Predictive Role of MRI and <sup>18</sup>F FDG PET Response to Concurrent Chemoradiation in T2b Cervical Cancer on Clinical Outcome: A Retrospective Single Center Study

Tumor response in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) is generally evaluated with MRI and PET, but this strategy is not supported by the literature. Therefore, we compared the diagnostic performance of these two techniques in the response evaluation to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in LACC...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna Myriam Perrone, Giulia Dondi, Manuela Coe, Martina Ferioli, Silvi Telo, Andrea Galuppi, Eugenia De Crescenzo, Marco Tesei, Paolo Castellucci, Cristina Nanni, Stefano Fanti, Alessio G. Morganti, Pierandrea De Iaco
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-03-01
Series:Cancers
Subjects:
mri
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/3/659
id doaj-7071a45e79e840f292ea36c34c53b1a1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7071a45e79e840f292ea36c34c53b1a12020-11-25T02:25:13ZengMDPI AGCancers2072-66942020-03-0112365910.3390/cancers12030659cancers12030659Predictive Role of MRI and <sup>18</sup>F FDG PET Response to Concurrent Chemoradiation in T2b Cervical Cancer on Clinical Outcome: A Retrospective Single Center StudyAnna Myriam Perrone0Giulia Dondi1Manuela Coe2Martina Ferioli3Silvi Telo4Andrea Galuppi5Eugenia De Crescenzo6Marco Tesei7Paolo Castellucci8Cristina Nanni9Stefano Fanti10Alessio G. Morganti11Pierandrea De Iaco12Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Sant’Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, ItalyGynecologic Oncology Unit, Sant’Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, ItalyDepartment of Specialized, Diagnostic, and Experimental Medicine, Sant’Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, ItalyRadiotherapy Unit, Sant’Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, ItalyNuclear Medicine Unit, Sant’Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, ItalyCentro di Studio e Ricerca delle Neoplasie Ginecologiche (CSR) University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, ItalyGynecologic Oncology Unit, Sant’Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, ItalyGynecologic Oncology Unit, Sant’Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, ItalyNuclear Medicine Unit, Sant’Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, ItalyNuclear Medicine Unit, Sant’Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, ItalyCentro di Studio e Ricerca delle Neoplasie Ginecologiche (CSR) University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, ItalyCentro di Studio e Ricerca delle Neoplasie Ginecologiche (CSR) University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, ItalyGynecologic Oncology Unit, Sant’Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, ItalyTumor response in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) is generally evaluated with MRI and PET, but this strategy is not supported by the literature. Therefore, we compared the diagnostic performance of these two techniques in the response evaluation to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in LACC. Patients with cervical cancer (CC) stage T2b treated with CCRT and submitted to MRI and PET/CT before and after treatment were enrolled in the study. All clinical, pathological, therapeutic, radiologic and follow-up data were collected and examined. The radiological response was analyzed and compared to the follow-up data. Data of 40 patients with LACC were analyzed. Agreement between MRI and PET/CT in the evaluation response to therapy was observed in 31/40 (77.5%) of cases. The agreement between MRI, PET/CT and follow-up data showed a Cohen kappa coefficient of 0.59 (95% CI = 0.267&#8722;0.913) and of 0.84 (95% CI = 0.636&#8722;1.00), respectively. Considering the evaluation of primary tumor response, PET/CT was correct in 97.5% of cases, and MRI in 92.5% of cases; no false negative cases were observed. These results suggest the use of PET/CT as a unique diagnostic imaging tool after CCRT, to correctly assess residual and progression disease.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/3/659locally advanced cervical cancerpet/ctmriconcurrent chemoradiotherapytreatment responsefollow up
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anna Myriam Perrone
Giulia Dondi
Manuela Coe
Martina Ferioli
Silvi Telo
Andrea Galuppi
Eugenia De Crescenzo
Marco Tesei
Paolo Castellucci
Cristina Nanni
Stefano Fanti
Alessio G. Morganti
Pierandrea De Iaco
spellingShingle Anna Myriam Perrone
Giulia Dondi
Manuela Coe
Martina Ferioli
Silvi Telo
Andrea Galuppi
Eugenia De Crescenzo
Marco Tesei
Paolo Castellucci
Cristina Nanni
Stefano Fanti
Alessio G. Morganti
Pierandrea De Iaco
Predictive Role of MRI and <sup>18</sup>F FDG PET Response to Concurrent Chemoradiation in T2b Cervical Cancer on Clinical Outcome: A Retrospective Single Center Study
Cancers
locally advanced cervical cancer
pet/ct
mri
concurrent chemoradiotherapy
treatment response
follow up
author_facet Anna Myriam Perrone
Giulia Dondi
Manuela Coe
Martina Ferioli
Silvi Telo
