Socioeconomic disparities in access to a hepatocellular carcinoma screening program in Brazil

OBJECTIVES: Cirrhotic patients must receive an abdominal ultrasound every 6 months as part of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening. The aim of this study was to assess if HCC screening was performed as recommended by the literature and to observe the differences between the private and public se...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Izabelle Venturini Signorelli, Patrícia Lofêgo Gonçalves, Luciana Lofêgo Gonçalves, Luiz Sérgio Emery Ferreira, Ana Tereza Parpaiola Mendonça, Gustavo Leite Franklin, Maria da Penha Zago Gomes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Faculdade de Medicina / USP
Series:Clinics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322016000700361&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-5c0957f1a9a943a191377b60eafd5de3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5c0957f1a9a943a191377b60eafd5de32020-11-25T00:07:24ZengFaculdade de Medicina / USPClinics1980-532271736136410.6061/clinics/2016(07)01S1807-59322016000700361Socioeconomic disparities in access to a hepatocellular carcinoma screening program in BrazilIzabelle Venturini SignorelliPatrícia Lofêgo GonçalvesLuciana Lofêgo GonçalvesLuiz Sérgio Emery FerreiraAna Tereza Parpaiola MendonçaGustavo Leite FranklinMaria da Penha Zago GomesOBJECTIVES: Cirrhotic patients must receive an abdominal ultrasound every 6 months as part of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening. The aim of this study was to assess if HCC screening was performed as recommended by the literature and to observe the differences between the private and public services in Brazil. METHODS: We analyzed data from the HCC screenings of 253 cirrhotic patients from the University Hospital (n=177) and private sector (n=76) in Vitória, ES, Brazil. RESULTS: Ultrasound screening was performed every 13.1 months on average (SD 9.02). In 37 out of 253 patients, the screenings were performed close to the recommended frequency; 16 were performed every 6 months, and 21 were mostly performed during the follow-up period every 6 months. In the remaining 216 cases, ultrasounds were not performed according to the guidelines; for 106 patients, less than 50% of all ultrasounds were performed every 6 months and 110 patients showed an interval greater than one year. Patients from the private sector received ultrasound screenings near the ideal in 28.9% of cases, while patients from the University Hospital received ultrasounds in only 8.4% of cases (p<0.0001). HCC was diagnosed in 30 patients (11.8%). For these 30 patients, 11 screenings were properly performed within 6 months (36.6%) and only 1 out of the 11 (9%) met the criteria for transplant. In the remaining 19 patients who did not receive the screening within 6 months, 6 (31.5%) did not meet the criteria for transplant. CONCLUSION: HCC screening in our environment was irregularly performed, mainly in the public service setting, which prevented early diagnosis in a large number of patients.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322016000700361&lng=en&tlng=enHepatocellular CarcinomaMass ScreeningDiagnosisLiver Cirrhosis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Izabelle Venturini Signorelli
Patrícia Lofêgo Gonçalves
Luciana Lofêgo Gonçalves
Luiz Sérgio Emery Ferreira
Ana Tereza Parpaiola Mendonça
Gustavo Leite Franklin
Maria da Penha Zago Gomes
spellingShingle Izabelle Venturini Signorelli
Patrícia Lofêgo Gonçalves
Luciana Lofêgo Gonçalves
Luiz Sérgio Emery Ferreira
Ana Tereza Parpaiola Mendonça
Gustavo Leite Franklin
Maria da Penha Zago Gomes
Socioeconomic disparities in access to a hepatocellular carcinoma screening program in Brazil
Clinics
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Mass Screening
Diagnosis
Liver Cirrhosis
author_facet Izabelle Venturini Signorelli
Patrícia Lofêgo Gonçalves
Luciana Lofêgo Gonçalves
Luiz Sérgio Emery Ferreira
Ana Tereza Parpaiola Mendonça
Gustavo Leite Franklin
Maria da Penha Zago Gomes
author_sort Izabelle Venturini Signorelli
title Socioeconomic disparities in access to a hepatocellular carcinoma screening program in Brazil
title_short Socioeconomic disparities in access to a hepatocellular carcinoma screening program in Brazil
title_full Socioeconomic disparities in access to a hepatocellular carcinoma screening program in Brazil
title_fullStr Socioeconomic disparities in access to a hepatocellular carcinoma screening program in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Socioeconomic disparities in access to a hepatocellular carcinoma screening program in Brazil
title_sort socioeconomic disparities in access to a hepatocellular carcinoma screening program in brazil
publisher Faculdade de Medicina / USP
series Clinics
issn 1980-5322
description OBJECTIVES: Cirrhotic patients must receive an abdominal ultrasound every 6 months as part of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening. The aim of this study was to assess if HCC screening was performed as recommended by the literature and to observe the differences between the private and public services in Brazil. METHODS: We analyzed data from the HCC screenings of 253 cirrhotic patients from the University Hospital (n=177) and private sector (n=76) in Vitória, ES, Brazil. RESULTS: Ultrasound screening was performed every 13.1 months on average (SD 9.02). In 37 out of 253 patients, the screenings were performed close to the recommended frequency; 16 were performed every 6 months, and 21 were mostly performed during the follow-up period every 6 months. In the remaining 216 cases, ultrasounds were not performed according to the guidelines; for 106 patients, less than 50% of all ultrasounds were performed every 6 months and 110 patients showed an interval greater than one year. Patients from the private sector received ultrasound screenings near the ideal in 28.9% of cases, while patients from the University Hospital received ultrasounds in only 8.4% of cases (p<0.0001). HCC was diagnosed in 30 patients (11.8%). For these 30 patients, 11 screenings were properly performed within 6 months (36.6%) and only 1 out of the 11 (9%) met the criteria for transplant. In the remaining 19 patients who did not receive the screening within 6 months, 6 (31.5%) did not meet the criteria for transplant. CONCLUSION: HCC screening in our environment was irregularly performed, mainly in the public service setting, which prevented early diagnosis in a large number of patients.
topic Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Mass Screening
Diagnosis
Liver Cirrhosis
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322016000700361&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT izabelleventurinisignorelli socioeconomicdisparitiesinaccesstoahepatocellularcarcinomascreeningprograminbrazil
AT patricialofegogoncalves socioeconomicdisparitiesinaccesstoahepatocellularcarcinomascreeningprograminbrazil
AT lucianalofegogoncalves socioeconomicdisparitiesinaccesstoahepatocellularcarcinomascreeningprograminbrazil
AT luizsergioemeryferreira socioeconomicdisparitiesinaccesstoahepatocellularcarcinomascreeningprograminbrazil
AT anaterezaparpaiolamendonca socioeconomicdisparitiesinaccesstoahepatocellularcarcinomascreeningprograminbrazil
AT gustavoleitefranklin socioeconomicdisparitiesinaccesstoahepatocellularcarcinomascreeningprograminbrazil
AT mariadapenhazagogomes socioeconomicdisparitiesinaccesstoahepatocellularcarcinomascreeningprograminbrazil
_version_ 1725418455672291328