Interventions designed to reduce implicit prejudices and implicit stereotypes in real world contexts: a systematic review

Abstract Background Implicit biases are present in the general population and among professionals in various domains, where they can lead to discrimination. Many interventions are used to reduce implicit bias. However, uncertainties remain as to their effectiveness. Methods We conducted a systematic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chloë FitzGerald, Angela Martin, Delphine Berner, Samia Hurst
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-05-01
Series:BMC Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40359-019-0299-7
id doaj-597bb3579a814ab78efb4d695bb1f49c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-597bb3579a814ab78efb4d695bb1f49c2020-11-25T03:02:59ZengBMCBMC Psychology2050-72832019-05-017111210.1186/s40359-019-0299-7Interventions designed to reduce implicit prejudices and implicit stereotypes in real world contexts: a systematic reviewChloë FitzGerald0Angela Martin1Delphine Berner2Samia Hurst3iEH2 (Institute for Ethics, History and the Humanities), Faculty of Medicine, University of GenevaDepartment of Philosophy, University of FribourgiEH2 (Institute for Ethics, History and the Humanities), Faculty of Medicine, University of GenevaiEH2 (Institute for Ethics, History and the Humanities), Faculty of Medicine, University of GenevaAbstract Background Implicit biases are present in the general population and among professionals in various domains, where they can lead to discrimination. Many interventions are used to reduce implicit bias. However, uncertainties remain as to their effectiveness. Methods We conducted a systematic review by searching ERIC, PUBMED and PSYCHINFO for peer-reviewed studies conducted on adults between May 2005 and April 2015, testing interventions designed to reduce implicit bias, with results measured using the Implicit Association Test (IAT) or sufficiently similar methods. Results 30 articles were identified as eligible. Some techniques, such as engaging with others’ perspective, appear unfruitful, at least in short term implicit bias reduction, while other techniques, such as exposure to counterstereotypical exemplars, are more promising. Robust data is lacking for many of these interventions. Conclusions Caution is thus advised when it comes to programs aiming at reducing biases. This does not weaken the case for implementing widespread structural and institutional changes that are multiply justified.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40359-019-0299-7Implicit prejudiceImplicit stereotypeImplicit biasUnconscious biasInterventionsTraining
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chloë FitzGerald
Angela Martin
Delphine Berner
Samia Hurst
spellingShingle Chloë FitzGerald
Angela Martin
Delphine Berner
Samia Hurst
Interventions designed to reduce implicit prejudices and implicit stereotypes in real world contexts: a systematic review
BMC Psychology
Implicit prejudice
Implicit stereotype
Implicit bias
Unconscious bias
Interventions
Training
author_facet Chloë FitzGerald
Angela Martin
Delphine Berner
Samia Hurst
author_sort Chloë FitzGerald
title Interventions designed to reduce implicit prejudices and implicit stereotypes in real world contexts: a systematic review
title_short Interventions designed to reduce implicit prejudices and implicit stereotypes in real world contexts: a systematic review
title_full Interventions designed to reduce implicit prejudices and implicit stereotypes in real world contexts: a systematic review
title_fullStr Interventions designed to reduce implicit prejudices and implicit stereotypes in real world contexts: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Interventions designed to reduce implicit prejudices and implicit stereotypes in real world contexts: a systematic review
title_sort interventions designed to reduce implicit prejudices and implicit stereotypes in real world contexts: a systematic review
publisher BMC
series BMC Psychology
issn 2050-7283
publishDate 2019-05-01
description Abstract Background Implicit biases are present in the general population and among professionals in various domains, where they can lead to discrimination. Many interventions are used to reduce implicit bias. However, uncertainties remain as to their effectiveness. Methods We conducted a systematic review by searching ERIC, PUBMED and PSYCHINFO for peer-reviewed studies conducted on adults between May 2005 and April 2015, testing interventions designed to reduce implicit bias, with results measured using the Implicit Association Test (IAT) or sufficiently similar methods. Results 30 articles were identified as eligible. Some techniques, such as engaging with others’ perspective, appear unfruitful, at least in short term implicit bias reduction, while other techniques, such as exposure to counterstereotypical exemplars, are more promising. Robust data is lacking for many of these interventions. Conclusions Caution is thus advised when it comes to programs aiming at reducing biases. This does not weaken the case for implementing widespread structural and institutional changes that are multiply justified.
topic Implicit prejudice
Implicit stereotype
Implicit bias
Unconscious bias
Interventions
Training
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40359-019-0299-7
work_keys_str_mv AT chloefitzgerald interventionsdesignedtoreduceimplicitprejudicesandimplicitstereotypesinrealworldcontextsasystematicreview
AT angelamartin interventionsdesignedtoreduceimplicitprejudicesandimplicitstereotypesinrealworldcontextsasystematicreview
AT delphineberner interventionsdesignedtoreduceimplicitprejudicesandimplicitstereotypesinrealworldcontextsasystematicreview
AT samiahurst interventionsdesignedtoreduceimplicitprejudicesandimplicitstereotypesinrealworldcontextsasystematicreview
_version_ 1724687408027402240