The pluripotent history of immunology. A review

The historiography of immunology since 1999 is reviewed, in part as a response to claims by historians such as Thomas Söderqvist the field was still immature at the time (Söderqvist & Stillwell 1999). First addressed are the difficulties, past and present, surrounding the disciplinary definition...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Neeraja Sankaran
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centre for Philosophical Research 2012-09-01
Series:Avant: Journal of Philosophical-Interdisciplinary Vanguard
Subjects:
Online Access:http://avant.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/NSankaran-The-pluripotent-_Avant_12012_online.doc.pdf
id doaj-601311e6002746eab6fde9af57a8b6ca
record_format Article
spelling doaj-601311e6002746eab6fde9af57a8b6ca2020-11-24T20:48:07ZengCentre for Philosophical ResearchAvant: Journal of Philosophical-Interdisciplinary Vanguard2082-75982082-67102012-09-0131/20123754The pluripotent history of immunology. A reviewNeeraja SankaranThe historiography of immunology since 1999 is reviewed, in part as a response to claims by historians such as Thomas Söderqvist the field was still immature at the time (Söderqvist & Stillwell 1999). First addressed are the difficulties, past and present, surrounding the disciplinary definition of immunology, which is followed by a commentary on the recent scholarship devoted to the concept of the immune self. The new literature on broad immunological topics is examined and assessed, and specific charges leveled against the paucity of certain types of histories, e.g. biographical and institutional histories, are evaluated. In conclusion, there are compelling indications that the history of immunology has moved past the initial tentative stages identified in the earlier reviews to become a bustling, pluripotent discipline, much like the subject of its scrutiny, and that it continues to develop in many new and exciting directions.http://avant.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/NSankaran-The-pluripotent-_Avant_12012_online.doc.pdfBiographical historyContinuity modelDanger ModelHistoriography of ImmunologyHistory of ImmunologyInstitutional historySelf vs. Non-self model
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Neeraja Sankaran
spellingShingle Neeraja Sankaran
The pluripotent history of immunology. A review
Avant: Journal of Philosophical-Interdisciplinary Vanguard
Biographical history
Continuity model
Danger Model
Historiography of Immunology
History of Immunology
Institutional history
Self vs. Non-self model
author_facet Neeraja Sankaran
author_sort Neeraja Sankaran
title The pluripotent history of immunology. A review
title_short The pluripotent history of immunology. A review
title_full The pluripotent history of immunology. A review
title_fullStr The pluripotent history of immunology. A review
title_full_unstemmed The pluripotent history of immunology. A review
title_sort pluripotent history of immunology. a review
publisher Centre for Philosophical Research
series Avant: Journal of Philosophical-Interdisciplinary Vanguard
issn 2082-7598
2082-6710
publishDate 2012-09-01
description The historiography of immunology since 1999 is reviewed, in part as a response to claims by historians such as Thomas Söderqvist the field was still immature at the time (Söderqvist & Stillwell 1999). First addressed are the difficulties, past and present, surrounding the disciplinary definition of immunology, which is followed by a commentary on the recent scholarship devoted to the concept of the immune self. The new literature on broad immunological topics is examined and assessed, and specific charges leveled against the paucity of certain types of histories, e.g. biographical and institutional histories, are evaluated. In conclusion, there are compelling indications that the history of immunology has moved past the initial tentative stages identified in the earlier reviews to become a bustling, pluripotent discipline, much like the subject of its scrutiny, and that it continues to develop in many new and exciting directions.
topic Biographical history
Continuity model
Danger Model
Historiography of Immunology
History of Immunology
Institutional history
Self vs. Non-self model
url http://avant.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/NSankaran-The-pluripotent-_Avant_12012_online.doc.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT neerajasankaran thepluripotenthistoryofimmunologyareview
AT neerajasankaran pluripotenthistoryofimmunologyareview
_version_ 1716808904416952320