Andrea Galuppi
Eugenia De Crescenzo
Marco Tesei
Paolo Castellucci
Cristina Nanni
Stefano Fanti
Alessio G. Morganti
Pierandrea De Iaco
author_sort Anna Myriam Perrone
title Predictive Role of MRI and <sup>18</sup>F FDG PET Response to Concurrent Chemoradiation in T2b Cervical Cancer on Clinical Outcome: A Retrospective Single Center Study
title_short Predictive Role of MRI and <sup>18</sup>F FDG PET Response to Concurrent Chemoradiation in T2b Cervical Cancer on Clinical Outcome: A Retrospective Single Center Study
title_full Predictive Role of MRI and <sup>18</sup>F FDG PET Response to Concurrent Chemoradiation in T2b Cervical Cancer on Clinical Outcome: A Retrospective Single Center Study
title_fullStr Predictive Role of MRI and <sup>18</sup>F FDG PET Response to Concurrent Chemoradiation in T2b Cervical Cancer on Clinical Outcome: A Retrospective Single Center Study
title_full_unstemmed Predictive Role of MRI and <sup>18</sup>F FDG PET Response to Concurrent Chemoradiation in T2b Cervical Cancer on Clinical Outcome: A Retrospective Single Center Study
title_sort predictive role of mri and <sup>18</sup>f fdg pet response to concurrent chemoradiation in t2b cervical cancer on clinical outcome: a retrospective single center study
publisher MDPI AG
series Cancers
issn 2072-6694
publishDate 2020-03-01
description Tumor response in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) is generally evaluated with MRI and PET, but this strategy is not supported by the literature. Therefore, we compared the diagnostic performance of these two techniques in the response evaluation to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in LACC. Patients with cervical cancer (CC) stage T2b treated with CCRT and submitted to MRI and PET/CT before and after treatment were enrolled in the study. All clinical, pathological, therapeutic, radiologic and follow-up data were collected and examined. The radiological response was analyzed and compared to the follow-up data. Data of 40 patients with LACC were analyzed. Agreement between MRI and PET/CT in the evaluation response to therapy was observed in 31/40 (77.5%) of cases. The agreement between MRI, PET/CT and follow-up data showed a Cohen kappa coefficient of 0.59 (95% CI = 0.267&#8722;0.913) and of 0.84 (95% CI = 0.636&#8722;1.00), respectively. Considering the evaluation of primary tumor response, PET/CT was correct in 97.5% of cases, and MRI in 92.5% of cases; no false negative cases were observed. These results suggest the use of PET/CT as a unique diagnostic imaging tool after CCRT, to correctly assess residual and progression disease.
topic locally advanced cervical cancer
pet/ct
mri
concurrent chemoradiotherapy
treatment response
follow up
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/3/659
work_keys_str_mv AT annamyriamperrone predictiveroleofmriandsup18supffdgpetresponsetoconcurrentchemoradiationint2bcervicalcanceronclinicaloutcomearetrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT giuliadondi predictiveroleofmriandsup18supffdgpetresponsetoconcurrentchemoradiationint2bcervicalcanceronclinicaloutcomearetrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT manuelacoe predictiveroleofmriandsup18supffdgpetresponsetoconcurrentchemoradiationint2bcervicalcanceronclinicaloutcomearetrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT martinaferioli predictiveroleofmriandsup18supffdgpetresponsetoconcurrentchemoradiationint2bcervicalcanceronclinicaloutcomearetrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT silvitelo predictiveroleofmriandsup18supffdgpetresponsetoconcurrentchemoradiationint2bcervicalcanceronclinicaloutcomearetrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT andreagaluppi predictiveroleofmriandsup18supffdgpetresponsetoconcurrentchemoradiationint2bcervicalcanceronclinicaloutcomearetrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT eugeniadecrescenzo predictiveroleofmriandsup18supffdgpetresponsetoconcurrentchemoradiationint2bcervicalcanceronclinicaloutcomearetrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT marcotesei predictiveroleofmriandsup18supffdgpetresponsetoconcurrentchemoradiationint2bcervicalcanceronclinicaloutcomearetrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT paolocastellucci predictiveroleofmriandsup18supffdgpetresponsetoconcurrentchemoradiationint2bcervicalcanceronclinicaloutcomearetrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT cristinananni predictiveroleofmriandsup18supffdgpetresponsetoconcurrentchemoradiationint2bcervicalcanceronclinicaloutcomearetrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT stefanofanti predictiveroleofmriandsup18supffdgpetresponsetoconcurrentchemoradiationint2bcervicalcanceronclinicaloutcomearetrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT alessiogmorganti predictiveroleofmriandsup18supffdgpetresponsetoconcurrentchemoradiationint2bcervicalcanceronclinicaloutcomearetrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT pierandreadeiaco predictiveroleofmriandsup18supffdgpetresponsetoconcurrentchemoradiationint2bcervicalcanceronclinicaloutcomearetrospectivesinglecenterstudy
_version_ 1724852423144505344