Reforming Wildlife Law: The Law Commission Proposals for Wildlife Law and Wildlife Sanctions

<p>This article critically examines a an ongoing review commenced in 2012 by the United Kingdom’s Law Commission into new wildlife laws for England and Wales by considering four interlinked elements of the process. First, it outlines the underlying subject matter and regulatory aims of wildlif...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Keith Vincent
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Queensland University of Technology 2014-08-01
Series:International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.crimejusticejournal.com/article/view/175
id doaj-6c37bd41bc2547d89643317d09524bf4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6c37bd41bc2547d89643317d09524bf42021-06-02T07:03:57ZengQueensland University of TechnologyInternational Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy2202-79982202-80052014-08-0132678010.5204/ijcjsd.v3i2.175141Reforming Wildlife Law: The Law Commission Proposals for Wildlife Law and Wildlife SanctionsKeith Vincent0Law Commission<p>This article critically examines a an ongoing review commenced in 2012 by the United Kingdom’s Law Commission into new wildlife laws for England and Wales by considering four interlinked elements of the process. First, it outlines the underlying subject matter and regulatory aims of wildlife law.  It then describes the scope of the Law Commission’s Wildlife Law Project, identifying some of the key problem areas it sought to address and referencing its consultation process conducted in the later part of 2012. Next the article summarises the Law Commission’s view for a new wildlife law regime. The fourth element explores the current and potential roles of criminalising and non-criminalising sanctions. With a continued focus on the underlying subject matter and regulatory aims, discussion centres on the greater use of non-criminalising civil sanctions in wildlife law. The paper supports the Law Commission’s argument that the creation of a civil sanctions regime is not tantamount to decriminalisation in its true sense but simply widens the available regulatory enforcement options.</p>https://www.crimejusticejournal.com/article/view/175Wildlifeenvironmentcivil sanctiondecriminalisationlaw reform.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Keith Vincent
spellingShingle Keith Vincent
Reforming Wildlife Law: The Law Commission Proposals for Wildlife Law and Wildlife Sanctions
International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy
Wildlife
environment
civil sanction
decriminalisation
law reform.
author_facet Keith Vincent
author_sort Keith Vincent
title Reforming Wildlife Law: The Law Commission Proposals for Wildlife Law and Wildlife Sanctions
title_short Reforming Wildlife Law: The Law Commission Proposals for Wildlife Law and Wildlife Sanctions
title_full Reforming Wildlife Law: The Law Commission Proposals for Wildlife Law and Wildlife Sanctions
title_fullStr Reforming Wildlife Law: The Law Commission Proposals for Wildlife Law and Wildlife Sanctions
title_full_unstemmed Reforming Wildlife Law: The Law Commission Proposals for Wildlife Law and Wildlife Sanctions
title_sort reforming wildlife law: the law commission proposals for wildlife law and wildlife sanctions
publisher Queensland University of Technology
series International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy
issn 2202-7998
2202-8005
publishDate 2014-08-01
description <p>This article critically examines a an ongoing review commenced in 2012 by the United Kingdom’s Law Commission into new wildlife laws for England and Wales by considering four interlinked elements of the process. First, it outlines the underlying subject matter and regulatory aims of wildlife law.  It then describes the scope of the Law Commission’s Wildlife Law Project, identifying some of the key problem areas it sought to address and referencing its consultation process conducted in the later part of 2012. Next the article summarises the Law Commission’s view for a new wildlife law regime. The fourth element explores the current and potential roles of criminalising and non-criminalising sanctions. With a continued focus on the underlying subject matter and regulatory aims, discussion centres on the greater use of non-criminalising civil sanctions in wildlife law. The paper supports the Law Commission’s argument that the creation of a civil sanctions regime is not tantamount to decriminalisation in its true sense but simply widens the available regulatory enforcement options.</p>
topic Wildlife
environment
civil sanction
decriminalisation
law reform.
url https://www.crimejusticejournal.com/article/view/175
work_keys_str_mv AT keithvincent reformingwildlifelawthelawcommissionproposalsforwildlifelawandwildlifesanctions
_version_ 1721407482775994368