Development and psychometric testing of an abridged version of Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM)
Abstract Background Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM) is a 50-item tool to assess the educational environment of medical institutions as perceived by the students. This cross-sectional study developed and validated an abridged version of the DREEM-50 with an aim to have a less res...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-04-01
|
Series: | Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12199-018-0702-7 |
id |
doaj-6f5b49c0f9ce445db583fb0b28c29437 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6f5b49c0f9ce445db583fb0b28c294372020-11-24T23:49:12ZengBMCEnvironmental Health and Preventive Medicine1342-078X1347-47152018-04-012311610.1186/s12199-018-0702-7Development and psychometric testing of an abridged version of Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM)Kathiresan Jeyashree0Hemant Deepak Shewade1Soundappan Kathirvel2Department of Community Medicine, Velammal Medical College Hospital and Research InstituteDepartment of Operational Research, International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union), South-East Asia Office, C-6 Qutub Institutional AreaDepartment of Community Medicine, School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER)Abstract Background Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM) is a 50-item tool to assess the educational environment of medical institutions as perceived by the students. This cross-sectional study developed and validated an abridged version of the DREEM-50 with an aim to have a less resource-intensive (time, manpower), yet valid and reliable, version of DREEM-50 while also avoiding respondent fatigue. Methods A methodology similar to that used in the development of WHO-BREF was adopted to develop the abridged version of DREEM. Medical students (n = 418) from a private teaching hospital in Madurai, India, were divided into two groups. Group I (n = 277) participated in the development of the abridged version. This was performed by domain-wise selection of items that had the highest item-total correlation. Group II (n = 141) participated in the testing of the abridged version for construct validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to assess the construct validity of DREEM-12. Results The abridged version had 12 items (DREEM-12) spread over all five domains in DREEM-50. DREEM-12 explained 77.4% of the variance in DREEM-50 scores. Correlation between total scores of DREEM-50 and DREEM-12 was 0.88 (p < 0.001). Confirmatory factor analysis of DREEM-12 construct was statistically significant (LR test of model vs. saturated p = 0.0006). The internal consistency of DREEM-12 was 0.83. The test-retest reliability of DREEM-12 was 0.595, p < 0.001. Conclusion DREEM-12 is a valid and reliable tool for use in educational research. Future research using DREEM-12 will establish its validity and reliability across different settings.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12199-018-0702-7DREEMAbridged versionPsychometric testingConfirmatory factor analysisEducational environment |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kathiresan Jeyashree Hemant Deepak Shewade Soundappan Kathirvel |
spellingShingle |
Kathiresan Jeyashree Hemant Deepak Shewade Soundappan Kathirvel Development and psychometric testing of an abridged version of Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM) Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine DREEM Abridged version Psychometric testing Confirmatory factor analysis Educational environment |
author_facet |
Kathiresan Jeyashree Hemant Deepak Shewade Soundappan Kathirvel |
author_sort |
Kathiresan Jeyashree |
title |
Development and psychometric testing of an abridged version of Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM) |
title_short |
Development and psychometric testing of an abridged version of Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM) |
title_full |
Development and psychometric testing of an abridged version of Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM) |
title_fullStr |
Development and psychometric testing of an abridged version of Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Development and psychometric testing of an abridged version of Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM) |
title_sort |
development and psychometric testing of an abridged version of dundee ready educational environment measure (dreem) |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine |
issn |
1342-078X 1347-4715 |
publishDate |
2018-04-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM) is a 50-item tool to assess the educational environment of medical institutions as perceived by the students. This cross-sectional study developed and validated an abridged version of the DREEM-50 with an aim to have a less resource-intensive (time, manpower), yet valid and reliable, version of DREEM-50 while also avoiding respondent fatigue. Methods A methodology similar to that used in the development of WHO-BREF was adopted to develop the abridged version of DREEM. Medical students (n = 418) from a private teaching hospital in Madurai, India, were divided into two groups. Group I (n = 277) participated in the development of the abridged version. This was performed by domain-wise selection of items that had the highest item-total correlation. Group II (n = 141) participated in the testing of the abridged version for construct validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to assess the construct validity of DREEM-12. Results The abridged version had 12 items (DREEM-12) spread over all five domains in DREEM-50. DREEM-12 explained 77.4% of the variance in DREEM-50 scores. Correlation between total scores of DREEM-50 and DREEM-12 was 0.88 (p < 0.001). Confirmatory factor analysis of DREEM-12 construct was statistically significant (LR test of model vs. saturated p = 0.0006). The internal consistency of DREEM-12 was 0.83. The test-retest reliability of DREEM-12 was 0.595, p < 0.001. Conclusion DREEM-12 is a valid and reliable tool for use in educational research. Future research using DREEM-12 will establish its validity and reliability across different settings. |
topic |
DREEM Abridged version Psychometric testing Confirmatory factor analysis Educational environment |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12199-018-0702-7 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kathiresanjeyashree developmentandpsychometrictestingofanabridgedversionofdundeereadyeducationalenvironmentmeasuredreem AT hemantdeepakshewade developmentandpsychometrictestingofanabridgedversionofdundeereadyeducationalenvironmentmeasuredreem AT soundappankathirvel developmentandpsychometrictestingofanabridgedversionofdundeereadyeducationalenvironmentmeasuredreem |
_version_ |
1725483378412617728 |