermejanson classiimalocclusionocclusalseveritydescription
AT renatasathler classiimalocclusionocclusalseveritydescription
AT thaismariafreirefernandes classiimalocclusionocclusalseveritydescription
AT marcelozanda classiimalocclusionocclusalseveritydescription
AT arnaldopinzan classiimalocclusionocclusalseveritydescription
_version_ 1725594907799715840