Detection of bacteria with molecular methods in prosthetic joint infection: sonication fluid better than periprosthetic tissue
Background and purpose — The correct diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) can be difficult because bacteria form a biofilm on the surface of the implant. The sensitivity of culture from sonication fluid is better than that from periprosthetic tissue, but no comparison studies using molecula...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2016-07-01
|
Series: | Acta Orthopaedica |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2016.1165558 |
id |
doaj-6ec2dc24ecb641528a4115ca176af8a2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6ec2dc24ecb641528a4115ca176af8a22021-02-02T05:31:41ZengTaylor & Francis GroupActa Orthopaedica1745-36741745-36822016-07-0187433934510.3109/17453674.2016.11655581165558Detection of bacteria with molecular methods in prosthetic joint infection: sonication fluid better than periprosthetic tissueMitja Rak0Martina KavčIč1Rihard Trebše2Andrej CőR3University of PrimorskaEnvironment and FoodValdoltra Orthopaedic HospitalUniversity of PrimorskaBackground and purpose — The correct diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) can be difficult because bacteria form a biofilm on the surface of the implant. The sensitivity of culture from sonication fluid is better than that from periprosthetic tissue, but no comparison studies using molecular methods on a large scale have been performed. We assessed whether periprosthetic tissue or sonication fluid should be used for molecular analysis. Patients and methods — Implant and tissue samples were retrieved from 87 patients who underwent revision operation of total knee or total hip arthroplasty. Both sample types were analyzed using broad-range (BR-) PCR targeting the 16S rRNA gene. The results were evaluated based on the definition of periprosthetic joint infection from the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Results — PJI was diagnosed in 29 patients, whereas aseptic failure was diagnosed in 58 patients. Analysis of sonication fluid using BR-PCR detected bacteria in 27 patients, whereas analysis of periprosthetic tissue by BR-PCR detected bacteria in 22 patients. In 6 of 7 patients in whom BR-PCR analysis of periprosthetic tissue was negative, low-virulence bacteria were present. The sensitivity and specificity values for periprosthetic tissue were 76% and 93%, respectively, and the sensitivity and specificity values for sonication fluid were 95% and 97%. Interpretation — Our results suggest that sonication fluid may be a more appropriate sample than periprosthetic tissue for BR-PCR analysis in patients with PJI. However, further investigation is required to improve detection of bacteria in patients with so-called aseptic failure.http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2016.1165558 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mitja Rak Martina KavčIč Rihard Trebše Andrej CőR |
spellingShingle |
Mitja Rak Martina KavčIč Rihard Trebše Andrej CőR Detection of bacteria with molecular methods in prosthetic joint infection: sonication fluid better than periprosthetic tissue Acta Orthopaedica |
author_facet |
Mitja Rak Martina KavčIč Rihard Trebše Andrej CőR |
author_sort |
Mitja Rak |
title |
Detection of bacteria with molecular methods in prosthetic joint infection: sonication fluid better than periprosthetic tissue |
title_short |
Detection of bacteria with molecular methods in prosthetic joint infection: sonication fluid better than periprosthetic tissue |
title_full |
Detection of bacteria with molecular methods in prosthetic joint infection: sonication fluid better than periprosthetic tissue |
title_fullStr |
Detection of bacteria with molecular methods in prosthetic joint infection: sonication fluid better than periprosthetic tissue |
title_full_unstemmed |
Detection of bacteria with molecular methods in prosthetic joint infection: sonication fluid better than periprosthetic tissue |
title_sort |
detection of bacteria with molecular methods in prosthetic joint infection: sonication fluid better than periprosthetic tissue |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis Group |
series |
Acta Orthopaedica |
issn |
1745-3674 1745-3682 |
publishDate |
2016-07-01 |
description |
Background and purpose — The correct diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) can be difficult because bacteria form a biofilm on the surface of the implant. The sensitivity of culture from sonication fluid is better than that from periprosthetic tissue, but no comparison studies using molecular methods on a large scale have been performed. We assessed whether periprosthetic tissue or sonication fluid should be used for molecular analysis. Patients and methods — Implant and tissue samples were retrieved from 87 patients who underwent revision operation of total knee or total hip arthroplasty. Both sample types were analyzed using broad-range (BR-) PCR targeting the 16S rRNA gene. The results were evaluated based on the definition of periprosthetic joint infection from the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Results — PJI was diagnosed in 29 patients, whereas aseptic failure was diagnosed in 58 patients. Analysis of sonication fluid using BR-PCR detected bacteria in 27 patients, whereas analysis of periprosthetic tissue by BR-PCR detected bacteria in 22 patients. In 6 of 7 patients in whom BR-PCR analysis of periprosthetic tissue was negative, low-virulence bacteria were present. The sensitivity and specificity values for periprosthetic tissue were 76% and 93%, respectively, and the sensitivity and specificity values for sonication fluid were 95% and 97%. Interpretation — Our results suggest that sonication fluid may be a more appropriate sample than periprosthetic tissue for BR-PCR analysis in patients with PJI. However, further investigation is required to improve detection of bacteria in patients with so-called aseptic failure. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2016.1165558 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mitjarak detectionofbacteriawithmolecularmethodsinprostheticjointinfectionsonicationfluidbetterthanperiprosthetictissue AT martinakavcic detectionofbacteriawithmolecularmethodsinprostheticjointinfectionsonicationfluidbetterthanperiprosthetictissue AT rihardtrebse detectionofbacteriawithmolecularmethodsinprostheticjointinfectionsonicationfluidbetterthanperiprosthetictissue AT andrejcor detectionofbacteriawithmolecularmethodsinprostheticjointinfectionsonicationfluidbetterthanperiprosthetictissue |
_version_ |
1724303482026983424 |