VALUE OF PREOPERATIVE CLINICAL-RADIOLOGICAL-PATHOLOGICAL EVALUATION

Background. Proper communication between clinician, pathologist and radiologist may improve both the desired patient outcome and physicians’ job satisfaction. It is common practice for physicians to communicate via written findings and requisition forms without discussing patient’s findings in perso...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Boris Pospihalj, Sašo Rainer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Slovenian Medical Association 2002-01-01
Series:Zdravniški Vestnik
Subjects:
Online Access:http://vestnik.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/1557
id doaj-667b2a97c5f94457ba2dcaa06399295c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-667b2a97c5f94457ba2dcaa06399295c2020-11-24T22:23:06ZengSlovenian Medical AssociationZdravniški Vestnik1318-03471581-02242002-01-017111097VALUE OF PREOPERATIVE CLINICAL-RADIOLOGICAL-PATHOLOGICAL EVALUATIONBoris Pospihalj0Sašo Rainer1Oddelek za patomorfologijo in citologijo Splošna bolnišnica Gosposvetska cesta 1 2380 Slovenj GradecRadiološki oddelek Splošna bolnišnica Gosposvetska cesta 1 2380 Slovenj GradecBackground. Proper communication between clinician, pathologist and radiologist may improve both the desired patient outcome and physicians’ job satisfaction. It is common practice for physicians to communicate via written findings and requisition forms without discussing patient’s findings in person as a team. In some circumstances such an approach may retain important diagnostic and therapeutic problems and, finally, serious deterioration of expected patient’s outcome may emerge. It is reasonable to believe that many diagnostic and therapeutic problems will be elucidated during consultation process owing to the fact that patient’s medical history, symptoms, and findings are shared between physicians of different specialities. In order to avoid possible errors in diagnostic procedure this communication should be carried out before implementing the treatment plan.<br />Conclusions. Three instructive cases are presented: in two of them such communication might have been beneficial, resulting in correct diagnosis and proper treatment; in the third case, however, preoperative consultation fruitfully yielded accurate diagnosis.<br /><br />http://vestnik.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/1557preoperative evaluationclinical-pathological communication
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Boris Pospihalj
Sašo Rainer
spellingShingle Boris Pospihalj
Sašo Rainer
VALUE OF PREOPERATIVE CLINICAL-RADIOLOGICAL-PATHOLOGICAL EVALUATION
Zdravniški Vestnik
preoperative evaluation
clinical-pathological communication
author_facet Boris Pospihalj
Sašo Rainer
author_sort Boris Pospihalj
title VALUE OF PREOPERATIVE CLINICAL-RADIOLOGICAL-PATHOLOGICAL EVALUATION
title_short VALUE OF PREOPERATIVE CLINICAL-RADIOLOGICAL-PATHOLOGICAL EVALUATION
title_full VALUE OF PREOPERATIVE CLINICAL-RADIOLOGICAL-PATHOLOGICAL EVALUATION
title_fullStr VALUE OF PREOPERATIVE CLINICAL-RADIOLOGICAL-PATHOLOGICAL EVALUATION
title_full_unstemmed VALUE OF PREOPERATIVE CLINICAL-RADIOLOGICAL-PATHOLOGICAL EVALUATION
title_sort value of preoperative clinical-radiological-pathological evaluation
publisher Slovenian Medical Association
series Zdravniški Vestnik
issn 1318-0347
1581-0224
publishDate 2002-01-01
description Background. Proper communication between clinician, pathologist and radiologist may improve both the desired patient outcome and physicians’ job satisfaction. It is common practice for physicians to communicate via written findings and requisition forms without discussing patient’s findings in person as a team. In some circumstances such an approach may retain important diagnostic and therapeutic problems and, finally, serious deterioration of expected patient’s outcome may emerge. It is reasonable to believe that many diagnostic and therapeutic problems will be elucidated during consultation process owing to the fact that patient’s medical history, symptoms, and findings are shared between physicians of different specialities. In order to avoid possible errors in diagnostic procedure this communication should be carried out before implementing the treatment plan.<br />Conclusions. Three instructive cases are presented: in two of them such communication might have been beneficial, resulting in correct diagnosis and proper treatment; in the third case, however, preoperative consultation fruitfully yielded accurate diagnosis.<br /><br />
topic preoperative evaluation
clinical-pathological communication
url http://vestnik.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/1557
work_keys_str_mv AT borispospihalj valueofpreoperativeclinicalradiologicalpathologicalevaluation
AT sasorainer valueofpreoperativeclinicalradiologicalpathologicalevaluation
_version_ 1725765976501256192