Changes in Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Treatment Patterns over Time: A Population-Based Study in a Country with Universal and Centralized Healthcare

Background. The clinical care of soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) patients is largely multidisciplinary involving clinicians from surgical disciplines, medical oncology, and radiation oncology. It is not clear if treatment patterns for STS have changed over time. We present population-level data on changes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anthony Bozzo, Hsien Seow, Gregory Pond, Michelle Ghert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2019-01-01
Series:Sarcoma
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8409406
id doaj-6ee09c6c8779411d99a97fbb946b8651
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6ee09c6c8779411d99a97fbb946b86512020-11-25T02:33:36ZengHindawi LimitedSarcoma1357-714X1369-16432019-01-01201910.1155/2019/84094068409406Changes in Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Treatment Patterns over Time: A Population-Based Study in a Country with Universal and Centralized HealthcareAnthony Bozzo0Hsien Seow1Gregory Pond2Michelle Ghert3Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, CanadaInstitute for Clinical and Evaluative Science (ICES), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, CanadaDepartment of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, CanadaDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, CanadaBackground. The clinical care of soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) patients is largely multidisciplinary involving clinicians from surgical disciplines, medical oncology, and radiation oncology. It is not clear if treatment patterns for STS have changed over time. We present population-level data on changes in treatment patterns of patients diagnosed with STS of all stages in Ontario, Canada. Methods. We performed a population-based cohort study using linked administrative databases in Ontario, Canada, of patients with STS between 2006 and 2015. Patients with the AJCC stage at the time of diagnosis were included. Patients were categorized into one of the seven treatment arms: single modality treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation therapy), bimodality therapy, or all three treatment modalities. Survival of STS patients of different stages is displayed with the Kaplan–Meier method. Results. A total of 4696 patients were diagnosed with biopsy-proven sarcoma during the study period including 1915 patients with stage information available. Treatment patterns for patients with Stage 1 and 2 disease were similar enough to allow for grouping. The use of radiation therapy in Stage 1 and 2 patients increased by 15% over the study period. None of the 7 treatment regimens for Stage 3 patients changed appreciably during the study period. We observed that the use of chemotherapy for Stage 4 STS patients increased 36% during the study period. Overall patient survival was, as expected, highest in Stage 1 patients and lowest in Stage 4 patients. Conclusion. This is the first population-level study reporting of 7 different STS treatment regimens in a country with universal and centralized healthcare. Radiation therapy for local disease control and chemotherapy for Stage 4 patients have recently become more utilized. Survival from STS is highly dependent on stage at presentation. Other population-based studies from other countries are needed to establish the current international treatment patterns.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8409406
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anthony Bozzo
Hsien Seow
Gregory Pond
Michelle Ghert
spellingShingle Anthony Bozzo
Hsien Seow
Gregory Pond
Michelle Ghert
Changes in Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Treatment Patterns over Time: A Population-Based Study in a Country with Universal and Centralized Healthcare
Sarcoma
author_facet Anthony Bozzo
Hsien Seow
Gregory Pond
Michelle Ghert
author_sort Anthony Bozzo
title Changes in Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Treatment Patterns over Time: A Population-Based Study in a Country with Universal and Centralized Healthcare
title_short Changes in Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Treatment Patterns over Time: A Population-Based Study in a Country with Universal and Centralized Healthcare
title_full Changes in Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Treatment Patterns over Time: A Population-Based Study in a Country with Universal and Centralized Healthcare
title_fullStr Changes in Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Treatment Patterns over Time: A Population-Based Study in a Country with Universal and Centralized Healthcare
title_full_unstemmed Changes in Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Treatment Patterns over Time: A Population-Based Study in a Country with Universal and Centralized Healthcare
title_sort changes in soft-tissue sarcoma treatment patterns over time: a population-based study in a country with universal and centralized healthcare
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Sarcoma
issn 1357-714X
1369-1643
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Background. The clinical care of soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) patients is largely multidisciplinary involving clinicians from surgical disciplines, medical oncology, and radiation oncology. It is not clear if treatment patterns for STS have changed over time. We present population-level data on changes in treatment patterns of patients diagnosed with STS of all stages in Ontario, Canada. Methods. We performed a population-based cohort study using linked administrative databases in Ontario, Canada, of patients with STS between 2006 and 2015. Patients with the AJCC stage at the time of diagnosis were included. Patients were categorized into one of the seven treatment arms: single modality treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation therapy), bimodality therapy, or all three treatment modalities. Survival of STS patients of different stages is displayed with the Kaplan–Meier method. Results. A total of 4696 patients were diagnosed with biopsy-proven sarcoma during the study period including 1915 patients with stage information available. Treatment patterns for patients with Stage 1 and 2 disease were similar enough to allow for grouping. The use of radiation therapy in Stage 1 and 2 patients increased by 15% over the study period. None of the 7 treatment regimens for Stage 3 patients changed appreciably during the study period. We observed that the use of chemotherapy for Stage 4 STS patients increased 36% during the study period. Overall patient survival was, as expected, highest in Stage 1 patients and lowest in Stage 4 patients. Conclusion. This is the first population-level study reporting of 7 different STS treatment regimens in a country with universal and centralized healthcare. Radiation therapy for local disease control and chemotherapy for Stage 4 patients have recently become more utilized. Survival from STS is highly dependent on stage at presentation. Other population-based studies from other countries are needed to establish the current international treatment patterns.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8409406
work_keys_str_mv AT anthonybozzo changesinsofttissuesarcomatreatmentpatternsovertimeapopulationbasedstudyinacountrywithuniversalandcentralizedhealthcare
AT hsienseow changesinsofttissuesarcomatreatmentpatternsovertimeapopulationbasedstudyinacountrywithuniversalandcentralizedhealthcare
AT gregorypond changesinsofttissuesarcomatreatmentpatternsovertimeapopulationbasedstudyinacountrywithuniversalandcentralizedhealthcare
AT michelleghert changesinsofttissuesarcomatreatmentpatternsovertimeapopulationbasedstudyinacountrywithuniversalandcentralizedhealthcare
_version_ 1724812865337032704