The paradoxical marketing of sports equipment brands. [El marketing paradójico de las marcas de material deportivo].

<p align="justify">As Ko (2013) pointed out, the sport industry is a large and fast growing business. The U.S. market accounted for as much as $400-435 billion in 2012. Sports equipment companies provide the products required to practice and enjoy sports: clothing, footwear, and othe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: José A. Martínez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ramón Cantó Alcaraz 2014-01-01
Series:Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.cafyd.com/REVISTA/editorial35.pdf
id doaj-65057b8695a5458f87cf11fa21f4deff
record_format Article
spelling doaj-65057b8695a5458f87cf11fa21f4deff2020-11-24T21:03:49ZengRamón Cantó AlcarazRevista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte1885-31372014-01-0110351310.5232/ricyde2014.035The paradoxical marketing of sports equipment brands. [El marketing paradójico de las marcas de material deportivo].José A. Martínez0Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena; España<p align="justify">As Ko (2013) pointed out, the sport industry is a large and fast growing business. The U.S. market accounted for as much as $400-435 billion in 2012. Sports equipment companies provide the products required to practice and enjoy sports: clothing, footwear, and other apparel and gear. Therefore, sports equipment brands surround all the aspects shaping the sports industry. In addition, they extend their arms to also embrace the fashion market. A few equipment brands, such as Nike and Adidas are listed among the most powerful brands in the world (Badenhausen, 2012). Data about some giant brands of this industry reflect the relevance of this business. For example, Nike global sales were to $21 billion in 2011, (Cendrowski, 2012); Under Armour spent $205.4 million on marketing in 2012 (Lambert, 2013) and Nike $2.4 billion in 2011 (Cendrowski, 2012); The football teams Real Madrid and Barcelona get an average of $49 million a year from Adidas and $43 million from Nike, respectively (Ozanian, 2012); and Adidas paid $130 million to become the official sportswear provider of London 2012 summer Olympics (Anderson, 2013).</p>http://www.cafyd.com/REVISTA/editorial35.pdfmarketing of sportsequipment brandsmarcasmaterial deportivo
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author José A. Martínez
spellingShingle José A. Martínez
The paradoxical marketing of sports equipment brands. [El marketing paradójico de las marcas de material deportivo].
Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte
marketing of sports
equipment brands
marcas
material deportivo
author_facet José A. Martínez
author_sort José A. Martínez
title The paradoxical marketing of sports equipment brands. [El marketing paradójico de las marcas de material deportivo].
title_short The paradoxical marketing of sports equipment brands. [El marketing paradójico de las marcas de material deportivo].
title_full The paradoxical marketing of sports equipment brands. [El marketing paradójico de las marcas de material deportivo].
title_fullStr The paradoxical marketing of sports equipment brands. [El marketing paradójico de las marcas de material deportivo].
title_full_unstemmed The paradoxical marketing of sports equipment brands. [El marketing paradójico de las marcas de material deportivo].
title_sort paradoxical marketing of sports equipment brands. [el marketing paradójico de las marcas de material deportivo].
publisher Ramón Cantó Alcaraz
series Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte
issn 1885-3137
publishDate 2014-01-01
description <p align="justify">As Ko (2013) pointed out, the sport industry is a large and fast growing business. The U.S. market accounted for as much as $400-435 billion in 2012. Sports equipment companies provide the products required to practice and enjoy sports: clothing, footwear, and other apparel and gear. Therefore, sports equipment brands surround all the aspects shaping the sports industry. In addition, they extend their arms to also embrace the fashion market. A few equipment brands, such as Nike and Adidas are listed among the most powerful brands in the world (Badenhausen, 2012). Data about some giant brands of this industry reflect the relevance of this business. For example, Nike global sales were to $21 billion in 2011, (Cendrowski, 2012); Under Armour spent $205.4 million on marketing in 2012 (Lambert, 2013) and Nike $2.4 billion in 2011 (Cendrowski, 2012); The football teams Real Madrid and Barcelona get an average of $49 million a year from Adidas and $43 million from Nike, respectively (Ozanian, 2012); and Adidas paid $130 million to become the official sportswear provider of London 2012 summer Olympics (Anderson, 2013).</p>
topic marketing of sports
equipment brands
marcas
material deportivo
url http://www.cafyd.com/REVISTA/editorial35.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT joseamartinez theparadoxicalmarketingofsportsequipmentbrandselmarketingparadojicodelasmarcasdematerialdeportivo
AT joseamartinez paradoxicalmarketingofsportsequipmentbrandselmarketingparadojicodelasmarcasdematerialdeportivo
_version_ 1716772886094544896