Dynamic Modeling of Indole Glucosinolate Hydrolysis and Its Impact on Auxin Signaling

Plants release chemicals to deter attackers. Arabidopsis thaliana relies on multiple defense compounds, including indol-3-ylmethyl glucosinolate (I3G), which upon hydrolysis initiated by myrosinase enzymes releases a multitude of bioactive compounds, among others, indole-3-acetonitrile and indole-3-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel Vik, Namiko Mitarai, Nikolai Wulff, Barbara A. Halkier, Meike Burow
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Plant Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2018.00550/full
id doaj-5795b3250f5749268b638c89f666b87f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5795b3250f5749268b638c89f666b87f2020-11-24T21:24:54ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Plant Science1664-462X2018-04-01910.3389/fpls.2018.00550330180Dynamic Modeling of Indole Glucosinolate Hydrolysis and Its Impact on Auxin SignalingDaniel Vik0Namiko Mitarai1Nikolai Wulff2Barbara A. Halkier3Meike Burow4DynaMo Center, Copenhagen Plant Science Centre, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, DenmarkCenter for Models of Life, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkDynaMo Center, Copenhagen Plant Science Centre, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, DenmarkDynaMo Center, Copenhagen Plant Science Centre, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, DenmarkDynaMo Center, Copenhagen Plant Science Centre, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, DenmarkPlants release chemicals to deter attackers. Arabidopsis thaliana relies on multiple defense compounds, including indol-3-ylmethyl glucosinolate (I3G), which upon hydrolysis initiated by myrosinase enzymes releases a multitude of bioactive compounds, among others, indole-3-acetonitrile and indole-3-acetoisothiocyanate. The highly unstable isothiocyanate rapidly reacts with other molecules. One of the products, indole-3-carbinol, was reported to inhibit auxin signaling through binding to the TIR1 auxin receptor. On the contrary, the nitrile product of I3G hydrolysis can be converted by nitrilase enzymes to form the primary auxin molecule, indole-3-acetic acid, which activates TIR1. This suggests that auxin signaling is subject to both antagonistic and protagonistic effects of I3G hydrolysis upon attack. We hypothesize that I3G hydrolysis and auxin signaling form an incoherent feedforward loop and we build a mathematical model to examine the regulatory network dynamics. We use molecular docking to investigate the possible antagonistic properties of different I3G hydrolysis products by competitive binding to the TIR1 receptor. Our simulations reveal an uncoupling of auxin concentration and signaling, and we determine that enzyme activity and antagonist binding affinity are key parameters for this uncoupling. The molecular docking predicts that several I3G hydrolysis products strongly antagonize auxin signaling. By comparing a tissue disrupting attack – e.g., by chewing insects or necrotrophic pathogens that causes rapid release of I3G hydrolysis products – to sustained cell-autonomous I3G hydrolysis, e.g., upon infection by biotrophic pathogens, we find that each scenario gives rise to distinct auxin signaling dynamics. This suggests that plants have different defense versus growth strategies depending on the nature of the attack.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2018.00550/fullmathematical modelingindole glucosinolate hydrolysisauxin signalingmyrosinasesspecifier proteinnitrilase
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniel Vik
Namiko Mitarai
Nikolai Wulff
Barbara A. Halkier
Meike Burow
spellingShingle Daniel Vik
Namiko Mitarai
Nikolai Wulff
Barbara A. Halkier
Meike Burow
Dynamic Modeling of Indole Glucosinolate Hydrolysis and Its Impact on Auxin Signaling
Frontiers in Plant Science
mathematical modeling
indole glucosinolate hydrolysis
auxin signaling
myrosinases
specifier protein
nitrilase
author_facet Daniel Vik
Namiko Mitarai
Nikolai Wulff
Barbara A. Halkier
Meike Burow
author_sort Daniel Vik
title Dynamic Modeling of Indole Glucosinolate Hydrolysis and Its Impact on Auxin Signaling
title_short Dynamic Modeling of Indole Glucosinolate Hydrolysis and Its Impact on Auxin Signaling
title_full Dynamic Modeling of Indole Glucosinolate Hydrolysis and Its Impact on Auxin Signaling
title_fullStr Dynamic Modeling of Indole Glucosinolate Hydrolysis and Its Impact on Auxin Signaling
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic Modeling of Indole Glucosinolate Hydrolysis and Its Impact on Auxin Signaling
title_sort dynamic modeling of indole glucosinolate hydrolysis and its impact on auxin signaling
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Plant Science
issn 1664-462X
publishDate 2018-04-01
description Plants release chemicals to deter attackers. Arabidopsis thaliana relies on multiple defense compounds, including indol-3-ylmethyl glucosinolate (I3G), which upon hydrolysis initiated by myrosinase enzymes releases a multitude of bioactive compounds, among others, indole-3-acetonitrile and indole-3-acetoisothiocyanate. The highly unstable isothiocyanate rapidly reacts with other molecules. One of the products, indole-3-carbinol, was reported to inhibit auxin signaling through binding to the TIR1 auxin receptor. On the contrary, the nitrile product of I3G hydrolysis can be converted by nitrilase enzymes to form the primary auxin molecule, indole-3-acetic acid, which activates TIR1. This suggests that auxin signaling is subject to both antagonistic and protagonistic effects of I3G hydrolysis upon attack. We hypothesize that I3G hydrolysis and auxin signaling form an incoherent feedforward loop and we build a mathematical model to examine the regulatory network dynamics. We use molecular docking to investigate the possible antagonistic properties of different I3G hydrolysis products by competitive binding to the TIR1 receptor. Our simulations reveal an uncoupling of auxin concentration and signaling, and we determine that enzyme activity and antagonist binding affinity are key parameters for this uncoupling. The molecular docking predicts that several I3G hydrolysis products strongly antagonize auxin signaling. By comparing a tissue disrupting attack – e.g., by chewing insects or necrotrophic pathogens that causes rapid release of I3G hydrolysis products – to sustained cell-autonomous I3G hydrolysis, e.g., upon infection by biotrophic pathogens, we find that each scenario gives rise to distinct auxin signaling dynamics. This suggests that plants have different defense versus growth strategies depending on the nature of the attack.
topic mathematical modeling
indole glucosinolate hydrolysis
auxin signaling
myrosinases
specifier protein
nitrilase
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2018.00550/full
work_keys_str_mv AT danielvik dynamicmodelingofindoleglucosinolatehydrolysisanditsimpactonauxinsignaling
AT namikomitarai dynamicmodelingofindoleglucosinolatehydrolysisanditsimpactonauxinsignaling
AT nikolaiwulff dynamicmodelingofindoleglucosinolatehydrolysisanditsimpactonauxinsignaling
AT barbaraahalkier dynamicmodelingofindoleglucosinolatehydrolysisanditsimpactonauxinsignaling
AT meikeburow dynamicmodelingofindoleglucosinolatehydrolysisanditsimpactonauxinsignaling
_version_ 1725986229368913920